
Wong Kar-Wai's
2046
Sony Pictures Classics
In Limited Release
Starring:
Tony Leung Chiu Wai; Li Gong; Takuya Kimura;
Faye Wong;
Ziyi Zhang; Bai Ling; Carina Lau; Chen Chang;
Wang Sum; Ping Lam Siu;
Maggie Cheung; Thongchai McIntyre; Jie Dong.
Reviewed by Evan Sung
The danger for the fetishist is
that he/she becomes trapped in the cage of their
own endless, reiterative desires. Wong Kar-Wai,
in his deliciously kaleidoscopic film, 2046
teeters perilously on the brink of his own creative
implosion. But like his hero Chow Mo-Wan (a dashing,
brilliantined, Tony Leung Chiu-Wai), Wong succeeds
in escaping the pull of his own irretrievable
past. 2046 is a sort-of sequel to his
lavish, langorous In the Mood for Love.
Larger in cast, scope, and story, 2046
is also a haunted film: haunted by the success
of In the Mood for Love and the heavy
absence of Su Lizhen (Maggie Cheung Man Yuk who
reappears here only in cameo), Chow Mo-Wan’s
almost-lover from the first film.
Wong Kar-Wai is the rare contemporary director
who evokes the glory days of International Art
House cinema when the next Bergman or Godard film
was reason for celebration . 2046 has
been long-awaited by fans of WKW, as he’s
known in shorthand, and the notoriously ‘improvisational’
Wong reworked the film up to the very last. Originally
conceived as a science-fiction project completely
separate from In the Mood for Love, Wong
filmed both at the same time, and eventually the
two films seemed to merge for him. The version
of 2046 screened at last year’s
Cannes festival arrived only three hours before
its scheduled premier because of last minute edits.
Wong has reworked it since, and only now does
it exist in something close to definitive version.
As always, Wong’s fetish for nostalgia drives
the narrative with powerful, hyper-romantic force.
In 2046, Chow Mo-Wan returns from Singapore
a changed man, a rakish womanizer with a Clark
Gable, pencil-thin moustache, and twinkling, mischievous
eyes. Looking up an old flame at the Oriental
Hotel, he finds her missing, and tries to take
her room, Room 2046 (the same hotel room number
as the room he shared with Su Lizhen in In
the Mood for Love). The landlord tells him
its unavailable but gives Chow Room 2047 instead.
Still a writer, Chow now writes lurid newspaper
gossip and parties like a man trying hard to escape
his past. Along the way, he shares a fling with
the new neighbor in Room 2046, Bai Ling (Zhang
Ziyi). She’s a fellow libertine on a downward
spiral, and her eventual dissolution is a counterpoint
to the redemption that Chow will find. Gong Li
is a powerful presence as the mysterious black-gloved
gambler known only as the Black Spider. But when
he meets Jingwen, the hotel landlord’s lovelorn
daughter (Hong Kong pop superstar, Faye Wong),
he is inspired to work on a futuristic novel entitled
2047. The novel becomes Chow’s means of
escape, a means of putting the legacy of Hotel
Room 2046 behind him, the haunted past of a lost
love that he cannot forget.
As in In the Mood for Love, wardrobe
and set design are practically characters in their
own right. Wong’s fetish for pattern and
texture rule the day in his idealized version
of Hong Kong circa 1967. And as before, Wong films
his actors with care and attention, every styled,
costume-designed square inch of them. They may
be dying of heartbreak, but at least they’re
dying in style. Lost love is everywhere in 2046,
and longing and regret and heartache permeate
every frame of the film. Labrythine and elusive,
2046 is cinematic opium, hazy and erotic
and a profound pleasure for the senses.
Hans Petter Moland's
The Beautiful Country
Opens July 8, 2005
Starring: Nick Nolte, Bai Ling, Tim Roth and
newcomer Damien Nguyen.
Reviewed by
Tova Bernbaum
Like any historical subject that’s
inspired its fair share of western guilt, Vietnam
has been covered exhaustively by filmmakers
over the years. However, it’s telling
that few western movies have examined the legacy
of the Vietnam War from the vantage point of
the Vietnamese themselves. The Beautiful
Country, a moving if occasionally harsh
film, offers a refreshing perspective: it focuses
on the plight of one Amerasian man as he journeys
to the U.S. to find the American father (Nick
Nolte) who disappeared during the war.
When we are first introduced to Binh (Damien
Nguyen), he is living with a foster family who
treats him like a servant and considers his
mix of Asian and Western features distinctly
ugly. He is one of the “Bui Doi,”
a disparaging term meaning “dust of life,”
used to describe the children of Vietnamese
mothers and American soldiers. Soft-spoken and
hard-working, he has the bearing of one who
has been insulted by those he serves all his
life; but Binh is not as resigned as he seems.
When he finds out that his real mother is still
alive, he leaves his village behind and travels
to Saigon to meet her.
After a series of inquiries, Binh is reunited
with his mother, Mai (Thi Kim Xuan), as well
as a half-brother he didn’t know existed.
But the trio’s happiness is short-lived.
When an accident occurs at the home of the wealthy
family where Mai works, Binh is forced to flee
to America with his brother - a trip that is
far from a simple journey. The two must endure
treacherous boat rides, a stay in a Malaysian
refugee camp, and the prospect of indentured
servitude once they arrive in New York. Binh’s
only clue to his father’s whereabouts
is the Texas address written on his parents’
marriage license.
The issues at hand - cultural displacement,
human trafficking, third-world suffering –
could have easily overwhelmed the story, but
Norwegian director Hans Petter Moland’s
humanist touch keeps the focus squarely on the
characters. The tragedy can feel contrived at
times, but give Moland credit; for every life-is-shit
moment, there’s an equally poignant scene
of joy in the midst of suffering, as when a
water pump in the refugee camp bursts and the
inhabitants frolic in the ensuing mudslide.
The director also gets an assist from newcomer
Nguyen, who conveys with few words the common
decency of a man who manages to remain kind
in the face of a cruel world. His scenes with
Bai Ling, as a Chinese refugee hoping to whore
her way to freedom, are touching and help to
elevate the sometimes flat dialogue.
The Beautiful Country is small in scale,
but the film’s simple, empathetic style
works to its advantage. Instead of turning characters
into symbols or bludgeoning viewers with ideology,
the movie tells a straightforward story that
allows for life’s complexities. By portraying
the struggle of a man who has suffered because
of his American roots but still hopes for a
better life across the ocean, The Beautiful
Country (a reference, by the way, to Binh’s
nickname for the states) manages to capture
America’s uncanny ability to act as perpetrator
and savior at the same time.
The Dirtiest Joke Ever Told:
Penn Jilette and Paul Provenza’s
The Aristocrats
Opens July 29, 2005
In this joke there’s the set up:
“Guy walks into an agent’s office…”
And the punch line:
“I call it 'The Aristocrats!'”
Reviewed by Ilise S. Carter
But it’s
what comes in-between that’s really the
stuff of showbiz legend. More than just a dirty
joke, The Aristocrats is a foul-mouthed
heirloom that’s been handed down from generation-to-generation
of comics, since the days of vaudeville. It’s
also the subject of Paul Provenza and Penn Jillette’s
new documentary.
This secret fraternity
handshake of the comedy world is, in point of
fact, not a particularly funny or original joke.
Nor is it a crowd favorite (actually, it’s
never really supposed to be told on stage). Instead,
the fun lies in ability of the teller to weave
the longest, filthiest, most elaborate yarn his
peers have ever heard. There are, however, no
hard and fast rules on just how to do that either
– the direction of the story is determined
only by the twisted imagination of the raconteur.
Some of the possibilities examined in the documentary
include incest, bestiality, “Hitler in crotch-less
panties,” and a host of other scenarios
that the editorial policy of this publication
prohibits even alluding to.
While the shock
value is great and plentiful, that isn’t
what makes this homespun little film so fun to
watch. It’s the “behind the scenes”
quality that makes it worth sitting through infinite
versions of the very same joke. Shot with handheld
cameras and edited on a Mac, Jillette and Provenza
have given The Aristocrats a home movie
feeling. This atmosphere gives viewers the sense
that they are literally being let in on an inside
joke by bringing the audience into a world that
was previously only accessible to those privileged
enough to sit in on the after-hours sessions that
take place in the backrooms of comedy clubs and
casinos.
The film includes
interviews with over a hundred professional comics,
writers, magicians, and entertainers, comprising
several generations and a wide range of styles.
Some of the most outrageous versions actually
come from comedians who’ve made their fortune
providing wholesome family entertainment (e.g.,
Bob Sagat even manages a mention of his former
co-stars, the Olsen Twins, in his tale), while
other veterans are surprisingly modest (such as
Phyllis Diller, who insists she actually fainted
from shock the first time she heard the joke.)
In addition, there are reminiscences about legendary
tellings (“…an hour and a half and
then he messed up the punch line!”) and
the most inappropriate times it was told (at a
post-9/11 Friars’ Club Roast of Hugh Hefner)
and other such delightful oddities surrounding
the long and sordid history of The Aristocrats.
Which, in the end, is really the funniest part
of the whole joke.

John Singleton's
Four Brothers
Opens August 12th
Tagline: They came
home to bury mom... and her killer.
Starring:
Mark Wahlberg; Tyrese; Angel Mercer; André
3000; Garrett Hedlund; Terrence Dashon Howard;
Josh Charles; Sofía Vergara; Fionnula Flanagan;
Chiwetel Ejiofor; Taraji P. Henson; Barry Shabaka
Henley; Jernard Burks; Kenneth Welsh; Tony Nappo;
Shawn Singleton.
Reviewed by Caroline Smith
Tough. Just what you’d
expect from a Wahlberg. Despite broken bodies,
broken hearts, and broken trust, this film’s
plot surprisingly held up. Instead, the gunshots
mocked my low expectations and I couldn’t
help but drown myself in the brotherly love.
Director John Singleton
(Boyz N the Hood, 2 Fast 2 Furious)
did little in developing the chemistry between
his four men: Mark Wahlberg, Tyrese Gibson, Andre
Benjamin, and Garrett Hedlund. He threw them on
the ice rink and just said, “Play hockey.”
The bond formed naturally. Beneath their tough
exteriors, their loyalty was unbreakable.
The adopted sons
reunite because their ‘angel of a mother’,
Evelyn Mercer, (Fionnula Flanagan) is murdered
in a convenience store. They rush home to Detroit
and… well, you’d think you knew the
rest. O.K. you’re almost right, with the
exception of a few potholes. As it’s no
surprise, the boys get involved with their mother’s
killer but quickly realize that the world of crime
has changed drastically since their days of delinquency.
Bobby, (Wahlberg)
the ringleader, has the role down sharp, like
his greasy, slicked locks. His constant badgering
of Jack, (Hedlund) the youngest Mercer, will put
a smile on your face. In fact, the laughs are
as plentiful as the gunshots in this movie. Even
the smaller roles like Sofi, Angel’s (Gibson)
insane “la vida loca” girlfriend,
and the mink-coated mafia man, Victor Sweet, give
this film a little extra than let’s just
say the normal serving of blood, guts, and violence.
However, in the
midst of the notorious Singleton car chasings
and shootings, I had to ask myself if I really
believed that “the town’s sweetest
lady, Evelyn Mercer,” would have been proud
of her sons. After all, she adopted these delinquents
with the ‘Mother Theresa’ hope of
turning them around. But boys will be boys. They
avenge Mom’s death, whether she likes it
or not.
Singleton creates
early maudlin scenes so that the violence is justifiable
in the end. In other words, the boys grieve first
so they can kill later. Yes, this film skates
on some pretty predictable ice but there are just
enough nicks there to keep it from seeming too
contrived. And no, Outkast’s Andre “3000”
Benjamin does not break out in a rumble scene
singing, “Shake it like a Polaroid picture.”
Though I do think he’s better off doing
that than the film thing.
Fight to
see this one. It’s a lot of fun.
www.FourBrothersMovie.com
Fernando Meirelles'
The Constant Gardener
Opening August 31, 2005
Starring: Ralph Fiennes, Rachel Weisz, Danny Huston,
Archie Panjabi,
Bill Nighy
Reviewed by Frank
J. Avella
The trailer for
The Constant Gardener filled me with
fear. John le Carre’ is an amazing writer,
but when was the last time one of his novel’s
was adapted into a great film? (I am personally
partial to The Little Drummer Girl) This
particular trailer was filled with the visual
cross-cutting cacophony we’ve learned to
expect from the annoying summer action-flick.
Had Ralph Fiennes sold out? Did Fernando Meirelles
‘go Hollywood’? Didn’t The Mummy
Part 13 teach Rachel Weisz anything?
I breathed a tremendous
sign of relief as the first few frames of The
Constant Gardener flickered and by the time
the credits rolled, I was blown away by how against-the-typical-Hollywood-grain-great
this film actually was.
The gifted Fernando
Meirelles (City of God), along with crackerjack
screenwriter Jeffrey Caine and their fantastic
cast and crew have completely reinvented the summer
action-thriller mostly by giving it a healthy
dose of two things it hasn’t contained since
the seventies: realism and intelligence. Imagine
a smart film that provides action and suspense.
Now imagine that film is actually about something...
something important. And imagine the scares coming
from the realities of the unjust world we live
in. That’s right-- no comic book villains,
no overblown effects, no gimmicky twist ending
and no one in tights!
Set (and exquisitely
shot) in Northern Kenya, The Constant Gardener
unfolds after the brutal murder of Tessa Quayle
(Weisz), wife of British diplomat Justin Quayle
(Fiennes). The death is made to look like a crime
of passion and the usually indifferent Justin
begins stumbling upon evidence to the contrary.
So begins his startling and terrifying journey
as he discovers taboo truths about the pharmaceutical
industry in Africa and the British High Commission’s
involvement. Along the the road to his dangerous
enlightenment, he also finds out more about his
wife than he ever knew when she was alive.
At the heart of
The Constant Gardener is the most refreshingly
unconventional love story since Lost in Translation.
Through flashbacks, we gain keen insight into
the lives of Justin and Tessa. Their meeting and
subsequent marriage is one of physical attraction-meets-convenience.
It isn’t until after Tessa’s murder
that Justin falls deeply in love with her.
Ralph Fiennes,
in a remarkably brave, daring and painfully romantic
performance, proves he’s the leading man
for the new millennium. This is a richly nuanced
turn that may deservedly bring him his third Academy
Award nomination.
Rachel Weisz emblazes
the screen with Tessa, brilliantly conveying the
woman’s passions --political and otherwise,
yet enabling the audience to glimpse her gentler
side as well.
There are stellar
supporting performances by Danny Huston &
Pete Postlethwaite as well as a brief but dynamic
turn by the ubiquitous Bill Nighy who has film’s
funniest line.
One of the unsung
stars of The Constant Gardner is Kenya.
Thanks to Meirelles and his production team the
audience spends a few hours in an astonishingly
beautiful country that the west seems to have
abandoned to famine and disease.
Never a polemic,
the film does voice a very urgent message about
the power the pharmaceutical industry has over
most of the world. It’s a terrifying reality
we should all be aware of. Kudos to Mereilles
for bringing home the message with such diligence
and artistry and simultaneously crafting a riveting,
genre-blasting piece of cinema.
The perfect summer
movie is finally here!
Lutz Hachmeister & Michael
Kloft
THE Goebbels Experiment
Opens August 12, 2005
Quad Cinema
Reviewed by Frank
J. Avella
No one person living
in the 20th Century mastered and manipulated propaganda
for the most evil of purposes with the greatest
of success than Joseph Goebbels.
One of Hitler’s
inner circle flunkies, Goebbels devoted his life
to showing the world the power of the Nazi party.
Yet, out of the spotlight, Goebbels led a complex,
manic-depressive inner life.
This paradoxic
figure is explored in The Goebbels Experiment,
a gripping new documentary by Lutz Hachmeister
& Michael Kloft. The film probes personal
passages from a diary Goebbels kept from 1924
until right before his death in the bunker in
1945 and features rare newsreel footage and film
clips from the period. All this material makes
for a frightening, fascinating portrait.
Movies that probe
the mind of a psycho are always interesting, like
that train wreck you MUST stop and study. But
here we also get a depiction of a people on the
cusp of facilitating one of the worst atrocities
mankind has ever known. And Goebbels himself seems
aware of his own growing place in history.
Poor, young, suicidal
Goebbels apparently felt “lost in the universe”
and quite paranoid about everything and everyone
around him. This anxiety would follow him throughout
his life, although the public Goebbels appeared
confident and assured. As he excelled in his position
Goebbels arrogantly discussed his detractors by
proudly proclaiming: “we frighten them.”
The war years propelled Goebbels’ propaganda
machine to it’s most horrifying zenith,
but his grisly fate (and that of his family) proved
inevitable.
One of the more
unusual aspects of Goebbels personality explored
is his fascination with films. He felt that what
Germany lacked and desperately needed was talented
Aryan actors the world would embrace.
In one of the many
examples of his duplicitous personality, the film
shows images of him happily shmoozing Leni Riefenstahl
while the voice-over diary entry exclaims, “There
is no way I can work with a lunatic like her.”
Expertly narrated
by Kenneth Branagh, The Goebbels Experiment
is an intriguing and chilling historical study
as well as a timely warning about the terrifying
place a controlled media can lead a needy and
desperate people.
Quad Cinema 34 West 13th
Street
Lexi Alexanders's
Hooligans
Opens September 9, 2005
Reviewed by Evan
Sung at the 2005 Tribeca Film Festival
From Hobbits to Hooligans,
Elijah Wood finds himself a new fellowship in
the sometimes brutal, consistently fascinating
first time feature by director Lexi Alexander.
Hooligans premiered in the US at Austin’s
SXSW festival, where it garnered the award for
Best Narrative Feature, and now makes an encore
appearance at the 2005 Tribeca Film Festival.
Set in the tightly-knit milieu of impassioned
and just as tightly-wound loyal followers of local
soccer…ahem…football teams in England
known as Hooligans, the film gives viewers
a largely honest insight into the conflicted psychology
and the destructive effects of such tightly bound,
clannish alliances.
Elijah Wood plays
Matt Buckley, a gifted, bookish Harvard journalism
student wrongly expelled two months before graduation.
When the cocaine belonging to his roommate, the
wealthy and smug son of a Senator, is found in
Matt’s affairs, Matt buckles under the pressure
and political influence of his roommate and takes
the fall. Matt leaves Harvard for London, to seek
refuge with his sister Shannon (Claire Forlani)
and her husband Steve and reevaluate his future.
Almost immediately, Matt falls in with Steve’s
younger brother Pete, the fast-talking alpha dog
of the Green Street Elite, one of West Ham United
Football’s toughest firms. Just before Pete
introduces Matt to the rest of his pals, he warns
Matt that “firms” – the name
for these organized hooligan gangs – hate
two things above all, Americans and journalists.
Matt passes himself off as a history student,
but in spite of his Yank roots, finds an easy
acceptance among the other GSE. Only Bovver, Pete’s
right hand in the GSE (played with inscrutable
scuzziness by Leo Gregory), finds Matt’s
presence in the group an intolerable offense.
As Matt becomes closer to Pete and his band of
merry, violent hooligans, he learns about fraternity,
sticking up for one’s self and one’s
friends, and its spiraling, escalating consequences.
Alexander opens
the film subtly, striking just the right chord
of dread, of impending cataclysm. In an empty
tube station, a lone passenger waits for the next
train when a gently crescendoing chorus of voices
floats up from the vacant stairwell. The rising
voices are enough to suggest a carousing band
of drunken boors, and it’s not a far leap
to imagine ourselves as that lone passenger trapped
on that tube platform along with them. Our thoughts
spin out the worst of possibilities. Where Hooligans
is most successful is in playing with our preconceptions
of the world of hooligans, at times challenging
them, at other times showing us that we haven’t
even begun to imagine the reality.
Elijah Wood seems, at first, an incongruous choice
for a hardened hooligan, with his delicate, sometimes
feminine demeanor. And when Pete decides suddenly
that instead of beating the living shit out of
Matt he’ll take him under his wing, its
hard not to guffaw at the implausibility. But
to Wood’s credit, the disbelief lasts only
a moment, and when Matt takes his first real punch
to the face, his beatific smile of release and
liberation is funny and credible.
Yes, there are
moments that don’t ring quite true. Why,
for example, does Pete have perfect teeth? (English
AND a hooligan? By all rights, he shouldn’t
have any at all.) And the story of Matt and Shannon’s
emotionally absent father seems clichéd.
But the quasi-documentary realism with which hooliganism
is treated makes up for these minor infractions.
And Charlie Hunnam’s fireball performance
as Pete is both engaging and tragic, and truly
takes us into the emotional world of these men.
Alexander also skillfully manages to involve the
viewer while never sanctioning or sensationalizing
the violence depicted. The film, ultimately, is
thought-provoking, magnetic and repelling, in
its sympathetic authenticity.
Hooligans will be released in the UK
and Europe in August. At press time, the film
was still searching for its US distributor, but
judging from the critical and audience response
both at Tribeca and SXSW, it won’t be long
before the hooligans are invading your local cinema.

Craig Brewer’s
Hustle & Flow
Opens July 22nd., 2005
Reviewed by Wendy R. Williams
Trolling for johns
on the backstreets of Memphis, DJay (Terrence
Howard) is the king of his small world. With a
silver tongue to match the spinning chrome wheels
of his "hooptie" (his beat-up old ride),
DJay cajoles his girls--his whore Nola (played
by Taryn Manning); his whore-on-maternity-leave
Shug (played by Taraji P. Henson); his "dancer"
Lexus (played by Paula Jai Parker) - and he corrals
their tricks (who are nameless, but then, aren't
they always?). But this pimp wants more and somewhere
deep inside him, he knows there is more and that
there is something inside him that needs to come
out.
And then one day
there is a little serendipity. A crazed old man
sells DJay a child’s keyboard in exchange
for a bit of marijuana (DJay’s side business)
and he runs into an old school friend, Key (played
by Anthony Anderson). Key has a middle- class
life, complete with his middle-class wife, Yvette
(played by Elise Neal). Key also has a middle-class
business, producing music for churches. But Key
has a dream, too; he always wanted to be more.
But as he tells DJay, there are two kinds of guys
- the ones who talk the talk and the ones who
walk the walk. And according to Key, DJay is a
talker and he, Key, is a walker.
I used to live
in Memphis and I can’t talk about this story
without talking about how hot it is in the summer
(this movie is set in June). Memphis also has
an incredibly poor and uneducated black underclass.
I moved to Memphis from Dallas in 1979 and it
was like moving back thirty years in time in terms
of race relations (Dallas was no paragon of racial
harmony back then, either), and my friends tell
me things have not changed much since then. Memphis
is the true Old South with its symbolic big foot
stomping down on guys like DJay. Plus, like I
said, it is incredibly hot. And this mix of heat
and poverty that gave birth to the blues has now
“birthed” another form of music -
Crank, Memphis-born Southern hip hop.
And Crank is what DJay wants. He knows he has
something inside him that just has to get out,
but he has no clue as to how he can make it happen.
He supposedly knew Skinny Black (played by Ludacris),
a wildly successful Memphis-born rapper, who has
gone on to a Hollywood style of fame. Skinny is
coming back to Memphis on the Fourth of July to
have a party at a bar owned by Arnell (Isaac Hayes).
DJay has an “in” with Arnel and he
collars the job of supplying Skinny’s weed.
DJay then uses his “connection” with
Skinny and his silver tongue to hustle Key into
helping him produce a track to harness DJay’s
hustle into flow (his rap).
So, the race is
on. Key comes to DJay’s house (a beat up
old “shotgun” in the worse part of
town) and with the help of borrowed and improvised
equipment (stapled egg cartons on the walls for
insulation), they get started. They are soon joined
by the incredibly charismatic Shelby (played by
DJ Qualls), who makes his living playing for churches,
but who also knows a few things about putting
down a track.
Hustle and
Flow is a great story, told by great characters,
and it has the one vital element that all great
stories share - redemption. And it is so very
real. I left the theater feeling like I knew those
guys and their girls (this story is definitely
not politically correct), and why they were the
way they were. And I got a glimpse of the thing
that was inside all of them that just had to come
out. The plot itself has Shakespearean overtones
– there is so much at stake and such a small
window of escape from this Memphis world of sizzling
heat and crushing poverty. And there wasn’t
a bad actor in this film. They all shone.
Craig Brewer, the
writer and director, is a master storyteller and
producer John Singleton is to be commended for
having the genius to recognize Brewer's talent
and for putting up his own money (according to
the press release) to produce this movie. And
kudos to co-producer Stephanie Allain, who had
the vision to shepherd this story through the
many years it took to get it made.
Hustle and Flow was the closing night
film at the 2005 Urbanworld Film Festival.

A National Geographic Feature
Film
Luc Jacquet's
March of the Penguins
Opens June 24, 2005
Lincoln Plaza Cinemas
and
The Angelika Film Center
Reviewed by Troy Tolley
Narrated by: Morgan
Freeman; Starring: The Emperor Penguin species;
Music by: Alex Wurman.
With the advent of modern technology,
it is not unusual for most of us humans to be
able to see and vicariously explore the reality
of other species on the planet that we would never
have even known existed otherwise. Flipping through
the hundreds of channels on cable, one can easily
stumble across a rare and even extinct species
that is fascinating to observe and study right
from the comfort of our living rooms. Although
that easy-access, armchair explorer is now a flippant
pasttime that many of us take for granted, it
does not prepare you for the fascination, beauty,
emotion, and intensity of March of the Penguins.
I have seen films
that put human drama into a context that makes
me terribly grateful for the life I have, even
making me feel embarrassed for ever complaining,
but I have never seen a film about another species
that made me leave the theater thinking, “How
in the hell can I ever complain about
anything in my life ever again, after that!?”
March of the
Penguins takes you on a journey through the
life cycles of the isolated, enduring, and rare
species of the emperor penguin, living in the
most remote and harshest of environments on Earth:
Antarctica. This is not just a bland documentary
that might be more suited for a schoolroom, but
a very real submersion into a way of life that
none of us could ever have comprehended without
this film.
The penguins, with
their eerily and endearing humanesque qualities,
stand and walk alone, in a line, from their familiar
coastal homes, inland and into the harshest of
winters on earth, just to make love and to offer
continued life to their species. Watching this
journey made me feel the lack (and hope) in our
human species as varying groups of penguins converge
in the mating territory where a most miraculous
and disturbing cycle must play out.
Taking up to two
weeks, the penguins sing individual songs for
each other until as many are paired up as possible,
drawn together only through a special resonance
one feels for the song of another. For about two
months after the mating process, the pairs have
no food, and endure subzero, blazing winds; then
an egg is laid onto the feet of each mother penguin.
Each penguin couple only gets this one egg, this
one chance to nurture a life beyond their own.
With deadly temperatures surrounding them, the
starving mother must somehow pass the egg from
her own feet to the feet of the father penguin
without the egg touching the ground for more than
five seconds - or it will freeze immediately,
taking the life inside. Many do not succeed in
this process.
If the process
is successful, the weakened mother then leaves
the clan to journey back to the coast, which is
now even further away because of the freezing
and changing coastline of winter, in the hope
that she can return two months later with food
for her emerging baby. She must endure the weather
and avoid the terrifying predators that she knows
will be awaiting her. If she does not return,
then the incubation and birth of her baby will
be for naught, as her baby can survive only one
day without the food the mother must bring back.
Meanwhile, the
father penguins huddle tightly into a mass of
warmth, walking and rotating the outer bodies
of their mass to keep the group from having to
feel the full force of winter, all the while keeping
the fragile eggs resting on their precarious feet
against winds up to one hundred and fifty miles
per hour. By the time the baby is hatched, he
will have existed four months without food, and
will have only one day to live, unless his mother
returns with nourishment.
And the stakes
only continue to grow higher, with far too many
obstacles ahead for me to explain them all in
this review. In the end, it is not the obstacles
that are impressive, but the utterly awe-inspiring
unity that must exist among the penguins for this
process to work. It moved me to tears, riveted
me to the point of exclamation (and I never exclaim
during a movie), and had me laughing out loud
at what seemed to be such charming humor among
the penguins, despite their obligatory and powerful
voyage through life.
OFFICIAL SITE:
http://wip.warnerbros.com/marchofthepenguins/
Run Time: 80 Minutes - Rated: G
Brian Herzlinger, Brett
Winn, Jon Gunn's
My Date with Drew
Opening in select theaters August 5, 2005
Reviewed by Christina
M. Hinke
Working the six-degrees-of-separation
theory helps an ordinary guy get a date with Drew
Barrymore in Brian Herzlinger’s comedic
documentary My Date with Drew. After
winning $1,100 on a game show pilot, twenty-seven-year-old
Brian buys a digital video camera at Circuit City
(where he can return it in thirty days) and makes
a film of his quest to date Drew. With the help
of two film school buddies, Brett Winn and Jon
Gunn, he canoodles his way into the hearts of
people surrounding Drew. Now we’re not talking
Cameron Diaz, but we are talking about people
like Eric Roberts and Corey Feldman.
The film is heartfelt in its depiction of Brian’s
quest to fulfill his dream to meet his life-long
crush, Drew, and of his quest to fulfill his other
dream – to make a film. With no job and
the bills piling high, he risks bad credit for
his aspiration. He shows the audience what an
unconfident, dirty T-shirt wearing, unshaven,
desperately-needing-a-haircut type of guy he is,
and one wonders how he is ever going to have a
chance with Drew Barrymore. But it’s his
self-deprecating, easy-going, fun-loving spirit
that actually might attract her. This is a guy
who sings along to cheesy songs on the car radio
and to the Muzak on voice mail. Of course she’d
get him; she can be just as corny. But we’ll
see.
The film quality
is grainy, with muted colors, and at times the
camera cuts off tops of heads and pans rooms,
resulting in a nauseating effect. But with a budget
of $1,100, $75 of which was wasted paying a psychic
for love advice, one can’t expect Spielberg.
But hey, it beat out Garden State and
Super Size Me by winning the Audience Award
for Best Feature Film at the 2004 HBO Comedy Arts
Festival.
In the end Brian
is not the ordinary guy he proclaims to be. He
has a film, a web site and a ton of publicity,
so his chances of meeting Drew are higher than
if he didn’t have these things. The film
is certainly a joyride about a search for a dream;
and to quote Drew Barrymore herself, “If
you don’t take risks, you’ll have
a wasted soul.”
My Date With
Drew was produced by Kerry David and is rated
PG.
Mick Davis’
Modigliani
Opens July 1st in New York
Reviewed by Christina
M. Hinke
Artists of the early 20th Century,
Picasso, Cocteau, Utrillo, Soutine, Rivera and
of course the mad Modigliani (Andy Garcia) are
all together in the biopic, simply titled Modigliani.
But the true genius of the film is Elsa Zylberstein
playing Modigliani’s muse, Jeanne Hebuterne;
she electrifies the screen and sweeps the movie
from underneath Andy Garcia’s feet.
An emerging French actress, Elsa
Zylberstein (Metroland, Mina Tannenbaum),
plays Jeanne with emotional eloquence. On the
eve of Modigliani's death, she appears, as if
a ghost, her life drained out of her due to her
lover’s mortality, to convey one last breath
of eternity to Pablo Picasso: "As you lay
there on your deathbed… you will see the
face of Modigliani… he will be all that
you wish you were." She evokes such power
and beauty you almost believe she is the real
Jeanne.
The film tells of Amedeo Modigliani’s last
year of life. Known as Modi to his friends (rhymes
with the French word maudit, or "accursed"
in English), he spends his time drinking, taking
drugs, painting his canvasses and mocking Pablo
Picasso. All of Paris waits with baited breath
for the two to compete in the yearly art competition,
Salon Des Artistes. As self-titled geniuses,
neither will enter the contest. One artist even
eats the flyer, saying “Hmm.. steak rare.”
Yet, it brings 5,000 Francs to the winner.
Modi is in great despair: Having no money, living
like the true bohemian he was, he is greatly ashamed
of his squalid state, especially since all of
his friends live well. Wanting to care for his
and Jeanne’s baby, he signs up for the competition,
#6 on the list, with Pablo dramatically signing
as #7 – the last. Off the great painters
go to their studios in a mad frenzy of frustration,
exhilaration and exhaustion. They are dripping
with sweat and covered in their acrylics or oils,
painting their muses and souls out on canvas.
The climax is the unveiling of the
masters’ works. The score is perfectly attuned
to the dramatics of the scene, the tempo quickening
and the volume rising with the intensity of the
night. A flood of diverse emotions overwhelms
the ears with sadness, happiness, defeat and conquest,
so much so it makes you want to jump out of your
seat and into the screen to join the party.
Partly produced by Garcia’s production company
Cineson, Garcia cast himself as the lead –
Modigliani, an Italian Sephardic Jew. Garcia does
a passable job at playing the crazy Italian painter,
portraying the passionate, maniacal artist with
spirit, but at other times he is just over-the-top
and appears silly. Pablo Picasso is shown as an
arrogant genius and solidly acted by Omid Djalili
(The Mummy; Gladiator). He trots
around with boastfulness and exuberance, making
you like him and hate him at the same time. Model
Eva Herzigova (who has a not-meant-to-be-comedic
accent, likened to Frau Farbissina of Austin
Powers) is miscast as his first wife and
muse, Olga. Although she mostly just
stands around and looks pretty, a more experienced
actor should have been chosen for such an icon
of muses. The cameo appearances of Gertrude Stein
(played by Miriam Margolyes) and Renoir lend some
humor to the movie.
At 128 minutes the film could have
been edited down. Some scenes confuse the audience,
or just don’t add much to the plot (the
dream-like sequences are just incoherent). If
Mick Davis, writer and director, could only have
seen that Jeanne’s story was the money-maker,
the account could be powerfully told through Jeanne’s
voice. We see both Jeanne’s view of Modigliani
and Modi’s view of himself, and the seesaw
effect makes it hard to grab on to.
The script has Modigliani’s first solo exhibition
happening in 1919, yet it really occurred in 1917.
It added heat to Pablo’s and Modi’s
animosity, for him to finally have his own show
while Picasso enjoys his tenth - but one doubts
the veracity of the script.
Watching Jeanne brought to life by Elsa Zylberstein
in a moving performance is why you should see
this film. If only it were her film.
Rated R 128 minutes
Dana Adam Shapiro and Henry
Alex Rubin's
Murderball
Opened New York City and Los Angeles on July 8,
2005
Reviewed by Matthew Rosen
The trials and
tribulations of quadriplegic rugby players are
well documented in the flick Murderball.
That’s right, quadriplegic rugby. This rugby
is played on a basketball court with four eight-minute
quarters, and the object is to carry the ball
from one end to the other. In the way, however,
are wheelchair-bound players aiming to hit you
as hard as possible. And while the Mad-Max-looking
wheelchairs are cool as hell, it’s the crazy
individuals riding in them that “make”
this documentary.
Starting at the
2002 World Championships in Sweden, the documentary
follows the path of the fierce US and Canadian
Quad Rugby Team, depicting their rivalry as they
prepare to dominate their world at the 2004 Paralympics
in Athens, Greece.
The competition
is intense and "helmers" Henry Alex
Rubin and Dana Adam Shapiro remind the viewers
again and again that these men are out for blood.
“We’re not here to get a pat on the
back,” states one player, when reminded
that some people mistake the Paralympics for the
Special Olympics. “We’re here to win
the gold.”
The film's main
protagonists, US Team Leader Mark Zupan and Canadian
Coach Joe Soares, carry the film with their immense
rivalry and personal tribulations. Their tales
intertwine harmoniously and this viewer was left
wanting more.
Zupan, the poster
child for the US Team, fought mental rage and
physical devastation to seek redemption in the
sport. Having lost his ability to walk due to
a horrible car accident, he is now determined
to lead Team USA to victory. Meanwhile, he is
still attempting to reconcile with his best friend,
Chris Igoe, the driver of the car that caused
the accident
Joe Soares, ex-Team
USA All Star, is the Benedict Arnold of his time.
Soares signed on with Team Canada as their head
coach, and on the court all he wants is to defeat
Team USA. But we also see a different side of
Soares's character when the documentary follows
him home and we see his struggle to connect with
his sensitive son.
Murderball
shows that there is life after a paralyzing accident.
Zupan visits a rehabilitation center and helps
a depressed, paralyzed motocross biker find hope
in the game. Soares undergoes a total transformation
following a heart attack, and reconnects with
his family.
Snazzy camera work
and phenomenal editing add to the overall effectiveness
of the documentary. And while Soares and Zupan
move this film to its phenomenal human heights,
the filmmakers never lose sight of the game itself.
Murderball is both a heartfelt story
of winners and losers who will never stand up
again, and a fantastic sports documentary that
will make you fly off the seat of your chair.
Murderball
was the winner of the Audience Award for Best
Documentary Feature at the Sundance Film Festival.
www.murderballmovie.com.
Too Much, Too Soon:
Greg Whiteley's New York Doll
Written by Ilise S. Carter
Looking back, it’s impossible
to underestimate the influence of the New York
Dolls. As punk pioneers they set the standard
for a revolutionary brand of rock and roll sound,
style and excess that would be followed by almost
every act from The Clash to Motley Crue. At
the time, however, it was a different story
altogether. This story of a band’s meteoric
rise and fall and rise again is the subject
of Greg Whiteley’s new documentary New
York Doll.
Focusing on bassist, Arthur
“Killer” Kane, the film details
the musician’s almost incredible story
of self-destruction and redemption. Initially,
Kane would trod the now nearly cliché
path of rock stars before and since: initial
underground success; followed by record deals
and an attempt at a mainstream audience; trailed
quickly by the band’s implosion due to
unchecked egos and substance abuse. What came
in the intervening years was a handful of seminal
proto-punk albums, the groundbreaking addition
of androgyny to rock style and a small, but
devoted following of fans; some of whom who
would eventually find themselves at the forefront
of musical innovation. But ultimately, it would
be the aftermath of rock and roll stardom that
proved the greatest test of Kane’s life.
In the wreckage of his post-Dolls
career, Kane sank into profound alcohol abuse
that eventually led him to attempt suicide by
jumping out a window. He was badly injured,
but alive and it was at this point that he found
the Mormons, or, as they prefer to be called,
the Church of Latter Day Saints (LDS). A zealous
convert, Kane credited LDS with saving his life
and keeping him sober. He even found work as
a clerk with their genealogy library in Los
Angeles. And it seems he would have remained
there in anonymous poverty, recalling his glory
days and hoping for a comeback were it not for
the intervention of former Smiths’ front
man, Morrissey.
As guest curator of the Meltdown
Festival in London in the spring of 2004, Morrissey
managed to pull off what many music fans would’ve
have believed to be the impossible – a
reunion of the surviving Dolls’ members.
The footage that covers Kane’s travels
from LA; including getting his bass out of hock
for the occasion, with money borrowed from his
bishop, no less; to the awkward rehearsals and
reunion with David Johansen; and the trip to
London for the show is some of the most moving
and interesting of the whole film. Watching
Kane marvel at his modest hotel room or putting
together an outfit for the show that combines
LDS founder Brigham Young and leather pants
really gives the viewer the sense of Kane’s
almost childlike innocence and sweetness. This
is not an egomaniac rock star jockeying for
a comeback, but just a simple guy with a sincere
wish to get back to doing what he loves best
-- playing music with his friends. Given this,
it’s hard to believe that Kane’s
tragic death from leukemia just weeks later
is fact and not the product of some overwrought
melodrama.
In addition to the poignant
personal story at its center, NY Doll is
one of those rare documentaries that opens up
a subject to audiences that may not already
be converts. Whiteley effectively uses animations
to give you a sense of the New York Dolls place
in music history and their impact. This device
works beautifully with the more classic talking
head interviews with peers and fans, such as
Mick Jones of The Clash and Iggy Pop of The
Stooges, whose music was influenced by the Dolls.
And while this will surely inspire a sense of
nostalgia in fans of punk and its offspring,
it may also go a long way toward getting the
New York Dolls the recognition they so richly
deserve.
Bob Clark’s
Now & Forever
Starring: Mia Kirshner;
Adam Beach; Gordon Tootoosis; Theresa Russell;
Gabriel Olds.
Reviewed by Christina
M. Hinke
Bob Clark’s new wistful
romantic drama of a love story, Now &
Forever is a one hundred and eighty degree
turn from his 1980’s flesh fest Porky’s.
Set amidst picturesque panoramic Saskatchewan
landscapes in the fictional town of Spencer,
the film tells a tale of John Myron’s
(Adam Beach) secret love for his childhood friend
Angela Wilson (Mia Kirshner). Angela is consumed
by her desire to escape from the small town
and detach herself from rumors of her mother’s
loose lifestyle even though by doing so she
will leave behind her close friendship with
John.
Now & Forever entered the film
festival circuit in 2002 and came away with
six awards. Mia Kirshner (see her in De Palma’s
upcoming film Black Dahlia) demonstrates
her impeccable acting range as she portrays
Angela's journey from the troubles of teenage
angst, to her innocent aspirations to become
an actress to the realizations of maturity.
Adam Beach (Smoke Signals) charmingly
plays John, a Cree Indian, whose undying love
for Angela plus his unrelenting aim to protect
her from her rogue boyfriend, T.J., has the
audience rooting for him to get the girl. Tootoosis’
ability to breathe life into his part as a concerned,
tender and intuitive male role model captivates
the audience.
With its romantic tale of love and a storybook
ending, Now & Forever is a little
like a movie of the week but it is definitely
the type of movie to watch with a date or with
the girls.
Now & Forever was directed by Bob
Clark. The screenwriter was Bill Boyle. It runs
for 101 minutes and it not rated.
Lori Silverbush
and Michael Skolnik's
On the Outs
IFC Center
Opens July 27, 2005
Starring: Anny Mariano; Paola Mendoza; Judy
Marte.
Reviewed by
Jessica Cogan
Teenage girls are amongst
the fastest growing prison populations in the
United States. It was this shocking fact that
prompted filmmakers Lori Silverbush and Michael
Skolnik to begin investigating these girls:
what are their lives like?; what crimes send
them to prison?; and what are the chances they’ll
stay out once released?
On the Outs is the
result of Silverbush and Skolnik’s research.
While the film is fictional, it draws on the
real-life experiences, voices and ideas of the
girls the filmmakers met in their many visits
to New Jersey juvenile correctional facilities.
On the Outs follows the stories of
three inner-city girls, from the same Jersey
City neighborhood, who struggle with their families,
the temptations and dangers of the street, and
the justice system.
Suzette (Anny Mariano) is
the straight-laced fifteen-year-old daughter
of an overprotective single mom who’s
trying to keep her kids on the straight and
narrow. But Suzette is hitting puberty and starting
to get noticed in the neighborhood. When she
meets neighborhood lothario Terrell (Clarence
“Don” Hutchinson), she develops
a serious and dangerous crush. She starts skipping
school and staying out all night with Terrell.
She becomes embroiled in his world of drugs
and violence, and soon enough, her choices get
her into serious, life-altering trouble that
even her mother can’t protect her from.
Marisol (played by Paola Mendoza,
one of the film’s co-creators) is a single
mom struggling to raise her baby while battling
a drug addiction. Often choosing her addiction
over her child, she eventually loses custody
to the state and learns she can only get her
daughter back if she stays clean. Worse still,
she finds out that the fight for custody may
take many years. Marisol is brokenhearted at
the prospect of losing her child forever, but
has trouble looking beyond her next fix –
and we’re left doubtful of a mother-daughter
reunion.
The film’s most compelling
story involves Oz (the brilliant Judy Marte),
a street-smart drug dealer who’s got a
good head on her shoulders and a world of trouble
at home with her strict grandmother, recovering
addict mom and disabled brother, Chuey (Dominic
Colon). When she’s not incarcerated, Oz
tries to be a good role model to her brother.
Sure, she sells drugs, but she never touches
the stuff herself. One senses that she has some
secret dream of getting out – a suspicion
confirmed by her story’s tragic but hopeful
conclusion.
On the Outs
is not a feel-good film, but it is a very good
one – and considering the statistics involving
young women and prison, an important one too.
There’s a reality, a freshness and rawness
to this film that make it both a difficult and
riveting watch. Add to that beautiful filmmaking
and great casting (especially in Judy Marte)
and you’ve got a film everyone should
see.
Making its debut at the 2004 Toronto International
Film Festival, On The Outs has had
an impressive year screening at over a dozen
film festivals at home and abroad while garnering
critical acclaim from audiences and media alike.
The film has also picked up a series of prestigious
awards including the IFP Independent Spirit
Awards nomination for Best Female Lead (Judy
Marte) and the John Cassavetes Award honoring
the best feature produced for under $500,000.
In addition to the IFP honors, On The Outs was
the first film in Slamdance Festival history
to be awarded both the Grand Jury Award and
Best Audience Award for Best Narrative Feature.
For tickets and times www.ifccenter.com.
212.924.7771
Daily Showtimes: 3:05pm, 6:45pm, 8:45pm, 10:45pm
Add'l Late Shows Fri/Sat: 12:30am
Add'l Matinees Mon-Fri: 11:35am, 1:20pm
IFC Center|6th
Ave. at W. 3rd Street
John G. Young’s
The Reception
Opens in New York on July 15, 2005
Starring: Pamela Holden Stewart
as Jeanette; Wayne Lamont Sims as Martin; Margaret
Burkwit as Sierra; Darien Sills-Evan as Andrew;
Chris Burmeister as Chuck.
Reviewed by Wendy R. Williams
at the 2005 Tribec Film
Festival
According to the press notes, The Reception
was made using the recipe so successfully employed
by Robert Rodriguez when he made his first film,
El Mariachi. Don’t wait for industry
funding - go with what you’ve got. Stir
in one frustrated young filmmaker (John G. Young),
one location (his country home) and a few of
the filmmaker’s actor-friends, plus a
check (or credit card available balance) for
$5,000 and - voila! - you have a film. And in
this case, a beautifully set and cast film,
because Mr. Young’s home is a Pottery-Barn
commercial and he is blessed with beautiful
friends.
The Reception tells the story of a
white woman, Jeanette (Pamela Holden Stewart),
who lives in a beautiful home in Roxybury, New
York. Jeanette has a black live-in, Martin (Wayne
Lamont Sims), who happens to be gay. One week,
Jeanette’s estranged daughter, Sierra
(Margaret Burkwit), comes for a visit, bringing
her new black fiancé, Andrew (Darien
Sills-Evan) - and the “fun” begins.
Mr. Young has provided the ingredients for an
interesting stew. Mother and daughter have issues,
mother and live-in have issues, and both of
the black men have an issue that has nothing
to do with their being black in this white world
of beautiful clapboard houses and pristine snow.
And all these “issues” are exacerbated
by the liberal amounts of alcohol being poured
into the pot.
The film is at its best when the actors are
interacting with each other; I totally believed
the relationships. The only criticism I would
offer is that the plot seems to be forced upon
the characters and they are made to make choices
that seem arbitrary and unnatural. An example
would be Sierra’s choice of a fiancé.
There were so many issues “left on the
table” by her choice of Andrew as her
take-home-to-Mama-guy that Andrew's main purpose
seems to have been only to supply the preconceived
end of the movie. But The Reception
is such a promising movie and some of these
problems could so easily be fixed by another
visit to the editing room (if the footage is
there) or perhaps another wonderful week in
beautiful Roxbury, New York. And, of course,
another credit card with some available room
for financing what is a very laudable endeavor.
Ingmar Bergman's
Saraband
Opening July 8, 2005
Reviewed by Frank J.
Avella
The forever enigmatic and
infinitely brilliant Ingmar Bergman has crafted
a final masterpiece to add to his plethora of
cinema classics that include: Smiles of
a Summer Night; Wild Strawberries;The
Seventh Seal; Persona; Cries
and Whispers; and Autumn Sonata...
just to name a few.
Saraband represents
the master’s self-admitted cinema swan
song and although he said the same about 1983’s
enchanting Fanny and Alexander, one
gets the impression the eighty-six-year-old
auteur is quite serious this time.
A sequel of sorts to his 1974
gem Scenes From a Marriage, Saraband
is a fascinating, searing and devastating examination
of relationships gone awry.
The film is segmented into
ten chapters as well as a prologue and epilogue
that feature Marianne (Liv Ullmann) going through
photos. She decides to pay her ex-husband, Johan
(Erland Josephson) a visit after a thirty-year
estrangement. They reminisce. Marianne soon
learns that Johan’s sixty-one-year-old
son, Henrik (Borje Ahlstedt) is living in his
lakeside cottage with his nineteen-year old
daughter, Karin (Julia Dufvenius). She is a
cellist. He is her instructor. Both are still
mourning the death of Henrik’s wife, Anna,
two years earlier.
Marianne soon finds herself
immersed in the emotional power struggles between
father, son and daughter. Johan loathes his
son and vice versa. Henrik is ferociously possessive
of his daughter and the two have a loving/torturous,
most likely incestuous relationship. Karin is
trying to break free from her father’s
stranglehold and Marianne is there to advise
and ultimately undergo her own much-needed catharsis.
Reprising Marianne after almost
thirty years, Liv Ullmann proves she is still
one of the greatest actresses of our time (anyone
fortunate enough to see Scenes or the
remarkable Face To Face knows how deeply
Ullmann can search into a character’s
soul). And while Marianne, as written, bears
little resemblance to the dynamic force she
was in Scenes, Ullmann manages to give
us a glimpse of her fire through her new role
as "therapist." It is a powerful performance
filled with nuance.
Erland Josephson’s Johan
is a swirl of angst, regret and longing. “I’ve
ransacked my past now that I have an answer
sheet,” he explains to Marianne, who asks
what he’s discovered. “That my life
is shit,” is his reply. Josephson’s
scenes with Ahlstedt are extraordinary - the
honest, intense hatred these two characters
feel chills the viewer to the bone. And Josephson
and Ullmann still have amazing chemistry together.
Dufvenius is quite a find
as Karin and she holds her own with this exceptional
ensemble.
One of Bergman’s legion
of amazing filmic gifts is the ability to make
talking heads riveting viewing. Saraband
unfolds like a play with much of the action
taking place indoors. Dialogue dominates the
film. And yet it is never dull and never uninteresting.
Bergman shot the film digitally and has insisted
that it must be shown using digital equipment.
No one can accuse Bergman
of mellowing with age. Saraband is
brutal and unmerciful. And that is refreshing
given today’s desperate need for whimsy
onscreen. Trust me: Strindberg has nothing on
Bergman. Yet, in the end, there is hope...bleak
as it may seem...
Jonathan Jakubowicz's
Secuestro Express
Spanish with English Subtitles
Opens August 5, 2005
Reviewed by Wendy R.
Williams
Starring: Mía Maestro;
Carlos Julia Molena; Rubén Blades; Pedro
Perez; Carlos Madera; Jean Paul Leroux.
“Get in the car or I’ll
blow your fucking head off!“ These words
symbolize the terror that is faced every day
by the rich of Latin America. Their lives are
permeated with the gut-wrenching fear that just
around any corner will be a gang of predators,
drug-crazed thugs who will 'jack them and try
to turn them into their next "paycheck."
Here is a quote from the press
release of Miramax’s Secuestro Express:
“Every sixty minutes a person is abducted
in Latin America. 70% of the victims do not
survive. Secuestro Express is the frightening
story of one young couple's ordeal as they careen
through the underbelly of Caracas, Venezuela
in the hands of three thugs who've made them
their latest payday.
"Carla (Maestro) and
Martin (Leroux) are a young upper-class couple
fresh off of a night of dancing and partying
when they cross paths with Trece (Molina), Budu
(Perez) and Niga (Madera), three men who make
their living by kidnapping unwitting young adults
to extort quick money from their wealthy parents.
"Carla and Martin become
their next victims and are sent on a terrifying
overnight journey through Caracas as they wait
for Carla's father Sergio (Blades) to hand over
twenty thousand dollars - a small amount for
a rich Caraqueno, but the equivalent of almost
five years of the Venezuelan minimum wage.”
Secuestro was filmed
with hand-held video cameras and the jerky reality
of video gives the movie a documentary feel,
adding to the unrelenting terror of the scenes.
Video brings an immediacy to a movie, allowing
each scene to escalate to hysterical levels.
The audience is totally there with the characters
- taking every harrowing breath together as
one.
And the actors are completely
believable, every one of them. I felt the panic
of Carla (Mía Maestro) and Martin (Jean
Paul Leroux) as they were confronted with such
monstrous thugs as Trece (Carlos Molina), Budu
(Pedro Perez) and Niga (Carlos Madera). It must
be truly horrific to live in such a place and
to know there is no one to help you - that you're
held helpless in a country where even the police
are in on the kidnapping game.
Secuestro Express
rises to new heights of in-your-face gory violence.
So, if you ever wanted to know exactly what
it feels like to ride the world’s highest
roller coaster or be kidnapped by a group of
drug-crazed thugs, this is the film for you
- a chance to enjoy the thrill of being utterly
terrorized from the comfort of a multiplex movie
seat.
Secuestro Express
is rated R (for strong violence, drug use, sexuality
and language).
Official Website: Miramax.com/SecuestroExpress
The night I saw the movie,
the Venezuelan author/director, Jonathan Jakubowicz,
was there for Q & A. He spoke to us about
how happy he was to have been able to create
a Venezuelan movie that is going to have such
huge international distribution. Then he told
us he had made the movie with a social purpose
in mind and that this goal was to portray the
rich and poor of Venezuela, to show how the
other side lives and thinks. He also said he
felt the people of Venezuela needed to come
together and solve their own problems through
social change - and that Latin American governments
have never been able to solve anything and he
was very pleased to be a “catalyst”
for this change. Oh!
These were very lofty ambitions
for this film, but was I surprised to hear them
from this director. Before Jakubowicz spoke,
I had been saying to myself, “Wow, this
movie is going to make a shit-load of money.
It is the most politically incorrect film I
have ever seen - Scarface pales in
comparison.” And, “Hmm, I wonder
if the ‘good’ thugs in Venezuela
are going to picket the movie, outraged at the
way they were portrayed?”
But after he spoke, I had
another thought: Things must be really bad in
Venezuela for the filmmakers to be so inured
to the overwhelming effect of the violence in
this film. And sure enough, Jakubowicz, the
writer/director, had once been kidnapped himself
- and he just mentioned this in passing, as
if it were a trivial, everyday matter. So, I
guess Jakubowicz is right. The people of Venezuela
definitely do need to talk, and talk
a lot - and perhaps we do too.
Maurizio Benazzo and
Nick Day's
Short Cut to Nirvana
July 5- August 26
Rubin Museum
Reviewed by Armistead Johnson
With the
recent scandals of the Catholic Church, the debate
about whether or not the Ten Commandments should
be in public government spaces and the almost
goofy, yet always public, faith of our president,
it would be safe to say that skepticism of religion
and faith is running high in our country right
now.
Short Cut
to Nirvana is not a movie about religion
(nor is it about a 90’s grunge band.)