
Debra Granik’s
Down to the Bone
Opened November 25, 2005
Quad Cinema
34 West 13th Street New York, New York
Starring: Vera
Farmiga; Hugh Dillon; Clint Jordan; Caridad 'La
Bruja'
De La Luz; Jasper Daniels; and Taylor Foxhall
Reviewed by Eleanor
Goldberg
Dark, depressing
and harrowingly realistic, Debra Granik’s,
Down to
the Bone, tells the compelling story of a
suburban mother’s drug
induced decline, with no neat happily-ever-after
conclusion in sight.
Unhappily married
and a mother of two young boys, Irene (Vera
Farmiga) struggles to sustain her passionless
marriage, while
discreetly and regularly using cocaine to relieve
her misery. Irene’s
painstaking dependence is methodically revealed
in a series of heart
wrenching scenes, one of which being when she
offers to pay her drug
dealer with her son’s meager birthday money.
Reaching the point
of sheer desperation, Irene admits herself into
a
drug rehabilitation facility that mirrors the
drab and dull existence from
which she is trying to escape. Granik finally
injects some much-needed
humor onto the scene, as the fellow patients work
towards their
recovery and engage in interpretive and therapeutic
classes.
While at the facility,
Irene develops a steamy affair with Bob
(Hugh Dillon), a nurse and former drug addict
and the two rely on
each other’s tenuous recovery to stay sober.
However, once Irene leaves
the facility, the film takes an unpredictable
turn when one of them
relapses and drives the other to revert to their
old, self-destructive
ways.
Vera Farmiga and
Hugh Dillon deliver stellar performances throughout
and lend the film the element of tragedy on which
it thrives. Vera
Farmiga will next appear opposite Paul Walker
in Running Scared,
in January 2006 and is currently filming Departed,
a police drama
starring Matt Damon and Leonardo DiCaprio. Hugh
Dillon starred in
Bruce McDonald’s Hard Core Lego
and starred opposite Ethan
Hawke in Assault on Precinct 13.
The strength in
this film lies in Farmiga’s portrayal of
Irene’s poignant
and excruciating suffering, which she conveys
with gifted subtlety and
quietude. A mere cock of her head and a half smile
reveals the mounds
of deep seeded pain and quelled rage which she
is desperately trying
to release.
The cinematography
further enhances the dreariness and the banality
of each scene, as the camera vividly captures
the endless snow fall, the
dullness of Irene’s town and the dilapidated
nature of her home.
The camera retains the film’s integrity
by continuously focusing on
the ordinariness of the events and people and
objects that comprise
this very real film.
The film also succeeds
in raising questions about the nature of
patriotism and the ways in which the working class
is overlooked in
American society. At the core of this movie lies
the question of how
the very poor, leading redundant and colorless
lives are expected to
find meaningful and healthful outlets with very
little means.
Honored with Best
Director and a Special Jury Prize for Acting at
the
2004 Sundance Film Festival, Down to the Bone
shies away from
histrionics and is replete with genuine emotion,
profound symbolism
and the stark reminder that for every recovering
addict, each day marks
a new and unchartered challenge.

Craig Lucas'
The Dying Gaul
Opens November 4, 2005
Landmark's Sunshine Cinema
143 East Houston Street, New York
Reviewed by Frank
J. Avella on June 28, 2005
at the Lincoln Center
Tribute to Campbell Scott
The Dying Gaul
represents the impressive directorial debut of
acclaimed playwright, Craig Lucas (Prelude
to a Kiss, Reckless). Lucas, who
has also penned a few screenplays (Longtime
Companion, The Secret Lives of Dentists)
seems a natural behind the camera and his filmic
initiation is, for the most part, a triumph.
The Dying Gaul
(adapted by Lucas from his stage play) is simultaneously
an indictment of the avarice and hedonism of Hollywood
as well as a meditation on the dangers of deception,
self and otherwise.
Peter Sarsgaard
plays Robert, a struggling screenwriter who finally
snags an opportunity to sell a script and pocket
a million dollars. The problem is that the studio
insists he change a key character from male to
female, killing any homosexual angle and, in turn,
bastardizing and commercializing Robert’s
very personal project.
Robert eventually
capitulates and finds himself sexually seduced
by Jeffrey (Campbell Scott), the powermad studio
head - they embark on a toxic affair despite the
fact that Jeffrey has a wife, Elaine (Patricia
Clarkson) and two children.
Through an enveloping
and elaborate set of plot points, Elaine discovers
that Robert and Jeffrey are having an affair,
sparking a series of astonishing and shattering
events that forever change our three protagonists.
The success of
the film hinges on the strength of the three lead
actors - and Lucas is savvy enough to have cast
his work to perfection.
Peter Sarsgaard
is playfully sexy, intensely intriguing and downright
creepy as the grieving writer, who proves, ironically,
to be the ultimate survivor.
Indie queen and
thesp-extraordinaire, Patricia Clarkson, tackles
the complex role of fascinated friend/scorned
wife with admirable aplomb and is fearlessly triumphant
in etching a nuanced portrait of a frustrated
artist forced into stagnation.
The most difficult
role is that of Jeffrey - and the genius in Campbell
Scott’s portrayal is that he could have
easily opted for the cliches normally associated
with a studio head (greedy, artistically-challenged,
non-intellectual). Instead, Scott gives us an
authentic person who has become morally bankrupt
by the Hollyworld he must exist in - yet somehow
he isn't quite lost yet. Jeffrey struggles with
his dual nature, artistically and sexually. In
many respects, he’s a true bisexual. He
is a control freak who is, himself, spinning out
of control - and Scott knows just when to turn
it up then tone it down. It is a deeply penetrating
and affecting performance.
The Dying Gaul
is a visual feast. Cinematographer Bobby
Bukowski exquisitely captures the chilly, spiritually-vapid
world of contemporary Hollywood.
Lucas proves to
be such an assured director (the continuous sense
of foreboding is downright chilling) that one
can forgive the all-too-abrupt ending followed
by a coda that should have had more of a sting.
Regardless, he
and the Gaul crew should be commended
for creating a devastating piece of cinema that
never compromises. And how rare is that in the
US in 2005?
Jim Sheridan’s
Get Rich or Die Tryin’
Opens November 9, 2005
Starring: 50 Cent, Adewale
Akinnuoye-Agbaje, Joy Bryant, Terrence Howard
Reviewed by Wendy R. Williams
Shakespeare is alive and running
through the streets of Queens. And it’s
the Shakespeare of the hip-hop hood, lived by
a throw-down man named Fifty Cent (Curtis Jackson)
and interpreted by an Irishman named Jim Sheridan,
the director of films like In America,
In the Name of the Father and My
Left Foot.
Fifty needed to get his story
out to the world and Sheridan loved rap music,
so they were a natural fit. Another fit was
the screenwriter, Terrence Winter, the Executive
Producer and Writer for The Sopranos.
Going from The Sopranos to the hood
was not that much of a change, because crime
is crime, you just need to change the names,
the settings and the dialects.
So they collaborated to tell
the story of a crack-dealer-turned-rapper named
Marcus, a character and story loosely based
on Fifty’s own life and courageously played
by Fifty himself. It is the same story as told
in Eminem’s 8 Mile and Craig
Brewer’s Hustle and Flow. But
in life there are rarely new stories and the
genius always lies in the telling. All the elements
of great drama are present: the search for the
father; the death of the dark prince, Majestic
(stunningly played by Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje);
redemption through the love of a woman, Charlene
(beautifully played by Joy Bryant); the help
of the loyal sidekick, Bama (the always terrific
Terrence Howard); and redemption through love
of something both inside and outside yourself
– the music.
There is also a hell of a
scary/funny fight-in-the-prison-shower-scene
with a bunch of naked guys (including Fifty
and Terrence) sliding around on wet rubber mats,
bumping into walls - well you just have to see
it. This story is very violent; it starts with
a brutal robbery and ends with the character
taking great risks to expose both himself and
his music. But like other great stories, there
is love and change and redemption. And most
of all, there is a chance for the audience to
see the life and culture that has been responsible
for the birth of an American musical phenomena
- hip-hop.
Howard Ramis’
The Ice Harvest
Opening November 23, 2005
She done
him wrong!
Reviewed by Wendy R. Williams
Starring: John Cusack,
Billy Bob Thornton, Randy Quaid, Connie Nielson
and Oliver Platt
It’s Christmas Eve in
Kansas City and both the roads and the souls
are frozen and slippery. This is the world of
Harold Ramis’ new film, The Ice Harvest,
a funny sick place filled with morally corrupt
lawyers, Midwest crime bosses and strippers.
Here is a quote from the film’s
press release: “It’s Christmas Eve
in rainy, icebound Wichita, Kansas, and this
year Charlie Arglist (John Cusack) just might
have something to celebrate. Charlie, an attorney
for the sleazy businesses of Wichita, and his
unsavory associate, the steely Vic Cavanaugh
(Billy Bob Thornton), have just successfully
embezzled $2,147,000 from Kansas City boss Bill
Guerrard (Randy Quaid). Even so, the real prize
for Charlie would be the stunning Renata (Connie
Nielsen), who runs the Sweet Cage strip club.
Charlie’s fondest Christmas wish is to
slip out of town with Renata. But, as daylight
fades and a storm whirls, everyone from Charlie’s
drinking buddy Pete Van Heuten (Oliver Platt)
to the local police begin to wonder just what
exactly is in Charlie’s Christmas stocking.
For Charlie, the 12 hours of Christmas Eve are
filled with nonstop twists and turns, both on
the ice and off.”
Ramis’ Ice
film belongs in the same violent, twisted, noir,
buddy-film genre as Shane Black’s hysterical
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (with Robert Downey
Junior and Val Kilmer clowning around in a Christmas
themed Los Angeles). In both films, the good
guys are just the rotten apples with the least
spots. But in Ice, John Cusack’s
character, Charlie, is hard pressed to even
keep a buddy. Some of his so-called friends
and associates want to kill him and his only
true friend keeps falling into a drunken stupor.
All the Ice performances
are stellar. I totally believed John Cusack
as the morally corrupt Charlie. Billy Bob Thornton
took a step away from his usual thug-with-a-heart-of-gold
character to portray a truly frightening mobster.
Connie Nielson did an amazing Jessica Rabbit
like strip club manager, but this time Jessica
wasn't just drawn bad – she’s plain
old fashioned bad. And Oliver Platt, who I have
so loved-to-hate as a hard charging White House
Counsel on The West Wing, does an amazing
turn as an unlucky-in-love drunk.
Howard Ramis has done a great job of depicting
the opposite-of-Christmas. According to the
film notes, the film was actually shot in the
suburbs of Chicago. But Chicago or not, the
Kansas City of this film is gorgeous bleak town
with an as-painted-by-Edward-Hopper look about
it. And it would be worth the price of the ticket
simply to see Charlie's former home, an all
white 1950's modern bungalow decorated with
a white plastic Christmas tree. It looks as
souless as an ice cube and is the perfect metaphor
for this film.
Sam
Mendes'
Jarhead
Opens November 4, 2005
Starring: Jake
Gyllenhaal; Jamie Foxx; Peter Sarsgaard; Jacob
Vargas;
Skyler Stone; Wade Williams; Katherine Randolph.
Reviewed by Terry Maloney
If you buy a ticket
to this film expecting to see a typical war movie
filled with battle scenes and lots of blood and
guts, you will be sorely disappointed in Jarhead.
Actually, the only up close and personal fatality
occurs early in the film during a training exercise!
This two-hour film is the very personal true story
of former marine Anthony Swafford (Jake Gyllenhaal)
and is based on his best-selling book of the same
name.
Not exactly a recruiting
commercial for the Marine Corps (even the film's
title is offensive to marines unless used among
themselves), Oscar-winning director Sam Mendes
(American Beauty) had no official cooperation
from the corps in the making of this film, rather
two former marine sergeants (and Swafford, I assume)
provided the technical assistance.
The story, which
starts in 1989, follows colege dropout Swafford
to boot camp where he is greeted by the typical
screaming D.I., a role created by Lou Gossett,
Jr. in An Officer and a Gentleman (even
some of the lines sounded familiar.) Following
boot camp, he is selected for sniper training
by Staff Sergeant Sykes, a role brilliantly played
by Oscar winner Jamie Foxx (Ray). Soon,
Swafford's platoon is off to Saudi Arabia to join
the forces of Operation Desert Shield.
For a film released
during another Iraq-US conflict, Jarhead is strangely
non-political. There are a few references to the
arming of Sadaam by the US during the Iran-Iraq
war, and the inevitable comment about "war
for oil," but Swafford's buddy Troy (Peter
Saarsgard) typifies the attitude of the platoon
when he says, "(Screw) the politics! We're
here and that's that, so shut the (hell) up!"
The strongest scenes
in the film include a "friendly fire"
incident when the platoon is attacked in Kuwait
by two A-10s (although strangely bloodless), the
total destruction they witness along the "highway
of death," and a long-anticipated sniper
opportunity when shooter Swaford and spotter Troy
target an Iraqi officer in an airport control
tower.
Jarhead
is beautifully filmed, particulary the scenes
among the oil field fires and the closeups of
handsome Gyllenhaal, whose character grows from
a dopey, clueless green marine, to a professional,
if rather cynical, warrior. Along with his buddy
Troy, Swafford brings a sense of decency to a
situation where one's moral compass is far from
a fixed thing.
The film, however,
is never downbeat and is filled with humorous
moments including an accidental flare detonation,
an impromptu strip tease by the platoon for a
TV crew and Swafford's bugle-less renditions of
revilee and a Stevie Wonder tune.
All three lead
actors give outstanding performances, with Foxx
possibly headed for another Oscar nomination,
this time in the supporting category. Also, Chris
Cooper (Seabiscuit) and Dennis Haystert
(24), are excellent in minor roles as
senior officers.
In a poignant voiceover,
Swafford talks about holding a rifle as the most
significant thing a marine will ever do with his
hands, "no matter if later on he uses them
to love a woman, or to change his baby's diapers."
As a haggard-looking
Vietnam War veteran comes aboard the platoon's
bus back in California to welcome them home, Swafford's
final voiceover is heard: "All wars are different,
and all wars are the same."
This is a film
that can be enjoyed by former marines (even if
some may not admit it), Desert Shield/Storm veterans,
and anyone with an interest in the making of marines,
military life in general, or how the prospect
of war and sudden death (or heroism) can change
a person.
There is a lot
to admire about this film, and if you don't mind
the lack of combat scenes, you will enjoy Jarhead.
No, this is not the Full Metal Jacket
of Desert Storm. It's much more like a "lite"
version of Deer Hunter, only with a lot
more laughs.
(Rated R
for profanity and scenes of charred corpses.)
Marc
Levin’s
Protocols of Zion
Opens October 21, 2005
Reviewed by Wendy
R. Williams
The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion was a hoax, a one-hundred-year-old
book about the Jewish plot to dominate the world
which was purportedly written by Czar Alexander’s
secret police. But like all evil, it had an
afterlife, fueled by the internet and disseminated
by word of mouth. Until very recently, Protocols
was sold at Wall Mart and it still can
be purchased at Amazon.com (along with many
other books that debunk the myth).
Marc Levin was inspired to
make his documentary film, Protocols of
Zion, after an Egyptian cab driver told
him that no Jews had died in the World Trade
Center; that all four thousand (where did that
number come from?) had received a warning to
stay home from work that day. When Levin questioned
the cab driver, the driver told him that this
was all part of a plot that was outlined in
the “book,” the book being The
Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
So, with his father (Al Levin) in tow, Levin
plunged into the fray - interviewing: Christian
Evangelicals; Aryan Skinheads (in a suit and
rep tie); the publisher of the Jew Watch website;
Black nationalists; and Palestinians. With a
charming conversational style (similar to Michael
Moore), he went everywhere - including prison
yards and the Arab dominated Patterson New Jersey.
And surprisingly, everyone talked to him. And
they talked about the book, whether they had
read it or not (many of the zealots who liberally
quoted the “book” did not seem to
have actually read it).
But Levin does not stop there;
his documentary is definitely an all inclusive.
He throws in Mel Gibson’s Passion
of Christ, old Nazi propaganda films and
an Egyptian Television and Hezbollah TV’s
mini series based on the Protocols
in which the “Elders” are portrayed
as blood thirsty vampires, eager for the blood
of young Christians. He even films himself standing
in a Los Angeles hotel room, trying unsuccessfully
to get some of the “Jewish leaders”
of Hollywood (Larry David, Aaron Spelling, and
Rob Reiner) to meet with him and be interviewed
for his documentary.
The documentary ends up being
an informative but charming mishmash, with a
little something for everyone. While the film
does not have follow a strong through-line to
debunk the Protocols (any thinking
person should be able to do that without outside
help), it does tell the story about how a little
evil can go a long way and how “the pen
can be mightier than the sword.” And hopefully,
it also tells a story about how a little film
can have an afterlife - debunking a myth.
Kiyoshi
Kurosawa
Pulse
Opens November 9, 2005
Reviewed by Brian
Shirey
If you’ve been
sitting in a dark room for the last 5 or 6
years… get out of there! In the meanwhile,
you alone will be surprised to hear how much
Asian culture has influenced mainstream American
film. It’s in action movies, most notably
through all those “cool, dude”
martial arts moves shown by Keanu in The
Matrix flicks, or by Uma in Kill
Bill. In dramas, we’ve seen thoughtful
trips to Japan in Lost in Translation
and The Last Samurai, and this X-mas
brings Memoirs of a Geisha.
But then we have that other
reliable genre, the horror film, which in
Hollywood lately has been comprised of either
regrettable remakes (House of Wax,
Texas Chainsaw) or… Japanese
film remakes. Dark Water, The
Rings, and The Grudge were all
adapted for Western audiences from Japanese
originals. And to their credit, they introduced
a new kind of horror, much more creepy and
intense, and much less gory and jump-out-at-you
scary. Now, IFC Center puts the trend into
perspective with the US debut (opening Nov.
9) of the unsettling Pulse, one of
the original Japanese (J-horror) fright-fests
that started it all.
Released in Japan in 2001,
Pulse dramatizes the aftermath when
one of a group of young friends commits suicide.
No note is left behind. However, a floppy
disc is found in the dead man’s Tokyo
condo and Michi, our resourceful genre heroine,
boots it up to show strange images that seem
to bring him back to life –- plus a
series of other people wallowing in dark solitude.
A parallel storyline follows Kawashima, a
young man whose computer shows similar creepy
video. He goes to a woman, a tech expert,
and together they get wrapped up in what unfolds
as a richly atmospheric ghost story. Pulse
doesn’t really mix the two investigations
smoothly – the movie spooks around all
over the place – but a growing sense
of dread does start to creep under the skin.
Directed by Kiyoshi Kurosawa,
one of Japan’s hot new filmmakers (and
not related to Akira), Pulse is exciting
because – similar to The Ring
– it finds innovative ways to create
the nuts and bolts of horror. Instead of white
sheets, creaking doors and haunted houses,
we see shadows on computer monitors and wispy
shapes lurking inside strangely sterile, modern
city apartments. Also, at practically every
moment, incredible attention is paid to how
the “ghosts” move. The scene when
a wraith-like woman gyrates off of a wall,
much to the dismay of one of the film’s
wimpier characters, is haunting just because
her behavior is so unexpected.
In the category of the
expected, however, is the fact that the script
for Pulse weakens as it goes along. See The
Grudge for further study, a film in which
placing the ghost ever so carefully in the
frame –- in a stairwell, behind a window,
under the bed, through an elevator –-
becomes a creative concern far greater than
dramatic logic. I appreciate Kurosawa’s
respect for the trickeries of moviemaking;
indeed, the control of craft may be what makes
these J-horror films so captivating. In Pulse,
even the girl pushing the book cart in the
library looks ghostly. But the story of the
film doesn’t carry it. I found myself
marveling at perfectly dreadful bits of action…
that didn’t lead to much.
Still, those were the only
times I felt cheated. The climax between the
principal characters, coolly set in a fantastic
abandoned factory, mixes scares and emotions
in equal measure. We come to understand Michi
and Kawashima in a certain way. There’s
a depth here that Kurosawa has earned not
just through his moody style, but also in
guiding the appealing lead performances. To
its credit, Pulse ultimately uses a high body
count – and their tormented spirits
– to reflect fascinatingly on issues
of disconnectedness (via computer!), loneliness
and the afterlife that most horror films never
attempt. On top of that, Pulse is
curious as a portrait of a modern Japan that
is over-populated to the point of bursting.
In that equation, what role does suicide play,
and what kind of ghosts result from it?
This just in: A Hollywood
remake of Pulse is in the works,
due in 2006. I was guessing Lindsay Lohan,
but they’ve gotten Kristen Bell of TV’s
“Veronica Mars.” Just spare yourself
and see the original instead.