|
|
Carlos
Reygadas's
Battle in Heaven
Opens Friday, February
17, 2005
Landmark Sunshine Cinemas
143 East Houston Street
on the Lower East Side
New York City
Reviewed
by Brian Shirey
Astonishing and abrupt, Battle in Heaven
is a Mexican film arrived straight off the international
film fest circuit. Recently screened in Rotterdam
(where I visited for a few days), it was an absolute
sensation. They don’t hold back in Holland:
The film’s European poster, a young woman
naked and flat on her back, adorned every wall
of every cinema in town. (They cleaned it up in
the US – her long hair now covers certain
strategic spots.) It’s a blunt image from
an uncompromising movie. Battle in Heaven
is a sexually explicit and artistically daring
affront: Not escapist, not pleasant, not conventional…
and completely unforgettable.
As a movie lover, I‘m impatient with films
-- common in foreign-language and indie cinema
-- that wallow in ugliness as a way to assure
us of their significance and integrity. (In other
words, “We’re not Hollywood.”)
Initially, Battle in Heaven flirts with
this approach. Directed by 2nd-timer Carlos Reygadas,
it tells the sweaty story of Marcos, the “fatso”
chauffeur of a Mexican general who is also expected
to drive Ana, the boss’s luscious and misbehaved
daughter. She has a secret: Prostitution. (Just
for kicks, of course, because daddy is rich.)
Marcos’ facilitates her double life, and
in so doing, finds himself variably fantasizing
about and actually engaging in a sexual relationship
with her. (The film opens with graphic fellatio.)
He is married to an unattractive woman who sells
junk in a train station, and we see their sex
life, too. Reygadas shows the couple in a love
scene that is the most unglamorous I’ve
ever seen in a film… in my life.
Had enough? I thought I did, but the film’s
visual style creeps under the skin, even after
one too many close-ups of Marcos’ heaving
body. He’s perpetually inexpressive and
disturbed. But the camera is alive to him, forcing
us to see a man who would otherwise go unnoticed.
Battle in Heaven is deeply concerned
with this classic loser, who may remind some of
sociopaths like Travis Bickle from Taxi Driver.
But is there really a screw loose, or is he just
building rage against the surroundings that continually
oppress him?
You can feel his burden. Battle in Heaven
is extraordinary, and unsettlingly certain, in
showing a Mexico City sagging under overpopulation
and abject poverty. Startling, for instance, is
a lengthy shot of a sedan stopped at a gas station,
and we watch as some 12 family members –
including grandma – get out, one by one.
It’s not a clown joke. A Bach chamber piece
underscores the moment, a sad human spectacle
off-set by the sublime. This is the world Marcos
lives in, where pilgrimages to the city Basilica
unite the poor masses and military maneuvers take
place late at night.
It all catches up to our “hero” when,
after an intensely observed attack of conscience,
Marcos confesses a failed kidnapping scheme to
Ana. Let’s face it – in the annals
of crime, it’s not the smartest thing to
try, but Mexico has been plagued by kidnapping-for-profit
in recent years (see the Denzel film Man on
Fire), and now amateurs are following the
example set by the professionals. For Reygadas,
it’s a spotlight on the way a desperate
man can lose moral focus.
Here’s a warning -- Reygadas is not very
interested in story once this set-up is established.
In fact, he cites Iranian director Abbas Kiarostami
as a favorite influence, because “with a
facial expression, a camera angle, and some music,
he tells you everything. That to me is the purest
form of cinema.” For this reviewer, the
case can not be overstated. Battle in Heaven
will tax the patience of those who want the next
juicy plot point, but all others take notice:
This is a seriously powerful piece of cinema.
Sometimes infuriating, sometimes pornographic,
and documentary-like in its realism, the film
follows a man searching for redemption in a crowded
metropolis that seems to have passed him by. In
Battle in Heaven, you’ll be asked to
look as the camera does a slow 360 pan around
a seedy neighborhood, and to listen to a bombastic
coronation march as a stark sex scene dissolves
into the national pride of a soccer game. The
music – another dazzling choice –
underlines a sadness that is individual, national…
and epic.
The actors are non-professionals given sparse
dialogue, but that’s OK because the cinematographer
– ace pro Diego Martinez Vignetti –
uses grand shots as if they were achingly recited
monologues. Marcos is Marcos Hernandez, an actual
Mexico City driver who is also (as in real life,
according to the press notes) preternaturally
quiet. As Ana, Anapola Mushkadiz captures both
the girl’s brattiness, and her rather skewed
affection for Marcos. The suggestion is that she
understands their similarities.
Earlier this decade, Mexico produced two striking
and stylistically innovative films, Amores
Perros and Y Tu Mama Tambien. The
latter may be remembered for its frank sexuality,
played out against a road trip that shows a Mexico
seemingly dying before our eyes. In Battle
in Heaven, we see the forgotten souls of
a population torn between need and faith. The
almost religious attention given to Marcos and
Ana’s highly class-conscious sex scenes
are perhaps too intense; certainly, Reygadas is
determined to wake us up to the pathology of this
sad man. In the end, I see compassion more than
mere provocation.
You decide for yourself. As an arthouse experience
in the glut of the politically correct Oscar season,
it’s the most audacious movie out there.
Ang Lee's
Brokeback Mountain
Opens Friday, December 9, 2005
Starring: Heath
Ledger; Jake Gyllenhaal; Linda Cardellini; Anna
Faris; Anne Hathaway; Michelle Williams; and Randy
Quaid.
Reviewed by Frank J. Avella
Brokeback Mountain
is an audacious piece of cinema--an atypical love
story that soars above most of the films of 2005.
The lead characters happen to be male. The men
happen to be cowboys. The cowboys happen to fall
in love...with each other! The time period, which
feels like a century ago, is actually the early
1960’s into the early 1980’s. And
the place is Wyoming (and Texas) where not much
has changed in a century in terms of social acceptance
or intellectual development, which is probably
why it feels like such a period piece. (I completely
own up to AND am proud of the Blue state bias
obvious in the last sentence.)
Beautifully scripted
by Larry McMurtry (Lonesome Dove) and
Diana Ossana, based on a short story by Annie
Proulx, the spare plot involves the meeting of
two ranch hands, who are hired to tend sheep on
Brokeback Mountain. The brooding, laconic Ennis
Del Mar (Heath Ledger) and the animated, aptly
named Jack Twist (Jake Gyllenhaal) soon find themselves
with ample amounts of alone-time. An intense sexual
attraction begins to develop - one that neither
truly comprehend. That infatuation soon metamorphoses
into deep love, which they understand even less.
Once Ennis and
Jack leave their beloved mountain, they are forced
into respective fake “real-life” existences.
Both marry and have children, but four years later
they meet up again and begin an infrequent, but
intense affair.
Heath Ledger is
a revelation as Ennis. Nothing this actor has
done in the past (even his powerful, if too brief,
turn in Monster’s Ball) indicated
he was capable of such a rich, nuanced, heartbreaking
performance. Ledger crawls deep under the skin
of this seemingly simple rancher and tears open
the painful yearning he can’t understand
or control. Ledger’s acting is so raw and
honest it flabbergasts the viewer. This is the
acting performance of the year, one the Academy
cannot overlook.
Because Ledger
is so extraordinary, it would be easy to underestimate
the power of Jake Gyllenhaal’s work. Although
the film doesn’t seem to devote the same
time and tenderness to Jack Twist’s world
as it does to Ennis’, Gyllenhaal is fearless
in his approach and nails the hurt, desire and
defiance of someone who doesn’t fit in the
time and place he was born into...and doesn’t
quite understand why--nor does he know how he’s
supposed to behave.
The film more than
hints that Jack falls victim to his untimate insistance
on being himself sexually, but the true victim
is Ennis since he never fully embrace his desires.
The wonderful supporting
cast is led by an indelible Michelle WIlliams
as Ennis’ distraught wife. Anne Hathaway
impresses in a part that is too underwritten.
Anna Faris and Linda Cardellini leave their respective
marks in smaller roles. And Roberta Maxwell manages
to be penetrating and heart-wrenching in an brief
but potent scene.
Ang Lee’s
direction is deft and uncompromising. He has proven
before in gems such as Sense and Sensibility,
The Ice Storm and Crouching Tiger,
Hidden Dragon, that he can take on practically
any subject matter and capture it’s true
essence. This may be his best work.
Gustavo Santaolalla’s
score is gorgeous and perfectly suits the film.
The picture is
stunningly photographed by Rodrigo Prieto. From
its sweeping mountain vistas to Ennis’ simple
farmhouse, Prieto allows the audience to feel
as if they are actually there with the characters,
not just onlookers.
We also get the
sense of heartland inertia necessary to believe
that such backward views could exist in the turbulent
and sexually-liberating milieu of the sixties
and seventies. The irony being that if Matthew
Shepard’s death taught us anything it’s
that these dangerous and repressive mores exist
and, actually, thrive today.
Brokeback Mountain
represents quite a historic leap for a film dealing
with homosexuality. And although the film shouldn’t
be labeled a “gay film,” it is quite
a landmark film in it’s unabashed sincerity
with it’s portrayal of ‘the love that
dare not speak it’s name!’
Not since the soapy
debacle Making Love in 1982 has a mainstream
film dealt so openly with love between two men.
That film was far too careful and contrite with
cardboard characters and whiny protagonists, directed
and scripted in a pathetically self-important
Hollywood-ized style. Philadelphia’s
lovers were never allowed to actually show any
real love towards one another. Even many a gay-themed
indie are sanitized, politically-correct concoctions
carefully made so as not to offend anyone or twinkie
flesh-laced sex comedies that have as as much
depth as Paris Hilton has.
The remarkable
achievement of Brokeback Mountain is
that it is daring because it allows its characters
to be real and behave in a painfully honest manner.
For that and for making a brilliant and groundbreaking
film, Focus Features and the entire Brokeback
team should be congratulated, showered with
accolades and, most importantly, the film itself
should been seen and appreciated.
Jeff Feuerzeig's
The Devil and Daniel Johnston
Opens March 31, 2006
Reviewed by Brian Shirey
Have you ever heard of Daniel Johnston? That’s
been my question this week after seeing the
extraordinary new documentary film about his
life, The Devil and Daniel Johnston.
Singer, songwriter, graphic artist, and complete
creative genius, he’s been flying under
the radar of notoriety for the last 20 years,
ever since appearing on MTV’s “Cutting
Edge” back in 1985. In his time, he has
written and performed hundreds of songs, released
over ten full-length albums, and shown thousands
of his vibrant drawings at exhibitions all over
the world. Still doesn’t ring a bell?
There’s one major detail I’ve left
out: Daniel Johnston suffers from severe manic
depression.
The Devil and Daniel Johnston is the
most important film about the relationship between
creativity and mental illness since Terry Zwigoff’s
Crumb. (Which, by the way, is one of
the best documentaries of the 1990’s.)
In that film, Robert Crumb’s brother,
a graphic artist who also happened to be institutionalized,
virtually stole the show from his famous sibling
with his never-before-seen, insanely detailed
drawings. But Devil might be even better,
because director Jeff Feuerzeig has total access
to a mind-boggling array of films, audiotape,
video and original artwork straight from Daniel
Johnston himself. Brilliantly organized, the
film parades the life of a young man for whom
self-expression had no limits… even in
the face of depression and self-destruction.
Feuerzeig doesn’t give us a clinical framework
regarding bipolar disorder, but the disease
works itself into the fabric of the film, both
as a subject and as a style. From the minute
he was able to hold a pen, Daniel Johnston created.
Starting with sketches, then moving to a piano
keyboard, and eventually shooting short films,
he confused his Christian fundamentalist parents,
who thought he wasn’t doing anything useful
with his life. Just to make sure we get the
idea, Feuerzeig plays Daniel’s mischievously
recorded audiotapes of his mother’s rants
against his “unprofitable” ways.
It’s hilarious, and a primal theme --
the movie constantly connects to the obstacles
laid in front of creative people. But when we
hear from Daniel’s parents in present-day
interviews, they talk about how their youngest
child’s illness dawned on them, and Devil
generates deep empathy.
This is The Devil and Daniel Johnston
in a nutshell: Happily assured of Daniel’s
brilliance when he is in his creative heights,
but then sadly moving when we see the pain that
his disorder caused both for himself and in
those closest to him. The film shows Daniel’s
first experience of unrequited love (which reportedly
inspired hundreds of “songs of pain”),
covers his pivotal period in Austin, TX, where
he makes an impression on the local indie music
scene (while keeping his job as a table-wiper
at McDonald’s), and offers family descriptions
of a disastrous visit home for Thanksgiving
after Daniel had experimented with LSD. Balancing
these events is a fascinating array of talking
heads who knew Daniel, and they explain how
all the while… he was slipping off the
rails. Self-delusion and egomania eventually
become part of the bargain; we hear Daniel in
his own words as he hopes that “the Beatles
would reunite… and then back me up.”
It’s no surprise when even the filmmaking
becomes a bit demented: We see a revealing interview
with the Butthole Surfer frontman, a music acquaintance
of Daniel’s in the 80’s, right as
he is getting his mouth drilled in a dentist’s
chair. Feuerzeig is not afraid to be a little
crazy, too.
In that spirit, The Devil and Daniel Johnston
gives us other startling techniques –-
an erratic hand-held camera representing Daniel’s
POV, a bouncing ball to guide us in the lyrics
of one of his songs, and a striking split screen
effect as we see, near Daniel’s grinning
head, the image of the girl who broke his heart.
As the film brims along, it wonders if deviating
from the “normal” is a necessity
in creative endeavor; at the very least, the
romance of the “crazed” artist (like
Van Gogh, Mozart, Poe, or even Welles), as fruitful
as it has been for centuries, can exhibit a
profound dark side in the here and now. One
of the best interviews is with Austin music
writer Louis Black, who knew Daniel quite well.
The man –- an accomplished critic -- has
lived his whole life with the conviction that
to be great, you have to be a little nuts. But
when Daniel throws himself into a river, Black
has no choice but to call authorities and lock
him away... and his sadness resonates through
the rest of the film.
The Devil and Daniel Johnston continues
on to show Daniel’s “adventures”
in New York City, his brushes with the law,
a significant conflict with a man who tried
to be his agent, the flirtations with suicide
and religious mania, and the climactic story
of an airplane accident. About this latter incident,
Feuerzeig has an intimate interview with Johnston’s
father that, for me, makes the most deeply poignant
observation of all about the misdirected humanity
of Daniel Johnston.
With such staggering material at his disposal,
it’s impossible to describe in words the
colorful and gleefully crazed mosaic of Daniel
Johnston’s work as it is presented in
Feuerzeig’s film. We just have to be thankful
that is there. If you’re interested in
hearing a powerful rendition of “Casper
the Friendly Ghost,” or an off-the-wall
jingle for Mountain Dew (Daniel’s favorite
soda), The Devil and Daniel Johnston
is the film for you. Indeed, as the movie often
intones, Daniel did a lot of great things, and
he did a lot of terrible things. But in terms
of being a “legend” in our popular
parlance, he did everything right, and his life
story is a testament to creative madness even
at its most dangerous.
After seeing Crumb, I was left with
the impression that when it comes to creative
brilliance, it’s likely that we see only
half of what is produced. Museums and cinemas
and performance venues show work that is done
by the souls lucky enough to hold themselves
together, artists who are able to overcome the
interpersonal demands and the social pressures
required to get their creations out into the
world. Daniel Johnston could easily have been
kept in an institution his entire life, and
the output he obsessively produced might have
never been seen or heard. In The Devil and
Daniel Johnston, Jeff Feuerzeig is to be
commended for empathizing with Daniel, and,
above all, for creating a celebration of his
spirit through his art.

Daniel Syrkin
Out of Sight
United States Premiere
Israeli Film Festival
February 23, 2006
Cast: Tali Sharon,
Israel Poliakov, Avigail Harari, Hadas Yaron,
Sandra Sade, Asi Dayan, Klil Horesh, Parhi Dekel,
Michael Aloni, Eitan Glass, Asi Dayan, Klil Horesh,
Parhi Dekel, Michael Aloni, Eitan Glass, Guy Loel,
Yossi Alfi, Alon Pdut, Irit Shilo
Reviewed by Wendy
R. Williams
Out of Sight
is the story of two Israeli cousins, one blind
and one not – one who can’t see and
one who sees too much. The blind Ya’ara
spent much of her childhood in the home of her
cousin and best friend Talia. Ya’ara is
in the United States, working on her doctorate
at Princeton, when she hears that Talia has committed
suicide. Ya’ara returns home to a dark and
depressive place; her family is in mourning.
Ya’ara is
devastated by the loss of Talia, who we see in
colorful flash-backs as a beautiful, vibrant young
girl. Talia had been more than her cousin and
best friend; she was Ya’ara's eyes, interpreting
the world for her. But there was another side
to Talia and to Talia’s family that Ya’ara
now forces herself to see. She reexamines her
memories of her childhood, hunting for clues as
to why Talia would choose to leave the world she
had so seemingly loved.
Out of Sight
is superbly acted and directed. The two actresses
who play the young cousins, Avigayil Harari and
Hadas Yaron, are charming, talented and gorgeous.
Tali Sharon gives a heart-wrenching performance
as the adult Ya’ara. And Sandra Sade gives
a beautifully nuanced performance as Talia’s
bereaved mother.
According to press
notes, the film was made in twenty days and was
Daniel Syrkin’s first film. There are signs
of a new filmmaker (or small budget) in the film;
cell phones ring in the background and sometimes
you can hear a clock ticking that is not part
of the plot. But despite the apparent lack of
funds to hire some guy to yell, "Quiet on
the set or I'll knock you to Haifa," Syrkin
has made an amazing film and would deserves heaps
of praise even if he were a film veteran. The
script (by Noa Greenberg) is very well written;
it will touch many hearts.
Out of Sight is in Hebrew with English
subtitles. It was directed by Daniel Syrkin and
written by Noa Greenberg. The producers were Mirit
Toovi, Yoram Mandel and Ayelet Imberman. The editor
was Boaz Lion; the director of photography was
Giora Bejach. Production design was by Yoav Dahari
and original music was by Rafi Kadishson.

Stephen Woolley’s
Stoned
Opens Friday March 24, 2006
Sex, Drugs
and the Bottom of the Pool
Starring: Will Adamsdale; Ras Barker; Paddy Considine;
Nathalie Cox; Luke de Woolfson: Leo Gregory: Will
Hodgkinson: Eleanor James: Monet Mazur; David
Morrissey; Tuva Novotny; and David Walliams.
Reviewed by Wendy
R. Williams
Stephen Wolley
(the producer of films like Breakfast on Pluto,
The End of the Affair, Michael Collins)
has his directorial debut with Stoned,
a poem about the Sixties. It is both a celebration
of the wildness of the era and a cautionary tale
about the dangers of decadence, too much too soon
and you can’t always get what you want,
etc. etc.
If you were not
yet born in the Sixties, you might not be aware
that that the Sixties only happened in the decade
from 1960-1969 for a privileged few. The great
masses of people did not begin to experience their
personal Sixties revolution until the decade was
almost over.
And Brian Jones
was one of those privileged few. Brian started
the band known as the Rolling Stones, only to
flame out young, drowning in a sea of drugs and
sex. Young, rich, beautiful and talented, he flaunted
a life of sex, drugs and rock-and-roll in a London
that was still recovering from the toils of fighting
World War II and had yet to hear of “flower
power.”
Woolley’s
film is not a story about the Rolling Stones;
he focuses on Brian alone. The story is set in
last few weeks for Brian’s life, a time
when he was about to be ousted from the Stones
(they could not tour with him because of his drug
convictions). Brian has retreated to the country,
where he is living in Cotchford Farm, a home once
owned by A.A. Milne, the author of Winnie the
Pooh. Brian is living with a new girlfriend, Anna
Wohlin (played by Tuva Novotny), and he has hired
a builder, Frank Thorogood (played by Paddy Considine)
to renovate the house. And it is this relationship
between the hedonistic Brian and the working class
Frank that set up the conflict that ends in the
deep end of the pool.
Woolley uses film and film techniques from the
Sixties to give his film a documentary feel. Using
flash backs, he tells the story of Brian’s
life: the founding of the Stones; Brian’s
relationship with Anita Pallenberg; his love of
American black music; his trips to Morocco. Anita
Pallenberg (played by Monet Mazur) has sometimes
been cast as the villain in Brian’s life;
he loved her and she left him for Keith Richards
(Ben Whishaw). Well, if you have heard these rumors,
after seeing this movie you will have a thorough
understanding of what is must have been like to
be a drunken Brian’s punching bag.
Woolley also tells
a bit about the smoothly oiled machine that is
now known as The Stones. Their manager, Tom (played
by David Morrissey) sleazes through the film,
supplying both workmen and girls and cleaning
up the messes afterwards. One particularly compelling
moment is when the Stones come to Cotchford Farm
to tell Brian that he is out. It is a hoot to
watch Mick Jagger (played by Luke de Woolfson)
levitate into the room like the god he has just
become.
But on the night
that Brian died, the firing was in the past and
there were only four people in the house: Brian;
Frank (the builder); Anna (the girlfriend); and
Janet (played by Amelia Warner), a nurse that
Tom (the manager) had hired to keep an eye on
things at Brian’s after he (Tom) discarded
her as his personal bed toy. We see Brian playing
sadistic mind games with Frank, flaunting his
sexuality and questioning Frank's. And there is
sex, drugs, drinking and a midnight dip in the
pool that ends with Brian’s body slowing
sinking to the bottom.
And if you have
been reading this review wondering if there is
nudity, the answer is yes. There is lots of equal
opportunity full-frontal nudity. And if you have
been wondering about the music, the answer is
no; there is no Stones music. Woolley wanted to
tell the story of Brian (who never had a Stones
hit credited to him) so he used the music that
inspired Brian and the music of the times. He
was also probably not able to get the rights to
the Stones's music. But there is a great sound
track, featuring songs like Jefferson Airplanes’
“White Rabbit,” and "Stop Breakin’
Down Blues” by Robert Johnson (one of Brian’s
musical inspirations). The album also features
Boy Dylan's "Ballad of a Thin Man" (covered
by Kula Shaker), a song that is widely suspected
to be about Brian Jones with lyrics such as:
"Because
something is happening here
But you don't know what it is
Do you, Mister Jones?"
Woolley gets good performances from his actors,
especially with Paddy Considine’s portrayal
of Frank Thorogood. Leo Gregory does a good job
with the character of Brian, with perhaps just
a little too much attention to the blankness of
being stoned all the time. The two actresses who
play Brian’s love interests, Monet Mazur
(as Anita Pallenberg) and Tuva Novotny (as Anna
Wohlin) do a good job of portraying one of the
main rewards of being a rock star – the
gorgeous girls who walk into the room saying,
“I’m with the band.” Bravo to
Stephen Woolley on his directorial debut.
|
| |
|