Yair
Hochner’s
Antarctica
Opens November 28, 2008
Reviewed
at The New York Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender
Film Festival by Frank J. Avella in June of 2008
I reviewed
Antarctica in June as part of "Newfest:
The New York Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender
Film Festival." I attended quite a few screenings
and found there to be a refreshing trend in queer
cinema: some actual risk taking--especially with
films like Tom Gustafson’s enchanting Were
the World Mine (now playing in cinemas) and
James Bolton’s devastating Dream Boy
(still without distribution). Yair Hochner’s
Antarctica, though, stood by itself as
not simply good queer cinema, but damn good cinema.
Upon a second and third viewing, I stand by my
initial review (below) and add that the prologue
brilliantly sets up the multi-character-intermingling
structure of the film in an admirably clever way
that I didn’t quite fully realize when I
initially saw it—proving my point that this
particular movie is best served by multiple viewings.
As the year comes to a close, Antarctica remains
one of the best films of 2008.
To be blunt, Yair
Hochner’s Antarctica is one of
the most striking and original films I have seen
in a long time. This masterfully directed gem
commands your attention from the first hyper-sexually-charged
frame to the audacious finale--always challenging
the viewer and never wavering into contrivance
or formula following.
One of the legion
of refreshing things about Antarctica
is that it’s bold, daring and quite unique
in story and character development as well as
filmmaking style. It also effectively manages
the difficult feat of genre-blending. Tagged as
“the first Israeli queer romantic sexy comedy,”
I would have no clue where to place it in the
DVD section of your local store—except in
the ‘Best of 2008’ section!
Hochner probes
the complexities of human emotions and the foibles
of feelings in exciting and honest ways. We become
privy to how our character’s feelings change
and evolve, often in a matter of moments--and
yet sometimes years cannot erase hurt and humiliation.
In Hebrew with
subtitles, Antarctica follows the physical,
spiritual and emotional journeys of a group of
gays and lesbians in the non-stop city of Tel
Aviv. Reminiscent of the work of genius Robert
Altman (Nashville, Short Cuts)
and his protégé’ Paul Thomas
Anderson (Magnolia, Boogie Nights)
as well as Michael Winterbottom (the auteur admits
to being ‘heavily inspired by Wonderland’),
Hochner poetically investigates coincidental convergences
and adds a cosmic twist!
The movie opens
with an unrelentingly graphic (and hot!) multi-screen
visceral and visual assault as it depicts a week
or month in the nocturnal life of Boaz (hunky
Ofer Regirer), clean-cut businessman by day, one
night stand sex-maniac by night, who prides himself
on the line: “You know how many guys I bring
back here?” One hook-up, in particular,
jars him. Danny (Yiftach Mizrahi), a sweet, troubled
teen, stops Boaz mid-petting and asks if they
should talk first, or have coffee. A while later,
Danny shows up at Boaz’ place and asks if
he can stay for a while.
The screen reads
“3 Years Later,” and the mosaic-like
plot kicks into high gear as we meet the wonderful
cast of characters. They include: Omer (Tomer
Ilan), a shy librarian about to celebrate his
thirtieth birthday; Omer’s harried lesbian
sister Shirley (Lucy Dubinchik) and her on-again/off
again girlfriend (Liat Ekta) who owns the local
bar; Omer’s slutty friend Miki (Yuval Raz);
who cyberconnects with smoldering journalist Ronen
(Guy Zo-Aretz) and best-selling author and past-alien-abductee
Matilda Rose (Rivka Neuman), just to name a few!
Via a blind date,
Omer meets Danny, who is living with Ronen who
is carrying on with Miki. Boaz reenters the picture
and wants to reconnect with Danny. And it seems
Omer and Ronen may have a connection of their
own…
I will not give
any more plot away (I’m not certain I could,
anyway!), but I will say that the sequence of
events prove hilarious, heartbreaking, outrageous
and ballsy. Hochner’s terrific script is
matched only by his great abilities as director
and his magnificent cast. The entire ensemble
is to be commended. It is rare that so many talented
actors come together and seamlessly weave into
one great work. There is one curious bit of casting
in the film, but upon much reflection, I can accept
it—with reservation.
Tech credits are
outstanding across the boards, in particular:
Ziv Berkovitch’s gorgeous and mesmerizing
photography and the appropriate original songs
written and performed by Shirly Solomon.
The title is a
metaphor for how much a person, in this frenzied
and lunatic day and age, will allow themselves
to love; to thaw their own carefully acquired
chilliness and simply leave themselves open to
it—especially when it also means leaving
themselves open to the worst kind of pain. Sex
can be a beguiling distraction. It can also turn
into a consuming compulsion. Hochner never judges
his characters, nor does he manipulate them. He
respects them and follows them around for an all-too-brief
while.
I certainly hope
audiences will not let the fact that this is a
foreign film stop them from experiencing such
sensational cinema. I have a grand idea: why not
use the subtitles as an excuse to see the film
a second time!

Wong Kar Wai's
Ashes Of Time Redux
Opens October 10, 2008
Written
By: Wong Kar Wai adapted from Louis Cha's novel
The Eagle-Shooting Heroes
Starring: Jackie Cheung; Leslie Cheung; Maggie
Cheung; Carina Lau; Tony Leung Chiu Wai; Tony
Leung Ka Fai; Brigitte Lin; and Charlie Yeong
Sony Pictures
Classics
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B-
Happiness is a
bad memory, they say: for example, if only I can
block out the recent 777-point drop in the Dow
Industrial Average! Wong Kar Wai's Ashes of
Time Redux, re-imagining of his original
martial arts drama, is based on the adage about
memory, as misery plagues at least one fellow
whose memory of a lost love is deadly. Ashes
is a picture better noted for style than substance:
meaning that legendary Christopher Doyle's cinematography
already looks like a nominee for end-year awards.
Or maybe it's more accurate and complimentary
to say that style IS substance. The plot line,
adapted freely from a story by Louis Cha, is nothing
to write home about, whether you're scribbling
from a seemingly endless strip of China's desert
land or from your seat in the cineplex. The best
that can be said from my own seat, however is
that a) the film is easier to respect than enjoy;
and b) Wong's artfully drawn story is targeted
to those in the audience who have a fondness for
classy martial arts films.
Characters are
difficult to follow despite the fact that Ashes
is theatrical. Doyle's camera is given to extreme
close-ups especially of actors' profiles and the
simple mise-en-scenes which involve usually only
two people at a time—with some time taken
out for groups of bandidos who you'd expect to
be defeated by one or two expert swordsmen.
China looks ahead
as the world's fastest-growing economy, even sending
an astronaut into space, but is known as well
to gaze backwards in its long fondness for martial
arts tales—as far back as the Ming dynasty
of the 14th century. In this martial arts yarn,
which celebrates the world of the Wuxia, or martial
arts warriors, five seasons are portrayed, the
leading thread being Ouyang's (Leslie Cheung)
morbid cynicism following the loss of his main
squeeze to his brother. Huang Yaoshi (Tony Leung
Ka Fai) takes the film's first dramatic step by
drinking a magical wine that makes the bearer
lose his memory. While loss of memory is supposed
to lead to happiness, this is not always true
as he missed an appointment with the woman of
his dreams, Murang (Brigitte Lin). Also of note
is that the increasingly sight-challenged swordsman
(Tony Leung Chiu-Wai) has stopped wandering, while
Hong Qi (Jackie Cheung) seeks to make his own
mark in that career.
But synopsis takes
us only so far, as Ashes appears to have
a story line to serve principally as rationale
for the bold cinematography of Christopher Doyle
(Temptress Moon, Psycho [1998],
Paranoid Park) and to a lesser extent
the choreography of Sammo Hung—who shows
his stuff in a couple of swordfights which are—to
me—of lesser impact in that the action has
the same blurry editing that we find in conventional
action-adventure pics.
Ashes
is as cynical as Ouyang's in its portrayal of
love as the quality most sought after not only
in our own century but in China's 14th yet the
most difficult to achieve. As a story, to sum
up, Ashes is less than involving, its
true resonance taking hold in stylistic delineation.
Rated R. 93 minutes.
© 2008 by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics
Online

Baz Luhrmann’s
Australia
Opens Thursday, November 26, 2008
Written By: Baz
Luhrmann; Stuart Beattie; Ronald Harwood; and
Richard Flanagan
Starring: Hugh Jackman; Nicole Kidman; David Wenham;
Bryan Brown; Jack Thompson; and Brandon Walters
Twentieth Century Fox
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B-
If the producers
of Australia were looking for a title
as generic as the one they picked, they could
have gone with Bigger, Stronger, Faster,
though that one is already taken as the title
of Chris Bell's droll documentary about steroid
use among athletes. Australia is a bigger
film than most, clocking in at two and three-quarters
hours. It's stronger, when you consider the rough
neighborhoods in which the story takes place,
with real men punching, spearing, and shooting
one another as though they were living in Dodge
City or…. Brooklyn. As for faster, there
is a long scene that eavesdrops on a crew of half
a dozen men, leading 1,500 cattle across a Never,
Never land, heading from ranches out in the middle
of nowhere to a beef-processing plant in Darwin
Downunder.
If this picture
is not awards-nominated for Mandy Walker's photography,
the Academy and the guilds whose awards precede
the Oscars, must employ voting as fixed as the
epilogue to America's 2000 Presidential election.
Other than cinematography, however, Australia-born
Baz Luhrmann—whose Strictly Ballroom,
Romeo and Juliet and Moulin Rouge
have been called the Red Curtain trilogy because
of the director's experimental style—is
a conventional family-pleaser. Take that as a
positive or otherwise, depending on what you think
of epic style and/or comfortably predictable fare.
Luhrmann, who had intended to knock out a historical
trilogy, beginning with the later-dropped Alexander
the Great, makes good in part on his goal
with this film.
Australia,
the film, might appear to residents of the Downunder
the way we here in the U.S. think of Oklahoma,
but without the songs. Or it might be considered
by film buffs to be a mimicking the style of Gone
With the Wind. The picture is an epic; Luhrmann,
along with four other writers, makes political
points on a broad canvas. He also aptly highlights
the performances of three amazing actors: Sydney-born
Hugh Jackman; Honolulu-born Nicole Kidman (the
daughter of Australian parents); and thirteen-year-old
glorious find Brandon Walters, the fella who gives
Kidman's character a motive for living fully.
The movie, which
set the studio back $130 million, is as much a
product placement for the Australia Tourism Board
as it is a story of empire-building—both
of local ranchers and of a foreign power. During
the extended time of the piece, we learn that
inhabitants in the year 1939 may be a microcosm
of people found today in Alaska, though if you
look through the window in Darwin, you are not
likely to learn anything about foreign affairs
since the nearest major country is a thousand
miles away.
Filmed in Queensland
and New South Wales, Australia tells
the story of Lady Sarah Ashley (Nicole Kidman),
a fashionably-dressed woman of means who did not
know how unhappy she was until she found a real
man a long distance from her London home. Hearing
rumors that her husband, a rancher in Northwestern
Australia, is fooling around, she determines to
confront him by traveling via propeller aircraft
to Australia, a land that was seen both as a Mecca
by restless Brits and with trepidation by convicts
who were sent there in the 19th century when the
place was a penal colony. She finds her husband
but he is no longer able to serve as a stud; he
is dead. She then reluctantly hires a drover (someone
who drives a herd), played by Hugh Jackman, to
beat the country's biggest cattle lord, King Carney
(Bryan Brown) in a long distance drive from a
faraway ranch to Darwin. The award for this competition
is an army contract to provide beef for armed
forces preparing to go to war with Japan.
The drover, who
lives among the Aborigines speaking their language,
is as much an outsider to polite society in his
land as Lady Ashley is to Australia. Among the
folks is a thirteen-year-old half-white, half-Aboriginal
youth, Nullah (Brandon Walters), whose granddad,
known as King George (David Gulpilil), has magical
powers—as does the boy. King Carney's right-hand
man, Neil Fletcher (David Wenham), is unspeakably
villainous, having abandoned a lad he sired. He
(Fletcher) is now plotting against his boss, determined
to rid the land of his principal competitor.
The one break that
Luhrmann makes with conventional filmmaking is
his use of magical realism. The grandfather is
often seen posing with one knee bent, his foot
bonded to his other leg; he turns up mystically
when he is most needed. For his part Nullah, in
the picture's most dramatic shot amid a landscape
that suggests a mini-Grand Canyon, stops a thundering
herd of 1,500 heads of cattle from falling mortally
over the cliff.
The romance between
the drover and Lady Ashley convinces, as Luhrmann
shows the couple initially hostile given their
radically different upbringings; their time together
in a country, whose culture is the opposite of
London's, leads to passion. Lady Ashley's transformation
from a society woman to a free spirit is encouraged
at least as much by the presence of Nullah, a
boy who is charming and whom she would like to
adopt in that she is unable to have children of
her own. The outbreak of war provides the excitement
that can unite not only a people at large but
also individual couples. Japanese aircraft bomb
Darwin, even landing forces on Australian soil—the
action suggesting segments of Michael Bay's Pearl
Harbor. (Production notes inform us that
the Japanese dropped twice the number of bombs
on Darwin that they used on Hawaii's naval base.)
Effective as Jackman and Kidman are, major kudos
go to non-professional actor Brandon Walters,
an adorable Aboriginal allegedly chosen for the
role after the studio interviewed one thousand
boys. As Nullah he is torn between two cultures,
that of the whites represented by the drover,
and that of his ethnic roots as symbolized by
granddad—who wants to take the boy on the
traditional walkabout (nomadic excursions into
the bush).
Positives, then,
include the ravishing cinematography and strong
performances by the three leads. On the other
hand the picture is overlong, too conventional,
with an outcome predictable even with an hour
to go.
Rated PG-13.
165 minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

Steve Kroschel's
The Beautiful Truth
Opens November 14, 2008
Written By: Steve Kroschel
Starring:: Dr. Stephen Barrett; Dr. Russell Blaylock;
Dr. Dean Edell; Dr. Roger Eichmann; Dr. Hal Huggins;
Dr. David Kennedy; Dr. John Olney; Dr. Wallace
Sampson; Jay Kordich; Garrett Krosche; and Steve
Kroschel.
Cinema Libre Studio/ Kroschel Films
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B+
A battle between
two opposing groups has been in progress before
the Iraq-Afghanistan War, the Vietnam debacle,
the Korean "police action," World War
II, and perhaps even as far back as Hippocrates'
Greece before the Punic Wars. That is the conflict
between regular medicine and alternate methods
of treating illness. The most reasonable people
in the medical establishment will freely recommend
that patients try alternate cures, whether they
be fasting, juicing, meditating, acupuncture,
chiropractic, hypnotism, Rolfing, and others.
The most reasonable people in the alternate community
will not be averse to recommending M.D.'s when
the situations call for standard medicine. The
principal arguments are these: some doctors say
that practitioners of alternate medicine are quacks;
the non-traditional practitioners will point to
the huge profits to be made by the pharmaceutical
industry, big agriculture like Conagra and Monsanto,
and those white-coated folks with stethoscopes
for neckties.
So where does Steve
Kroschel, who wrote and directed The Beautiful
Truth, stand on all of this? The film, which
will be released in New York on November 14th,
shows that he is no extremist. Still he has his
problems with the medical-pharmaceutical-agricultural
people, pointing out that they have maliciously
suppressed evidence that cancer is curable without,
or in combination with, a method that was discovered
over sixty years ago and whose principles can
be found in a book available at Amazon.com and
in better book stores called The Gerson Therapy.
Since nobody reads
nowadays, we're fortunate in having the film released
by Cinema Libre through which we can painlessly
get information about this alleged miracle cure,
not only for cancer but for migraine headaches,
fibromyalgia, and other degenerative diseases.
Photographed by William Bacon III, who does not
hesitate to open up the discussion with visits
to farms and hospitals, even heading up to Haines,
Alaska and over the border to an institution in
Tijuana, The Beautiful Truth, which has
an unfortunately generic title, is pretty convincing.
Writer-director
Kroschel met the family of the controversial Dr.
Gerson, spoke with hundreds of people about the
system, and encountered the resistance of established
medicine which he believes is simply out for profit
while at the same time believing that its standard
treatments are the best bet for seriously ill
people. His principal character is his own teen
son, an inquisitive, mature lad named Garrett.
Garrett is not the sort of kid who'd vote for
the McCain-Palin ticket even though Ms Palin is
from his home state. His favorite book from decades
back would probably have been Charles Reich's
The Greening of America, which for all
we know may re-appear on best-seller lists during
our environmentally threatened time.
Here are some of
the highlights of the film, a work which does
not high-pressure anyone into adopting the protocols
of Max Gerson, a man who suffered from migraine
headaches during his years of medical education
(who can blame him?) and was told what doctors
today tell frustrated patients: "learn to
live with them." He freed himself from migraines
by developing a nutritional system, a vegetarian
salt-free diet. In other words he turned vegan,
a lifestyle indulged in perhaps by one-half of
one percent of Americans.
One: A clinical
trial of 450 advanced skin TB cases were treated
with the Gerson diet, resulting in 446 complete
recoveries, or so Gerson says. Gerson then found
that bone, lung, kidney and other forms of TB
responded to the migraine diet, and as for allergies,
high blood pressure, kidney problems and cancer,
well…bring 'em on!
Two: If you have
mercury amalgam films, get a dentist to pull 'em
out and replace them with mercury-free materials.
Some dramatic film shows how mercury seeps out
of a single amalgam, and keeps seeping and seeping
and seeping. It's a wonder that little Joey ever
made it to the age of eight with those cavities
filled by an ordinary dentist.
Three: Eat organics.
More dramatic celluloid showed how a plain-ol'
regular apple has an aura, a field of energy around
it, but an organic apple had a bigger aura. Sounds
like something from The Twilight Zone or Scientology,
but the people who set up the experiment don't
seem to have anything in common with the Mahareshi
Mahesh Yogi.
Four: Big corporations,
big scammers. Boo! Down with Monsanto and Conagra,
the Mayo Clinic and Big Pharma. They want your
money, but their treatments and products will
not cure you of serious illnesses, while the Gerson
Diet just might.
Five: Don't eat
chips or soy sauce. They have MSG. One wonder
how so many Chinese lived to eighty-five.
Writer-director
Krosche,l who is also, according to press notes
an avalanche expert, wildlife expert and twenty-year
vet of filming natural history, uses his son Garrett
well. What I, a high-school teacher for 32 years,
would have given to have a room full of Garretts
in each class!
The film does not
convince me that my own headaches will be cured
by extracting the juice from a stalk of celery,
but what the heck, I'll try it. The film made
me do it.
Not Rated. 93 minutes.
© 2008 by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics
Online

Ellen Kuras and Thavisouk Phrasavath's
The Betrayal
Opens November 7, 2008
Written
By: Ellen Kuras and Thavisouk Phrasavath
Starring: : Thavisouk Phrasavath
Cinema Guild
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B+
On the very day
of a critics' screening for The Betrayal,
newspapers were filled with big-headline stories
of complaints by Syria and Iran against the U.S.
and coalition forces in the Middle East. Apparently,
U.S. helicopters strayed across the Iraq-Syria
border chasing the bad guys to kill a few people
on Syrian territory, not unlike a similar boo-boo
over Pakistan the other week. Secret flights,
or at least combat missions kept secret by the
CIA and other U.S. agencies, are nothing new for
this country. During the Vietnam War, which ended
in 1975, the U.S. not only invaded Cambodia, while
Nixon kept us ordinary people in the dark, but
dropped more bombs on Laos than were dropped by
us in all of World War I and World War II. And
remember that Laos is a tiny country, and what's
more, the U.S. was not even at war with the Laotians!
All the action was justified—at least when
the secret came out—by the fact that North
Vietnamese army units had penetrated that unhappy
kingdom. To top it all off, notwithstanding all
the firepower, the communist Pathet Lao took over
the government anyway. Though the communists still
control business there, the U.S. entered into
full trade relations in 2005. So what was the
fuss all about?
With The Betrayal,
is directed in her freshman outing by Ellen Kuras
(known more for being behind the camera in productions
including Coffee and Cigarettes, Be
Kind Rewind, and Eternal Sunshine of
the Spotless Mind), with a documentary script
she wrote with principal subject Thavisouk Phrasavath
(who gets a co-directing credit). The film looks
at the personal struggle of one Laotian family.
There are several betrayals pointed out by Kuras
and "Thavi":(A) the U.S. withdrew from
Laos leaving the Laotian people at the mercy of
the communists; (B) though the United States government
gave political asylum to one family that gave
important information to the U.S. for air strikes,
the family was squeezed into two rooms to house
eighteen people; (C) the family patriarch chose
not to rejoin his wife in the U.S. and in fact
married another woman. Whew!
What happened to
the patriarch of the Phrasavath family does remind
us of the fate that befell Senator John McCain,
who spent five years in the Hanoi Hilton. The
man of the family, having supplied information
to the U.S. bombers about the locations of North
Vietnamese troops was arrested after the communist
Pathet Lao took the reins of government and was
sent to a so-called re-education camp for twelve
years of hard labor. Meanwhile his wife and eight
of her ten children escaped from Laos to neighboring
Thailand, a firm U.S. ally, stayed for a while
in a refugee camp, were granted political asylum
in the U.S. and sent to a tenement house on Brooklyn's
Flatbush Avenue—the scene of gang wars,
with gang members telling the "Chinese"
Laotians to go home. The film is narrated principally
by young Thavisouk Phrasavath, who now speaks
fluent English, and his mother, who apparently
knows not a word of Shakespeare's idiom.
The film took twenty-three
years to make, the kind of patience that all of
us holding Wall Street investments could use today.
Instead of focusing on talking heads sitting in
chairs and rambling, she includes considerable
archival film from the chaotic times in Laos,
a look at the mean streets of Brooklyn, decidedly
not paved with gold, and at the long-haired Thavi
who, with his brothers, got some culture shock
when he was warned by police not to look for dinner
by fishing in Brooklyn's Prospect Park. The family
got welfare and food stamps but never lost their
homesickness. We are not privy to what the folks
did for a living in Brooklyn, raising enough funds
to relocate to the wilds of New Jersey.
As Kuras's pictures
travel to the past in Laos, which looks like the
sort of place (after the war) that would encourage
meditation by monks in ochre robes, we wonder
how much it must have pained Ms. Kuras to edit
down twenty-three years of film to ninety-six
minutes, but what she gives us is an treasure-trove
of celluloid.
Not Rated.
96 minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

Fernando Meirelles’
Blindness
Opens October 3, 2008
Written
By: Don McKellar, based on Jose Saramago's novel
Starring: Julianne Moore; Mark Ruffalo; Alice
Braga; Yusuke Iseya; Yoshino Kimura; Don McKellar;
Maury Chaykin; Mitchell Nye; Danny Glover; Gael
Garcia Gernal.
Miramax Films
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: C+
Disasters are a natural
for the big screen: Earthquakes, fire, nuclear
holocausts, tornadoes, dragon-like creatures and
spiders—all the elements found in nature
that try their darndest to upset us human beings.
What makes a good piece of disaster fiction, as
opposed to a documentary that might have come
from the Discovery Channel or Nature Magazine,
is a look at how we cope with these formidable
traumas. Do we take them in stride, cooperate
with one another in a joint effort to conquer
nature's malignant forces, or do we fight one
another, an occurrence that would make our natural
enemies grin with contempt if they were human?
Fernando Meirelles,
who knows quite a bit of the constant battle of
people against people (City of God looks
at the evil shenanigans of children of Rio's slums)
now gives us Blindness, which deals with
how we cope when we lack vision—both literally
and figuratively. In that area he was preceded
by the likes of William Golding's novel, often
required reading in high school, Lord of the
Flies, a tale of English schoolboys victimized
by a plane wreck, let loose on a deserted island
without the presence of a single adult. Children
hunt children as order deteriorates. OK, these
are kids; adults would never turn savage would
they? But how about John Wyndham's The Day
of the Triffids, in which the whole world
is struck blind suddenly and simultaneously? Individualism,
so prized in our own country, becomes a death
sentence in Wyndham's vision.
In his film Blindness,
Meirelles joins the crew of writers and directors
who look into the thin veneer of civilization,
a patina that melts away under extreme stress.
Without citing the Spanish proverb, "En el
pais de los ciegos el tuerto es rey" ("In
the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king"),
Don McKellar, who adapted Nobel-prize-winning
author Jose Saramago's novel to the screen, shows
us that when an entire city has gone blind for
no explicable reason, new communities will be
set up to deal with the crisis. Unfortunately,
one person or one group will grasp power because
of some edge. The most logical leader of a small
community of newly-blinded people would be a doctor's
wife (Julianne Moore).
For reasons unknown,
she is the only individual with continued eyesight.
Yet a blind man (Gael Garcia Bernal) assumes authority
over the distribution of food in Ward Three (where
the film is set). Rather than dish the portions
out equitably as he was expected to do, he becomesn
corrupted, insisting that only after the women
in the wards submitted to the sexual advances
of the men would nourishment be apportioned.
Predictably enough,
the little society crumbles because of its "lack
of vision." Blindness, an worthy
allegory which could have used more of a solid
story—like Jonathan Swift's Gullivar's
Travels, for example, a spoof of the British
monarchy with a fascinating story that can be
appreciated on its own narrative level—falls
short. While the characters are not given names
in the movie or the novel, the better to sound
like expressionist works such as Elmer Rice's
play The Adding Machine, matters work
their way in a predictable fashion.
Mark Ruffalo does
good work as an ophthalmologist married to the
Julianne Moore character, but on the whole the
film lacks emotional connection with the audience
while merely providing a heady experience.
Rated R. 119 minutes.
© 2008 by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics
Online

Mark Herman's
The Boy in the Striped Pajamas
Opens November 7, 2008
Written By: Mark
Herman, from John Boyne's novel for young adults
Starring: Asa Butterfield; Jack Scanlon; Amber
Beattie; David Thewlis; Vera Farmiga; Rupert Friend;
and David Heyman
Miramax Films
Reviewed by Frank J. Avella
Can there be any fresh approach taken when telling
a Holocaust story?
Novelist John Boyne certainly did his best with
the fictional work The Boy in the Striped
Pajamas, which has been adapted into an extraordinary
motion picture that will charm and devastate the
viewer.
I have not read
the novel so my feelings about the work is based
solely on the screen treatment, which I found
to be refreshing in it’s fable approach
and impressively ballsy in the way writer/director
Mark Herman treats the ending, which will stay
with you long after you exit the theatre.
The simple plot
revolves around eight-year old Bruno, the son
of a Nazi officer who lives a pretty cushy and
sheltered life in Berlin. His father receives
a promotion and the family must move to a deserted
area near a concentration camp, which his father
is in charge of operating. A bored Bruno wanders
over to the camp and encounters a young Jewish
boy from behind the electrified fence. I will
stop here because part of the joy and anguish
the viewer will feel is in watching the story
unfold as a conflicted Bruno examines his life
and family in a much different way than before.
The Boy in
the Striped Pajamas is already a very divisive
film; one either buys into the fable-turned-nightmare
aspect of the film where life is seen completely
through Bruno’s eyes, or one does not. New
York Times sage Manohla Dargis has condemned the
work, proving once again that unless it’s
a messy experimental bore (she just adored the
horror that was Last Days), for her,
it has no place on the screen.
But if you allow
yourself to enter the world being created by Herman
and his astute cast, you will be amazed by the
power the film has and rewards it provides; chief
among them is a raw and honest central performance
by Asa Butterfield as young Bruno. In addition,
Jack Scanlon proves potent as Shmuel and Vera
Farmiga devastates as Bruno’s anguished
mother.
The Boy
in the Striped Pajamas is about one boy’s
awakening to the evils around him; it’s
about destroyed innocence. The film demonstrates,
in a clear and concise way, what happens when
people give in to horrifically misguided notions
of superiority and hatred. These may be simple
and obvious themes, but they’re damned important
ones.

Mark Herman's
The Boy in the Striped Pajamas
Opens November 7, 2008
Written By: Mark
Herman, from John Boyne's novel for young adults
Starring: Asa Butterfield; Jack Scanlon; Amber
Beattie; David Thewlis; Vera Farmiga; Rupert Friend;
and David Heyman
Miramax Films
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B+
One of the egregious
lies being passed around during the 2008 American
presidential campaign is that Barack Obama wants
to teach sex education in kindergarten. While
the thought is laughable, we wonder what is the
appropriate teachable moment for other sensitive
aspects of life. For example, when can the Holocaust
be taught, particularly since the very young are
likely to get nightmares of the last century's
most deplorable crime is discussed? John Boyne,
whose fictional work The Boy in the Striped
Pajamas, adapted for the screen by writer-director
Mark Herman, has a way out of this dilemma. Before
a nine-year-old would be ready for the most horrific
facts, the novelist created an allegorical treatment
with thinly-veiled names for the actual events:
"Fury" instead of "Fuehrer,"
for example.
But the film version
adapted by director Mark Herman, is more realistic
and heartbreaking. Nazi salutes are prominent,
swastika flags abound. Our principal attention
is directed to the eight-year-old as in the book,
a lovely young boy named Bruno, who is played
by Asa Butterfield—who allegedly got the
role after hundreds of potential stars were interviewed.
We come away from the film with its ironically
melodramatic ending, easily believing in the principal
parts of the drama, though we must suspend disbelief
when we see Bruno's Jewish friend Shmeul (Jack
Scanlon) spending his days at the barbed wire
fence chatting, playing checkers, and eating food
smuggled to him by Bruno. We know that historically,
children and the elderly did not survive long
in the camps, often gassed within hours of their
arrival—Roberto Benigni's Life is Beautiful
notwithstanding.
The story has its
gripping moments, the plot furthered by crackerjack
acting by a largely British cast, filmed by a
crew of Hungarians in Budapest, its suburbs, and
a set that is said to compete with the splendor
of Prague. When Nazi officer (David Thewlis) is
promoted, he is moved with his family consisting
of his wife (Vera Farmiga), his son Bruno (Asa
Butterfield), and his 12-year-old daughter, Gretel
(Amber Beattie). Though the father has become
the commandant of a concentration camp a mile
away from the family's countryside quarters, his
wife and children are clueless, thinking at best
that it's a work camp where residents are given
an assortment of fulfilling activities (as shown
in a propaganda film that was captured after the
war). Gretel is a true believer in her country's
ideology, even entertaining a crush on a Nazi
lieutenant (Rupert Friend). Bruno becomes curious
when he watches an inmate servant, Pavel (David
Hayman) peel potatoes in his "pajamas."
Sneaking up to the outskirts of the camp, Bruno
discovers a depressed boy his own age and, having
no friends of his own, Bruno strikes up an unlikely
affiliation with the lad—later sneaking
sandwiches to him and even playing checkers across
the barbed wire. When Bruno's dad is again ordered
to move to a new location, the film turns melodramatic,
credibly so, speeding its way to an ironic conclusion.
The Boy in
the Striped Pajamas is a striking entry into
the subgenre of Holocaust films, bearing the originality
of a friendship between two boys literally on
opposite sides of a fence. Asa Butterfield, just
ten at the time of the filming, has the expressiveness
made famous by the wide-eyed, naïve Oskar
(David Bennent) in Volker Schlondorff's The
Tin Drum. The Boy in the Striped Pajamas
would make an idea pair with "The Diary of
Anne Frank."
As an example of
the reading level of Boynton's children's novel,
take a look at an example below of part of the
first chapter.
"You'll have
to say goodbye to your friends for the time being,'
said Mother. 'Although I'm sure you'll see them
again in time. And don't interrupt your mother
when she's talking, please,' she added, for although
this was strange and unpleasant news, there was
certainly no need for Bruno to break the rules
of politeness which he had been taught.
"'Say goodbye
to them?' he asked, staring at her in surprise.
'Say goodbye to them?' he repeated, spluttering
out the words as if his mouth was full of biscuits
that he'd munched into tiny pieces but not actually
swallowed yet. 'Say goodbye to Karl and Daniel
and Martin?' he continued, his voice coming dangerously
close to shouting, which was not allowed indoors.
'But they're my three best friends for life!
"'Oh, you'll
make other friends,' said Mother, waving her hand
in the air dismissively, as if the making of a
boy's three best friends for life was an easy
thing.
"But we had
plans," he protested.
Rated PG--13. 96
minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

Mathieu Amalric and Catherine
Deneuve in A Christmas Tale
Arnaud Desplechin's
A Christmas Tale (Un Conte de Noel)
Opens Friday,November 14, 2008
Written By: Arnaud Desplechin,
Emmanuel Bourdieu, inspired by Jacques Ascher
and Jean-Pierre Jouet's book La greffe
Starring: Catherine Deneuve; Jean-Paul Roussilon;
Anne Consigny; Mathieu Amalric; Melvil Poupaud;
and Hippolyte Girardot.
IFC Films
Reviewed forNew York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B
We've come a way
since all families emulated Leave It To Beaver,
but that's one thing you can't blame on the Republican
administrations. Family dysfunction is a far more
interesting subject for theater and cinema than
happy-contented people who remain in love for
a lifetime. Nor can we say that there's something
in the American Way of Life that causes families
to crumble. Look at Arnaud Desplechin's new movie
A Christmas Tale, for example. Desplechin,
the 48-year-old regisseur known in the U.S principally
for Comment je me suis dispute…(Ma vie
sexuelle), about one Paul Dedalus who is
at a crossroads in his life, needing to make several
decisions; should he complete his doctorate, does
he want to become a full professor, does he really
love his long-standing girlfriend, or should he
re-start with one of his other lovers? If that
sounds like a high-class soap opera, the same
could be said for the Desplechin's current work,
known by the French title Un conte de Noel,
though Noel is heads taller than the
best soap since melodrama is kept to a minimum
and used only when applicable. Desplechin is also
favored with a stellar cast of performers and
some well-chosen dialogue that in one point soars
into poetry.
Watching a picture
like this one may convince some twenty-year-olds
not to get married or, maybe to tie the knot but
buy a dog instead of having kids. Dogs love their
owners (not Michael Vick, but that's another story).
The love of children and spouses is an iffy thing,
even if the young ones are brought up according
to Spock. It's no wonder that Christmas holidays
are anticipated with mixed emotions once you're
beyond the age of twelve. Blood is blood, but
having neither having similar chromosomes nor
choosing your ideal mate guarantees a lifetime
of bliss.
A Christmas
Tale, like others of the family dysfunction
subgenre, brings together people of the same immediate
family leading lives of their own outside the
patriarchal harem, choosing mates that may or
may not get along with the in-laws. The film is
overlong at two and one-half hours, but is of
special interest in that each of the characters
is developed at least to some extent. Contrary
to the way some in the family treat others, Desplechin,
using Emmanuel Bourdieu's clever script inspired
by Jacques Ascher and Jean-Pierre Jouet's book
La greffe, has us ultimately sympathizing
with even the most scurrilous of the breed. Redemption
is at hand.
The action takes
place (coincidentally?) in the town of the director's
birth, Roubaix, France—just outside the
city of Lille which has the nearest hospital.
The queen bee of the tribe, Junon Vuillard (Catherine
Deneuve), has been diagnosed with terminal leukemia,
a disease that she may have passed on to one of
her offspring, who died at the age of seven. Hoping
to save the lad, though, Junon and her husband
Abel (Jean-Paul Roussilon) gave birth to a few
more, hoping that one of them can prove able to
donate bone marrow. Of the children, Elizabeth
(Anne Consigny) is a playwright who confesses
to her dad that she always feels sad; her husband
(Hippolyte Girardot), a mathematician, delights
the theater audience by calculating with the use
of sigma signs on a chalkboard how many more months
Junon will live with a transplant or without;
Ivan (Melvil Poupaud), Junon's favorite, has two
small sons; and most interesting of all, Henri
(Mathieu Amalric, who opens as 007's nemesis on
the day that this film makes its U.S. debut),
has been banished from the family in a deal ironed
out by his sister—who has reason to loath
him. Henri's outbursts provide the melodramatic
moments and comic relief.
The film can best
be called a serio-comedy, complete with scenes
taken from the bone marrow surgery (ouch) and
a look under the microscope of blood cells that
allow the hematologist to determine who is a potential
donor. Desplechin gives each principal character
his or her own story in a separate chapter, then
seamlessly merges the shorts into the whole. Well
acted by the entire ensemble, A Christmas
Tale is given a delightful musical accompaniment
particularly by Mendelssohn's "A Midsummer
Night's Dream" while even one or two American
pop songs are heard on the track.
Not Rated. 150
minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

Isabel Coixet's
Elegy
Opens Friday, August 8, 2008
Written By: Nicholas Meyer,
from Philip Roth's novella "The Dying Animal"
Cast: Ben Kingsley, Penelope Cruz, Dennis Hopper,
Patricia Clarkson, Deborah Harry, Peter Sarsgaard
Samuel Goldwyn
Films
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: A-8
In his four-stanza
poem, Sailing to Byzantium—which
includes a verse to "a dying animal,"
also the title of a recent novella by Philip Roth—William
Butler Yeats describes both about the journey
taken by the speaker's soul around the time of
death and the process by which the artist transcends
his own mortality. Philip Roth, whose novella
forms the basis of film Elegy, is obsessed
with age, with mortality, and with the fading
of his own passions—all of which come across
in this remarkable movie by the Spanish director,
Isabel Coixet. Without passing judgment on a man
who might be roundly condemned by feminists today,
Coixet directs from a screenplay by Nicholas Meyer,
one which closely follows the trajectory of Roth's
book. Prestige films from literary sources are
a rare breed today: Elegy joins such
summer-released films as Julian Jarrold's Brideshead
Revisited as must-sees on any sophisticated
moviegoer's itinerary.
"That is no
country for old men…An aged man is but a
paltry thing,/ A tattered coat upon a stick, unless/
Soul clap its hands and sing…" So goes
some verses from Yeats's poem, and so evolves
the character David Kepesh (Ben Kingsley), a charismatic
professor of literary criticism who uses his prestige
at a New York university (one that looks like
Columbia though the filming took place in Vancouver)
to bed several women three or four decades his
junior. He keeps his distance emotionally from
the women—something his best friend, squash
partner and Pulitzer-prize-winning poet George
(Dennis Hopper) urges him to do. Kepesh is floored
by the beauty of a Cuban-born student, Consuela
Castillo (Penelope Cruz); he senses that she must
be wooed before being won just like women in the
1950's, he correctly notes in discussing America's
Puritan heritage on the air. Kepesh is fascinated
by her beautiful breasts—which Ms Cruz generously
exhibits for us in the audience—so much
so that contrary to feminist beliefs today, Consuela
lauds him for his attentions therein. "Nobody
else loves my body as you do," she states
with love in her eyes. While Kepesh sets up a
sexual liaison with the young student, he maintains
a long-term, commitment-free affair with an older
woman, Carolyn (Patricia Clarkson), a sophisticated
businesswoman in her late forties who believes
that she is his only bed partner.
Philip Roth's obsession
with age and decline, punctuated by at least one
death in the story, evokes the title Elegy,
a mournful poem or lament for the dead. As an
older man who ponders his age almost daily, he
is certain that a youthful charmer will steal
his great love away. Jealousy demands that she
remain in touch with him regularly. "Stop
worrying about growing old," his friend George
advises, knowing that his counsel will not be
followed, "And think about growing up."
(Lots of us men should have such problems with
immaturity.)
Aside from its
theme of mortality and decline, Elegy
concerns itself with the impact on others of pure
physical beauty. David, by way of illustration,
simply cannot see beyond Consuela's body to understand
that this woman wants a man who can offer her
a future, and that David would be the one she
would choose. David's womanizing has an effect
on his son, Kenny Kepesh (Peter Sarsgaard), a
doctor who cannot forgive his dad's marital abandonment
and therefore remains loyal to his own wife though
he has fallen in love with another. In the film's
final scene, there has been an about face, one
which demonstrates Consuela's spirit to David
for the first time.
Jan Claude Larrieu
photographs the proceedings in Vancouver, which
stands in for New York, heightening director Coixet's
emphasis on the pain that complements the human
condition as well as its physical pleasures. The
music, both in the background and as pieces played
by David on the piano, are the antithesis of summer-movie
soundtracks—featuring works from Bach's
"Adagio from Concerto in D Minor" through
Vivaldi's "Vendro Con Mio Diletto" from
"Giutino" but not ignoring pop favorites
like Al Lerner's "Loneliness Ends with Love."
Acting is magnificent all-around with Dennis Hopper
supplying much of the humor as the principal's
sexual and spiritual adviser, Ben Kingsley's piercing
job particularly in a concluding scene that finds
him awash in tears, and Penelope Cruz's deft portrayal
as a woman of spectacular beauty, charm, and ultimate
vulnerability.
Rated R. 106 minutes.
© 2008 by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics
Online

Damian Harris’
Gardens of the Night
Opens November 7, 2008
Written By: Damian
Harris
Starring: Gillian Jacobs; Evan Ross; Ryan Simpkins;
Jermaine "Scooter" Smith; Tom Arnold;
Kevin Zegers; and John Malkovich
City Lights Pictures
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B
Prostitution below
the legal age may be common in the underdeveloped
world—in nations like Thailand—because
selling one's young body appears the only way
to get by other than by working for a dollar a
day in an Adidas factory. But forced prostitution
of tykes has got to be about the sleaziest crime
one can engage in, one for which even Barack Obama,
considered by Republicans to "the most liberal
guy in the Senate," supports the death penalty.
Such a case is brought to light in Damian Harris's
Gardens of the Night, the title of which
is taken from a poem, the action opening in a
clean, solid middle-class area somewhere on the
East Coast.
For the story, writer-director Harris uses a pair
of actors to play their participation in the crime
at the age of eight, then a separate couple again
at seventeen. His point is that not only is pimping
out a kid horrendous enough, a complete destruction
of their innocence, but a plight in which the
abused kids turn into adults with disassociated
identities—blank looks on their faces, with
no foundation for emotional giving and taking.
In the particular scenario that opens the story,
the audience cannot help blaming the girl's parents
for the abduction since they apparently let their
pretty seven-year-old walk to school and return
home alone, perhaps thinking that nothing untoward
could happen on the clean, probably crime-free
streets that form the path from school to residence.
Gardens of
the Night features some fine acting particularly
by the victim, Leslie, at the age of seven (Ryan
Simpkins), a girl who in being coaxed for her
performance was not told what the story was really
about, but was instead given a spiel about how
she is to be a victim of someone who wants a family
of his own. Ms. Simpkins, a ten-year-old who had
a role in Pride and Glory and is a veteran
of TV episodes of Law and Order, performs
in the role with the kind of innocence that would
allow her character to believe an abductor who
gets her into his car by telling her at first
that her folks were called away, later using the
ploy that her parents no longer want her. Tom
Arnold, already cast as a man who has been raping
his daughter in Marianna Palka's quirky romance
Big Dick, now plays the part of abductor
with such empathy for his victim that we in the
audience can almost think that what he is doing
is not quite as terrible as the media always say.
Of course it is, as we find out by checking out
Leslie at the age of seventeen, already too old
to hold the interest of the child porn crowd.
The story centers
on Leslie, who are the age of seven is pulled
away from her roots by Alex (Tom Arnold) who,
working with an accomplice, Frank (Kevin Zegers),
has carefully planned an elaborate yarn for the
girl. Alex already holds Donnie (Jermaine "Scooter"
Smith), a black kid about Leslie's age, who could
easily escape but is convinced that his mother
has voluntarily given him up to Alex. Leslie protects
herself from the strangeness of the situation
by reading fairy-tales about a forest into which
young people can escape to feel safe. At midpoint,
the action shifts to San Diego nine years later
where the two sell their bodies to passersby.
Leslie (Gillian Jacbos) and Donnie (Evan Ross),
have formed a bond. The now beautiful Leslie is
even recruiting younger girls into the trade,
though she is given another chance for redemption
when she is accepted by Michael (John Malkovich)
into a women's shelter pending her release to
her parents—whom Leslie believes to be dead.
Gardens of
the Night could be called a docudrama, but
is filmed by Paula Huidobro in both the dingy
world of predators and the middle-class suburbs
of Leslie's parents as though it were imaginative
fiction. We come away with an understanding of
what these victims go through in a movie that
answers the question, "Why don't they just
run away or call 911?" What happens to Leslie
and the one person in her sordid life who cares
for her, convinces us that while we may think
these people would love to kill their abductors,
they instead have absorbed their values. Tom Arnold
scores as a bad guy who knows how to play daddy
and who, in fact, may genuinely like his corrupt
parental role.
Rated R.
108 minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

David Koepp's
Ghost Town
Opens Friday September 19, 2008
Written By: David Koepp
and John Kamps
Starring: Ricky Gervais; Tea Leoni; Greg Kinnear;
Billy Campbell; Kristen Wiig; Dana Ivey; and Aasir
Mandvi.
DreamWorks
Grade: B+
Reviewed by Harven Karten for New York Cool
Most of the world's
religions believe some form of life continues
for people after death, whether the reward of
72 virgins is promised or not. In some cases,
though, there are conditions. In ancient Greek
drama and mythology, Antigone gave up her freedom
and her life by burying her dead brother—a
task prohibited by the hostile king who is determined
not to let the man's soul go a final resting place
which can occur only if one is properly buried.
Egyptian nobility believed that you can indeed
take it with you and they were buried with their
servants, pets and household goods.
This idea of an afterlife is prominent in David
Koepp's sentimental comedy, Ghost Town.
In fact much ado is made in the film about an
Egyptian mummy whose cause of death seven thousand
years ago is being researched by a noted Egyptologist.
In this film, New York City is also more overcrowded
than we thought: ghosts roam about with unfinished
business and these ghosts are not so keen on a
Manhattan existence despite their ability to do
without the expense of food, clothing or shelter.
Until unfinished biz is taken care of, they cannot
go to their ultimate reward. But only one living
person is able to see them. He is the only guy
who can settle their affairs and give them closure.
He sees them because he was dead himself (for
seven minutes while undergoing a colonoscopy with
general anesthesia), but was brought back to life
by a staff of doctors who may have had more than
a little practice dealing with an incompetent
anesthetist.
In shaping a comedy
around this concept, Koepp manages to provide
the sort of entertainment that rejects the conventions
of sit-coms. This is not a TV program in which
characters have to crack silly jokes every twenty
seconds, with punch lines appreciated only by
a recorded laugh track. Ghost Town is
able to evoke both smiles and tears from its audience,thanks
to the talents of British comic, Ricky Gervais,
known on our side of the Atlantic from his role
as David Brent in the TV series The Office.
He makes a delightful Everyman, a dentist whose
contact with intimacy is restricted to dealing
with people's mouths—an ideal profession
for someone who doesn't want to listen to or chat
with anyone because he can divert his patients's
attention by jamming molds or cotton in their
mouths. He can also put them to sleep with a hefty
dose of nitrous oxide.
What redeems this
character, Bertram Pincus, is a relationship that
puts a smile on his face—something that
dentists always say they can do for others. A
misogynistic fellow in his mid-forties, Bertram
"dies" while undergoing an otherwise
routine colonoscopy (his "death" is
not being the fault of his sprightly doctor (Kristen
Wiig)). He is brought back to life and is thereafter
able to see a myriad of walking poltergeists,
who are not scary in a Halloween way, but scary
in how they can constantly interfere with the
poor guy's privacy (PRIH visy as he would say).
Bertram's life is turned around by the ghost of
Frank Herlihy (Greg Kinnear), an adulterer who
cannot rest in peace until he can effect a breakup
of his widow Gwen's (Tea Leoni) alliance with
a lawyer whom he (Frank, the dead ex-husband)
says is out for Gwen's money. In return for Frank
agreeing to leave him (mostly) in peace, Bertram
takes on the task of turning Gwen off to the attorney,
but (of course) Bertram falls in love with the
woman himself.
Many critics have
problems with Capra-esque movies, the feel-good
dramas that bring tears of delight to the eyes
of audience members. But, I was charmed throughout—first
by the yuks arising from his colonoscopy preparation,
then by the comic talents of Greg Kinnear as he
convincingly works his wiles on the dentist and
finally by the closure that satisfies not only
Frank, but also satisfies several others ghosts
who have have also told Bertram about their needs,
needs that must also be addressed before they
too can be released to a better place.
Adding to the picture's
captivating quality is that it's filmed in New
York, largely in Central Park. Ghost Town
is a billet-doux to the world's greatest city.
But the world's greatest city is also a place
where a large proportion of the eight million
residents have problems that prevent them from
moving to better times right here on earth. The
sort of pic that usually pops up around Thanksgiving
or Christmas, but it has carved out a nice niche
right now in September.
Rated PG-13. 103
minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

Sally Hawkins in Happy-Go-Lucky
Mike Leigh’s
Happy-Go-Lucky
Opens Friday October 10, 2008
Miramax Films
Reviewed by Wendy R. Williams
Written by Mike
Leigh
Starring: Sally Hawkins; Eddie Marsan; Alexis
Zegerman; Sylvestra Le Touzel; Stanley Townsend;
and Kate O’Flynn.
Mike Leigh (Secrets
& Lies, Vera Drake) has created
another wonderful film world and this time he
has left the world of adoption secrets and illegal
abortions to enter the world of happiness. And
this world of happiness revolves around one unforgettable
character Poppy (played by Sally Hawkins), an
eternally optimistic London grade school teacher.
Here is a quote
from the Happy press release: “In
the effervescent new comedy from director Mike
Leigh (Vera Drake, Secrets &
Lies), Sally Hawkins stars as the unforgettable
Poppy, an irrepressibly free-spirited school teacher
who brings an infectious laugh and an unsinkable
sense of optimism to every situation she encounters
as a single woman in London. When Poppy’s
commuter bike is stolen, she signs up for driving
lessons with Scott (Eddie Marsan), who turns out
to be her polar opposite – a fuming, uptight
cynic who takes himself extremely seriously. As
the tension of their weekly lessons builds, Poppy’s
story takes alternately hilarious and serious
turns -- careening from flamenco classes to first
dates--becoming a touching, truthful and deeply
life-affirming exploration of one of the most
mysterious and often the most elusive of all human
emotions: happiness.”
When we first see
Sally, her bike has been stolen. But this loss
does not get our heroine down, she uses the lack
of a bicycle as an impetus to sign up for driving
lessons. Then she goes home where she makes some
hysterical masks for take to her school. And life
continues to serve up life’s problems to
our heroine. She sees a student bullying another
student and instead of cracking down on the bully,
she investigates to find out what is happening
at the child’s home that is making him so
aggressive. And by doing so, she meets a really
hot social worker. She sees a homeless man under
a railroad overpass and she stops to talk to him,
showing absolutely no fear.
But it is the driving
lessons that really test Sally. Her driving instructor
(played by the excellent Eddie Marsan) is that
kind of man that would make most sane people hire
a new instructor after the first five minutes.
But not our heroine, she optimistically assumes
that she can win him over and perseveres against
all odds. But nothing she does makes a difference
with Scott and in the end, Sally has to give up.
But even having to quit her lesson does not get
her down; she still thinks about what might be
best for Scott.
Mike Leigh has
made a beautiful film. And it is the type of film
that made me want to sit down after I saw it and
talk about happiness. Abraham Lincoln is famously
quoted as saying that, "Most people are about
as happy as they make up their minds to be."
Is being happy a talent like an aptitude for math?
Are we simply born with our capacity to be happy?
There is the age-old question: Why do some people,
who have little reason to rejoice, stay basically
happy anyway and why do others, who seemingly
have every reason to be happy, live their lives
with so little happiness? And why is it so much
fun to watch a character like Poppy simply be
happy?
Sally Hawkins was
the winner of the Best Actress Award at the 2008
Berlin Film Festival for Happy-Go-Lucky.
Happy-Go-Lucky was also an official selection
at the upcoming 2008 Toronto and New York Film
Festivals.

Vadim Glowna's
House of the Sleeping Beauties (Das Haus der
schlafenden Schonen)
Opens Friday November 14, 2008
Written By: Vadim Glowna
from Yasunari Kawabata's novella
Starring: Vadim Glownal; Angela Winkler; Maximilian
Schell; Birol Uriel; Mona Glass; Marina Weis;
Benjamin Cabuk; and Peter Luppa.
First Run Features
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B
Vadim Glowna's film, adapted
from a Japanese story, might remind theater-goers
of Joseph Kesselring's play, Arsenic and Old
Lace, a play about some dotty women who take
in lonely old men as boarders with a plan to put
them out of their misery; they check in, but they
don't check out. An older woman in House of
the Sleeping Beauties takes in lonely old
men for the night, but they do check out--most
of the time. This film is what feminist critics
might call a disgusting male fantasy, but those
who have more of an appreciation of the psychology
of eroticism might appreciate this film even though
it lacks the humor of Kesselring's play. But then
again Arsenic and Old Lace was certainly
devoid of eroticism. So, what do you like: laughs
or sex?—not that they are mutually exclusive
by any means. Das Haus der schlafenden Schoenen
embraces the stereotypical German film style:
heavy, ponderous, and lyrical, with nary a smile
in its 99 minutes.
The Japanese novella
that inspired this film opens with a forty-year-old
woman's warning, "You are not to do anything
in bad taste. You must not put your finger into
her mouth or do anything of that sort."
Madame (Angela Winkler), the woman in Glowna's
film version is in her sixties—close to
the age of the character of Edmond (writer-director
Vadim Glowna).
House of the
Sleeping Beauties is lyrical, the equivalent
in music of a tone poem and in theater parlance
of a chamber piece, albeit one with the frequent
symbol of flocks of birds flying away, as though
departing from this very life. Edmond is in his
late sixties but looks and acts ten years older;
he is out of shape with his perpetual blank expression
and stuffy wardrobe, walking slowly, ponderously
throughout. He is a sad man, lonely and guilt-ridden
since the death of his wife and daughter fifteen
years earlier in a motor accident that Edmond
conjectures was suicide. When Kogi (Maximilian
Schell), his best friend, advises him of a house
in which guests are allowed to sleep next to naked
virgins, Ed's all-ears, with an even added excitement
when he learns that the woman are asleep per Madame's
injections the entire time and upon awakening
would remember nothing of what occurred with the
guests.
The thriller motif
enters when Edmond discovers a corpse being loaded
into a car, but this German celluloid is in no
way like the typical American nail-biter. The
plot meanders slowly forward, evoking audience
curiosity without contributing to an unhealthy
rise in blood pressure—though the sight
of naked female bodies caressed by an old, chain-smoking
lecher might arouse erotic impulses (from most
of us men) or disgust (from feminists).
Glowna, who turns
in a skillful performance as a man wishing for
death, one who cannot even fathom the interest
a non-comatose woman like his secretary (Mona
Glass) has in him, succeeds in creating a piece
that could easily be put on a small stage (absent
the constant flights of birds). This film is for
lovers of the works of Ingmar Bergman, particularly
the Swedish director's film Jungfrukallan
with its meditations on life, death, revenge,
religion and peace.
Not Rated.
99 minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

Philippe
Claudel's
I've Loved You So Long (Il y
a longtemps que je t'aime)
Opens Friday: October 24, 2008
Written By: Philippe Claudel
Starring: Kristin Scott Thomas; Elsa Zylberstein;
Serge Hazanavicius; Laurent Grevill; Frederic
Pierrot; Claire Johnston; Jean-Claude Arnaud
Sony Pictures
Classics
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B
In the press notes,
writer-director Philippe Claudel—who is
a prolific novelist as well as a regisseur—states
that in his film "some people will see the
story of two sisters trying to become close…others
more interested in the theme of incarceration….Some
will focus on the rebirth of a woman, while others
will watch the life of a family confronted with
unspoken, dark secrets." As with many good
novels and films, I've Loved You So Long
has enough complexity to lead audience members
to have multiple interpretations, differences
of opinion as to which theme is primary and which
are corollary. The film, known in its original
French title Il y a longtemps que je t'aime—too
generic to be appropriate to an otherwise solid
work—is also a platform for the enormous
acting talent of Kristin Scott Thomas, whose character,
Juliette, is known to be half English and half
French and who speaks French fluently with a British
accent. Thomas, who delivered a stunning performance
in Anthony Minghella's 1996 pic The English
Patient, shows all the symptoms of a rebirth:
we see her without makeup, in drab clothing, nervously
chain-smoking upon her release from a prison in
or near the Eastern French city of Nancy.
Juliette, convicted
fifteen years previously for the crime of killing
her young son, has destroyed a good part of her
life and that of her sister, Lea (Elsa Zylberstein),
who seems outwardly happy in her marriage to Luc
(Serge Hazanavicius) but who deep down is has
been affected by her sister's crime. She had rarely
visited Juliette in prison but continues to love
her "so long," later becoming instrumental
in helping Juliette shed her silent withdrawal
from life.
Like Chris Eska's
movie August Evening, I've Loved
You Do Long avoids melodrama, though with
two exceptions, one outburst coming from Lea in
the college course she is teaching in which she
accuses Dovstoyevsky, no less, of having no personal
knowledge of a real murderer. Otherwise, director
Claudel takes us through mundane events,visualizing
a ladder for Juliette to climb from her understandable
guilt feelings about her deed to a reconciliation
with Lea and a readiness to become a fully functioning
woman.
Roadblocks are
in Juliette's way. One potential employer throws
her out upon not because she is an ex-con—he
already knows that she was away for fifteen years—but
because of her specific crime. Yet another comes
to her rescue by a willingness to offer her a
three-week trial toward receiving a permanent
contract on a new job, something one doubts would
be likely here in the United States. Lea's husband
Luc is not at all pleased that his wife is allowing
Juliette to settle into their quarters—never
mind that Luc is keeping his own father, speechless
because of a stroke, as a permanent resident.
A guest at a dinner party threatens to expose
Juliette's crime by baiting her about her silence.
Her mother (Claire Johnston) is in a nursing home
with Alzheimer's, pushing her daughter away with
hostile invectives.
On the other hand,
aside from the support of a sister, Juliette receives
the attentions of one of Lea's colleagues at the
college, Michel (Laurent Grevill), a man who has
had his own disappointments years back. Similarly,
Juliette's probation officer, Capitaine Faure
(Frederic Pierrot), takes her under his wing,
a man with his own cross to bear.
While Ms. Zylberstein
does a decent job as the supportive sister, she
is outclassed by Thomas's subtle performance as
a woman who at first looks ready to give up on
life but is nursed to emotional health by the
good people on her side.
Not Rated. 117
minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

Hunter Hill & Perry
Moore’s
Lake City
Opens Friday, November 21, 2008
Starring:
Sissy Spacek; Troy Garity; Rebecca Romijn; Dave
Matthews; Drea de Matteo; Colin Ford; and Keith
Carradine
Reviewed by Frank
J. Avella at the 2008 Tribeca Film Festival
There are two completely
different films being force-cut into one in
Lake City, written and directed by Hunter
Hill and Perry Moore. The first is a deeply affecting
domestic drama about the psychological and spiritual
damage a family tragedy has on a mother and a
son many years after the fact. The second is a
cliché-ridden, badly executed crime thriller
about stolen drugs and one-dimensional bad guys.
The fact that the former is able to eclipse, if
not eradicate, the latter is a tribute to a handful
of sharp and absorbing performances that overcome
the defects of the screenplay and direction.
The basic plot
finds Billy (Troy Garity) on the run with the
son of his drug-addict girlfriend. He is forced
to return home to his mother (Sissy Spacek) and
confront certain demons from the family past.
Spacek, who should
have won her second Oscar a few years back for
her searing turn in In the Bedroom, delivers
a complex raw portrayal of a mother living with
the worst kind of guilt. Her Maggie is an atypical
survivor who manages to continue her life despite
it’s low lows. She’s a ‘steel
magnolia’ born more out of sheer will than
necessity. It’s the type of dynamic work
that could get her that seventh nomination.
As Billy, her troubled
but redeemable son, Garity shows great vulnerability
and screen charisma. In a heartbreaking confrontation
near the end of the film, Spacek and Garity take
us to a very real and disturbing place. (I couldn’t
help but wonder what he and his mother, Jane Fonda,
would have done with the scene or a scene like
it—perhaps one day they will work together
and we will we find out.)
The film could
have used more scenes like the one just mentioned
where the writing and direction had a powerful
restraint.
Rebecca Romijn
impresses as the local law with a deep connection
to Billy. Keith Carradine and David Matthews (yes,
songster Dave Matthews!) provide brief but sterling
support. Drea DeMatteo tears things up in a tiny
but potent cameo. And young Colin Ford does excellent
work as a boy caught up in a lot of adult mess.
And speaking of
mess, the chief problem with Lake City lies
in it’s laughable and unnecessary drug plot,
with a denoument so ridiculous and amateurishly
done it provoked unintentional laughter at the
press screening I attended. I have a hope that
the directors will go back and rethink/recut the
film and reduce the crime crap drastically because
what would remain is a moving and incisive film
about communication, forgiveness and salvation.

Peter Sollett's
Nick and Norah's Infinite
Playlist
Open Friday, October 3,
2008
Written By: Lorene
Scafaria, from Rachel Cohn & David Levithan's
novel
Starring: Michael
Cera; Kat Dennings; Aaron Yoo; Rafi Gavron; Ari
Graynor; Alexis Dziena; Zachary Booth; and Jay
Baruchel
Reviewed
by Bryan Close
Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist is a plodding
comedy that largely wastes two engaging performances
by Michael Cera and Kat Dennings in the title
roles.
Here's the pitch:
Nick, the charmingly dorky bass player in a mostly
gay rock band, is heartbroken after having been
dumped by Tris. He obsessively makes CD mixes,
which he sends her, she throws away, and poor
little rich girl Norah rescues from the garbage,
because…. He makes the best mixes ever!
Nick and Norah meet cute on the Lower East Side
and head out into the night in Nick's beat up
yellow Yugo (Get it? It's a beat up yellow Yugo!)
to find the secret gig of their favorite band,
Where's Fluffy.
Nick gets his
bandmates to take home Norah's sloppy drunk friend
Caroline (the excellent Ari Graynor), whom they
immediately lose. So they all call off the search
for Fluffy, and go looking for Caroline. She shouldn't
be that hard to find – she's got to be somewhere
in Manhattan. Or New Jersey. Or Brooklyn... Meanwhile,
Nick deals with his perfectly horrible ex, Tris
(it is impossible to believe that either of these
two was ever attracted to the other for a second),
and Norah deals with her almost-as-horrible sometimes
ex, Tal, who is using her – she figures
out tonight, after three years – to get
access to her rich and famous record producer
dad.
The movie is essentially
high concept – Some Kind of Wonderful
meets After Hours – dressed up
to look like a soulful indie. (One nice hat tip
to the genre is a no-line cameo by Kevin Corrigan.
There was a rule in the 90s that you couldn't
make an independent film without putting Kevin
Corrigan in it. It was a good rule.)

Peter Sollett's
Nick and Norah's Infinite
Playlist
Open Friday, October 3,
2008
Written By: Lorene
Scafaria, from Rachel Cohn & David Levithan's
novel
Starring: Michael
Cera; Kat Dennings; Aaron Yoo; Rafi Gavron; Ari
Graynor; Alexis Dziena; Zachary Booth; and Jay
Baruchel
Columbia Pictures/ Mandate Pictures
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B
At first sight,
you might conclude that Peter Sollett's Nick
and Norah's Infinite Playlist is strictly
for the high-school crowd, particularly those
who go to prep schools and other private halls
of academe. In my thirty-two years of teaching
in public high schools I never met kids who talked
the way these fellows and gals do—articulate
and mature (well their talk is mature if not always
their actions). In other words the movie seems
directed toward those who like Salinger's The
Catcher in the Rye, but without all the cynicism.
The two principals, the title figures, are fairly
uncomplicated and sweet—there's not much
Holden Caulfield in them. When you consider that
one of them, Norah, has a dad who runs a major
recording studio and is destined to attend Brown
University right after high-school graduation,
you know that they're not students in the Big
Apple's typical, public institutions.
On second sight,
though, director Sollett, using a screenplay by
Lorene Scafaria adapted from Rachel Cohn and David
Levithan's novel of the same name (only $7.99
on Amazon.com),
our own, older memories are being prodded back
to the time we spent one magical night with a
person and during the course of a few hours have
had a potential relationship morph from vague
hostility to outright love. This sounds like something
out of the movie playlist that would include Richard
Linklater's Before Sunset, a film about
two people, Jesse and Celine, who have not seen
each other for nine years, rekindling their relationship
within a single day.
What is unusual
is that none of these high-school seniors take
drugs, only one gets drunk habitually, and the
only vulgar note is struck by the intoxicated
one who barfs into a toilet, then reaches into
the water to pick up the phone and the gum that
she dropped therein. There's not much of a story
in the conventional sense. Instead Nick and
Norah is a loosely scripted tale of how music—rather
than drugs or extended friendship—leads
two people recovering from hurts to feel love,
puppyish or otherwise.
As Nick, the now-becoming-ubiquitous
20-year-old Michael Cera (Superbad) is
a low-key charmer who is not the most successful
Romeo in his school. He is left out of some of
the fun because he is always himself. He does
not put on acts and appears to accept whatever
comes his way with more equanimity than most of
his peers. He is hurting from being dumped by
Tris (Alexis Dziena), a bimbo who fixes her empty
charms back on Nick only because she sees him
with another girl, Norah (Kat Dennings, The
Forty Year Old Virgin). The only way Norah
knows Nick is from the mixes he churns out for
Tris, which the latter regularly dumps into the
trash only to be picked up by Norah. (Note: a
mix is a combination of songs that kids nowadays
put together on CDs with a playlist for each delineating
what's on the disk—sometimes expressing
the feeling that one has for the recipient.)
Nick and Norah
do seem made for each other, as Norah has been
dating a fellow (Jay Baruchel) who merely uses
her to get to her father's influence in the record
industry, while Nick is disappointed in love with
a woman who tries to seduce him only out of jealousy.
During the night in Manhattan, particularly around
St. Marks Place in East Village, the two look
for Norah's unpleasant, drunk friend, Caroline
(Ari Graynor) but more important are determined
to find "Where's Fluffy," a band that
holds the locations of its concerts secret.
The movie has the
ambiance of John Carney's critically applauded
Once, in which a busker and an immigrant
learn to love each other during a week of making
music. As we all know, New York is the world's
most exciting city. Yet Tom Richmond's photography
around midtown and even in the scruffy East Village
makes the Apple look like Paris-on-the-Hudson.
The pic leaves one with a good feeling about two
18-year-olds and Nick's unusual friends (all of
Nick's band members are gay except him). If you're
over the age of fifty, the film may not be your
cuppa—unless you have the imagination that
takes you back to one night decades ago that you
fell in love.
Rated PG-13. 90
minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

Patrik-Ian Polk's
Noah’s Arc:
Jumping the Broom
Opens Friday, October 24, 2008
A Different Happily Ever After:
Noah’s Arc: Jumping the Broom
Starring: Darryl
Stephens; Jenson Atwood; Jason Steed; Gary Leroi
Gray; Christian Vincent; and Rodney Chester.
Reviewed by William
S. Gooch
It is often said
that the only constant in life is change and that
change does not come without struggle. In Noah’s
Arc: Jumping the Broom gay African American
couples take a long, hard look at what it takes
to maintain a relationship and if that struggle
is worth the effort. Creator Patrik-Ian Polk uses
the ‘Pandora Box’ of gay marriage
as a jumping-off point to discuss a plethora of
issues relevant to gay and straight couples. Polk
brilliantly demonstrates in this feature film
that same sex couples have the same issues around
trust, monogamy, career, and friendship as heterosexual
couples. And that what is most important at the
end of the day is having knowledge of self and
staying true to one’s convictions.
In Noah’s
Arc: Jumping the Broom, Noah (Darryl Stephens)
and Wade (Jenson Atwood) travel with their friends
to Wade’s parents’ summer home in
Martha’s Vineyard to have a private marriage
ceremony. Noah’s friends doubt the viability
of Wade and Noah’s union while grappling
with their own relationship issues. Things get
complicated when Baby Gat (Jason Steed)—a
British hip-hop artist who has a jones for Noah—shows
up unexpectedly. Polk also cleverly inserts a
trickster character (Brandon, played by Gary Leroi
Gray) in the film. (The trickster character—a
remnant of medieval dramas as well as West African
folk tales—tests and pushes the main characters
of a story or play to some universal truth.) True
to form, Brandon creates drama between the couples
causing them to re-evaluate their commitment.
As the grain of sand in the oyster, Brandon also
confronts issues and asks questions that the others
are not quite brave enough to ask.
As Noah,
Darryl Stephens brings the inimitable wit and
charm that made his character popular on the Logo
series Noah’s Arc. In Noah’s
Arc: Jumping the Broom we see a mature Noah
not saddled with the indecisive bad choices of
the Noah from the series. And the lovemaking scenes
between Noah and Wade are probably the most tenderly
romantic scenes in the history of gay filmmaking.
Jenson Atwood
has also added more layers to the character of
Wade. This is a more confident Wade, who though
still having trust issues with Noah is willing
to stay the course. Polk employs dialogue that
shows Wade’s vulnerability and maturity
in a way that did not completely come across in
the series.
Other standouts
in the cast are Christian Vincent (Ricky) and
Rodney Chester (Alex). Polk positions Alex as
the well-meaning drama queen who is on the verge
of an amphetamine-induced nervous breakdown. And
Polk opens up Ricky more to feelings of uncertainty
and longing.
Although gay marriage
is the premise for Noah’s Arc: Jumping
the Broom, Polk uses gay marriage as a proscenium
to frame much larger issues that we all struggle
with. Never politicizing the issue, Polk unapologetically
presents the possibility that gay men of color
can love each, commit to each other, and create
their happily ever after.

Jeanne Moreau and Hippolyte
Girardot in Amos Gitai's
One Day You'll Understand (Plus tard)
Amos Gitai's
One Day You'll Understand (Plus tard)
Opens October 31, 2008
Written By: Marie
Jose Sanselme, Amos Gitai, story by Dan Franck,
Jerome Clement based on Jerome Clement's book
Starring: Jeanne
Moreau; Hippolyte Girardot; Emmanuelle Devos;and
Dominique Blanc
Kino International
Reviewed for New
York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: C
Faded colors, an
irritating, repetitious clarinet theme on the
soundtrack, and generally inert performances add
up to a movie lacking cinematic appeal. Amos Gitai's
One Day You'll Understand would look
better on the stage of a small theater or on cable
TV than on the big screen. Not that Gitai is anything
but well-meaning. The Haifa-born, 58-year-old
Israeli filmmaker, whose helicopter was shot down
by a Syrian missile during the Yom Kippur War
in 1973, is perhaps best noted for his fictional
film Kippur, which is based on that incident.
The occurrence led Gitai to quit architecture
as a profession and become a filmmaker. That film,
which evokes the grueling chaos of war, does not
prepare us for the inertia that surrounds Plus
tard.
Spoken in French
with English subtitles, One Day You'll Understand,
whose title sets us up for a large secret that
an aging character finally reveals, ultimately
disappoints in that the "secret" is
hardly earth-shaking. Jeanne Moreau takes a principal
role as Rivka, who delays explaining to her Catholic-raised
son Victor Bastien (Hippolyte Girardot) the mysteries
surrounding a declaration of Aryan status by Rivka's
now deceased husband during France's Vichy regime
of the early 1940's. Gitai's shift to the 1980's
broadcast of high-ranking Nazi Klaus Barbie's
trial in France for wartime atrocities jogs Victor's
memories and curiosity. Victor, his wife Francoise
(Emmanuelle Devos) and two teen children travel
to a village where Rivka's parents hid out without
success from the Nazi puppet government. (A long
tracking shot shows the man and woman dancing
gracefully in better times.)
Much of the time
we in the audience must watch Victor, who appears
clinically depressed even when sharing an evening
meal with his mom. Rivka does all she can to deflect
Victor's probing about his family ancestry.
Moreau is a consummate
performer bogged down with a languorous script.
The interminable dialogue, for which French films
are famous, combines with some of the most annoying
clarinet music on the soundtrack, to yield a film
that could make us yearn for the old Gitai, particularly
for a new look at his grueling Kippur.
Not Rated.
94 minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

Marc Forster's
Quantum of Solace
Opens Friday November
14, 2008
Written
By: Paul Haggis, Neal Purvis
Starring:
Daniel Craig; Olga Kurylenko; Mathieu Amalric;
Judi Dench; Giancarlo Giannini; Gemma Arterton;
and Jeffrey Wright
Columbia Pictures
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: C-
James Bond has
a split personality, the first character an urbane,
sophisticated fellow who can beat the speed of
any Starbucks barista in making cappuccino and
who likes his martinis shaken, not stirred; the
second one, a cold Robocop type of fellow with
enough charm to wow the women but likely to drink
Folger's freeze-dried coffee with half-and-half
and sugar and take his alcohol as straight Scotch.
Gaze at the posters made for the 1963 From
Russia With Love and you'll find Bond, played
by Sean Connery, with a smile on his face, a simple
gun in his hand, and a couple of women discreetly
in the background. Now check out the poster for
Quantum of Solace and you'll locate a
blue-eyed, no-nonsense agent with a machine gun
in his palm, looking as though he has to go to
the men's room but is ashamed to tell his squeeze.
You can tell whether a person is over 40 or under
that age by asking which Bond is preferred. The
older people will opt for Sean Connery's characterization,
the younger, for Daniel Craig's. I'll vote with
the older crowd.
It would be nice
to say at the very least that Marc Forster's Quantum
of Solace is a victory of style over substance.
However there's little of either on display, despite
an array of locations from Siena, Italy, to Colon,
Panama that stands in for the capital of Haiti.
To keep up with political correctness, there have
not been any bimbos in recent Bond vehicles: the
beautiful Olga Kurylenko, who comes from Ukraine,
no exception. But heck, can't be have a few double
entendres, some more skin within PG-13 limitations,
a Bond who is vulnerable enough to be captured
and almost killed? How about a villain made believable
by stroking a white cat while addressing "Mr.
Bond"? There is, however, a convoluted story
that occasionally peeks out from the car chases,
the boat chases, the horses on exhibit in Siena,
the jumping from roof to roof while smashing glass
ceilings without harm to life and limb. Can we
have a bad guy whose eyes blink even once rather
than a short, scrawny Mathieu Amalric, slumming
here after his great performance last year in
The Divine Bell and the Butterfly, where
ironically he does nothing BUT blink in the role
of a paralyzed magazine executive?
Daniel Craig, who
will hopefully dazzle us in the upcoming movie
Defiance, about a group of Jews during
the 1940s who fought back against the Nazis, is
forgettable in Quantum, a tale that finds
Bond immersed in conflict with both his boss,
M (Judi Dench, once again trying to rein in her
favorite agent for killing the wrong people) and
with Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric), aptly named
as he comes off as an ecological hero but who
instead compels Medrano (Joaquin Cosio) to cede
him his country's desert land in return for financing
his coup with a trunk full of Euros. (We hear
something about Greene's desire to control the
region's water, not oil, but blink once and you'll
miss the reason.)
There's nothing
here that we don't find in scores, nay, hundreds
of action-adventure pics. Three scripters could
not make the plot less cloudy—Paul Haggis,
Neal Purvis and Robert Wade)—but maybe producer
Barbara Broccoli could get more sense and subsequent
audience interest if instead she hired the writers
for Jay Leno's Tonight Show. Even the occasional
subtitles for some spoken Italian, Spanish and
Creole and the occasional appearance of the great
stage actor, Jeffrey Wright, in the role of a
CIA agent who might be in cahoots with the thugs,
cannot hide the fact that Quantum of Solace
simply does not raise the pulse, provide irony
or wit, or deliver the goods that Bond conveyed
at an increasingly distant time in the past.
Rated PG-13. 106
minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

Jonathan Demme's
Rachel Getting Married
Opens Friday, September 3, 2008
Starring: Anne Hathaway;
Rosemarie DeWitt; Mather Zickel; Bill Irwin;
Anna Deavere Smith; Anisa George; Emma Tunde Adebimpe;
and Debra Winger
Reviewed by Allison
Ford
Anne Hathaway is
great in Rachel Getting Married. It's
just too bad that her character doesn't inhabit
a better movie.
Hathaway is raw,
awkward, and confrontational as Kym, a recovering
addict who returns home to attend her older sister's
wedding. Her presence stirs up long-suppressed
emotions and family tragedy, all in the midst
of a joyous wedding weekend in which Kym feels
out of place and disconnected.
Director Jonathan
Demme's (Silence of the Lambs) vision
for the film was that it should evoke "the
most beautiful home movie ever made." It
is shot on location, and the grainy, hand-held
camerawork follows the actors as they improvise
and stage scenes with little rehearsal or preparation.
While purporting to offer a more authentic and
natural way to make films, the problem with this
organic, unrehearsed style is that it is all too
easy to lose any sense of plot or dramatic tension.
The scenes meander along, sometimes becoming interesting,
but often not. There's just not much that propels
the film forward. The cast, which includes not
only Hathaway but also screen legend Debra Winger,
does their best to insert some urgency into scenes
where meaningful glances and snarky insults substitute
for a plot, but many moments just hang suspended
in time, with nothing to anchor them to the story.
Demme's idea of creating an intimate home movie
is admirable, but he forgets that most people
don't particularly enjoy watching other people's
home movies.
The wedding itself
is a mélange of multiculturalism and politically
correctness. Demme uses real friends and family
as extras in order to create the illusion of a
shared emotional experience. At first it seems
that Demme is making a statement by juxtaposing
the harshness of Kym with the saccharine ridiculousness
of an interracial couple from Connecticut getting
married in a Hindi ceremony surrounded by Brazilian
dancers and new-age chanters, but as the film
progresses, it becomes obvious that he's serious.
The extras quickly grow wearisome as they give
long-winded congratulatory speeches, dance to
world music, and engage in various other displays
of kumbaya togetherness. The film was more interesting
when Kym was a dysfunctional fish out of water
amidst the lovefest. Once she joins in, the film
loses much of its edge. Extended sequences of
dancing and singing are interminable. If this
is what Kym had to put up with her whole life,
we begin to understand why she used so many drugs.
Demme doesn't
use any soundtrack for the film, but rather prominently
features real musicians as wedding performers.
There are always random violinists, sitar players,
and ululating singers lounging about in every
scene, providing a sort of live soundtrack, but
they often take over, distracting the audience
from the emotional urgency of the film. The music
is nice enough, but it's difficult to see where
it fits in with the story. At times, it seems
like the whole point of Rachel Getting Married
is just to showcase the director's musician friends.
The dynamic of
Kym and her family is stilted and difficult, and
their history includes a momentous tragedy. The
film would have been more interesting had it focused
on the 'I –love-you-I-hate-you' relationships
between Kym, her sister, her mother, and her father,
who can't seem to make up their mind how they
feel about each other. Those complicated relationships
are the truest things in the movie; people's feelings
that change from moment to moment. But trying
to find some resolution between them, especially
when Kym asks "Did I give up my right to
any amount of love?" would have proved to
be more satisfying. As it is, Kym's many attempts
at atonement and reconciliation go ignored, especially
by her sanctimonious sister. The film's few tense
moments aren't worked out; they're immediately
abandoned for more belly-dancing.
Admirably,
the film isn't afraid of creating unlikable characters,
and there are plenty to choose from. The problem,
though, isn't that the characters are flawed and
difficult – the problem is that it's hard
to care. It's hard to muster up any amount of
sympathy for anyone, save Kym, an interesting,
tempestuous, and human character. Anne Hathaway
is a fine actress who's obviously not afraid of
getting messy. Her nuanced and sympathetic portrayal
of a woman struggling to get by deserves a far
better story than the rambling, haphazard "home
movie" she is forced to exist within

Larry Charles'
Religulous
Opens October 3, 2008
Written
By: Bill Maher
Starring: Steve Burg; Jose Luis De Jesus Miranda;
Bill Maher; Andrew Newberg.
Lionsgate
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B+
There may be no
atheists in foxholes, but you could hardly say
that Bill Maher, one of the America's most celebrated
stand-up comedians, is bogged down in such uncomfortable
and fearful surroundings. Maher lets it all hang
loose and makes fun of some of the people he interviews
in Religulous (a combination of "religion"
and "ridiculous"), but generally he
laughs at them after he has left them and is looking
at the film stock in the comfort of the editing
room.
Maher, born of a Roman Catholic father and Jewish
mother, did not know until his teens about his
mom's religious background. Brought up Catholic,
at some point in his life he became a doubter.
Maher both scripted and took a starring role in
Religulous. Under the direction of Borat
director Larry Charles, he comes off sometimes
as an atheist and other times as an agnostic.
In the concluding moments, for example, he berates
those who "know" what is going to happen
to us after we die, stating that he, Maher, doesn't
know and others do not have higher mental processes
than he—which would tag him as an agnostic,
or one who "doesn't know." But mostly
throughout the film he laughs at so-called miracles
that are reported to him by his many subjects,
ridiculing the idea of a talking snake or a man
who lived for three days inside a whale.
Religulous
puts Maher in Michael Moore country, as a documentarian
who does not take himself with dead seriousness
except when he expresses fears about nuclear annihilation.
This makes for grand entertainment without loss
of enlightenment, though one might cavil that
his frequently interrupting his subjects shows
him to be intolerant of people he looks upon as
religious nuts. Detractors could say that perhaps
he is not such a great interviewer, but a sensible
reason is that he wanted to keep the film moving
at a rapid clip. While the documentary does not
cohere as well as almost everything that Michael
Moore put his stamp on—it will come off
to some viewers as a series of Saturday Night
Live skits— Religulous is
a lot of fun, with several laugh-out-loud moments.
One moment which is more embarrassing (to me)
than comical takes place in Orlando, Florida,
where a religious theme park draws tourist with
digital cameras who photograph Christ's march
with a huge cross to Calvary.
Interviewing a
diverse group from assorted parts of the world—Mormons
in Salt Lake, Muslims in Jerusalem, Jews in Monsey,
New York, Catholics in the Vatican, Protestants
in Amsterdam—Maher puts together a collage
of individuals, the great majority of whom are
devout, some going so far as to accept and even
embrace the idea that Jesus will return as The
Second Coming, even knowing the place of arrival
(Megiddo, Israel). While Maher obviously has little
use for religious piety, he is rightfully afraid
of those who are martyrs to their faith—citing
the 9/11 catastrophe, an array of suicide bombings,
a fatwa, or death-threat against Salman Rushdie
for writing an critique of the Prophet Mohammed.
Maher is certain
that Jesus was not a Jewish carpenter, as some
auto bumper stickers suggest. "A Jewish carpenter,"
quips Maher? "Jews HIRE carpenters."
Most amusing is
director Larry Charles's use of a collection of
archival films to punctuate Maher's points - some
are edited clips of religious films going back
to the silent era which last two seconds, others,
not much longer, are examples of hilarious kitsch.
For the most part Maher acts in a friendly manner,
coaxing stumbling responses from some who put
themselves into foxholes of their own choosing.
Among the most arrogant (but in a comical way)
is Jose Luis de Jesus Miranda, a preacher with
a following of 100,000, who claims that he is
the second coming of Christ. Senator Mark Pryor
of Alabama, an evangelical, took away Maher's
punch line when he said that admission to a senate
seat does not require an I.Q. test. Pryor believes—and
hopes for—the end of this world (aside:
some pundits think the end of the world will arrive
if the House of Representative does not pass the
Bush bailout bill). And this suicidal legislator
is a Democrat. What must Republicans think?
The movie is framed
by Maher's stance in Megiddo, which will purportedly
be the center of Armageddon at the end of the
world. In the final couple of minutes, Bill Maher
becomes serious (miracles do happen after all)
warning non-believers, at least in America where
they form sixteen percent of the population, to
stand up and be heard. Be my guest: not everyone
can afford a bodyguard as Maher can.
Rated R. 101 minutes.
© 2008 by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics
Online
Darren Lynn Bousman’s
Repo! The Genetic Opera
Opens November 7, 2008
Written By: Darren Smith
and Terrance Zdunich
Starring: Anthony Stewart Head; Alexa Vega; Paul
Sorvino; Terrance Zdunich; Bill Moseley; Nivek
Ogre; Paris Hilton; and Sarah Brightman.
Lionsgate/ Twisted
Pictures
Reviewed by William
S. Gooch
Rocky Horror for the XX
Generation
When I was a junior in
college a bunch of friends dragged me to The
Rocky Horror Picture Show. Being sober and
out of costume, The Rocky Horror Picture Show
didn’t excite or make me laugh. I only
enjoyed seeing my inebriated friends have a good
time mimicking Frankenfurter and Magenta. Only
later when I loosed up and began to understand
camp did I truly appreciate Rocky Horror
for the enduring cult classic it is.
An appreciation for camp, slasher movies, and
theatre of the absurd is a prerequisite for stomaching
Repo: The Genetic Opera. Starring Paul
Sorvino, Sarah Brighton, Alexa Vega, Anthony Stewart-Head,
and Paris Hilton, Repo: The Genetic Opera
weaves a tale of betrayal, family dysfunction,
and organ repossession. Yea, you heard me right
the first time, organ repossession!!
Set in the not so distant future, an epidemic
of organ failure causes people to buy organ transplants
on credit. If monthly payments are missed, transplants
are repossessed by an entrails-gutting Repo Man.
Only a Chicago slaughterhouse or a down home hog
killing has more gore and chopped carcasses than
the organ repossession scenes.
As the aging CEO of GeneCo, the biotech firm that
offers organ transplants, Rotti Largo (Paul Sorvino)
is conflicted about who should inherit GeneCo.
Should he leave GeneCo to his roid-raged, carnivore
sons (Ogre and Lavi), or his plastic surgery-addicted,
sexpot of a daughter, Amber Sweet (Paris Hilton)?
Also, Nathan (Anthony Stewart-Head), a surgeon
for GeneCo, is conflicted by his desire to control
his sickly teenage daughter (Alexa Vega) and his
love for the vision-impaired chanteuse Blind Mag
(Sarah Brighton).
Repo: The Genetic
Opera’s score is a cross between 80s
rocker groups Wendy Williams and the Plasmatics
and Quiet Riot and the rock opera Tommy, with
a sprinkling of melodies one might find in Sir
Andrew Lloyd-Webber’s Jesus Christ Superstar
or Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat.
Most of the songs are forgettable; only “Chormaggio,”
beautifully sung by Sarah Brighton, is worth noting.
One would think
that this type of vehicle would give Paul Sorvino
an opportunity to show off his fine, classically
trained voice. Unfortunately, Darren Smith and
Terrance Zdunich’s monotone, workaday score
doesn’t do much to highlight Sorvino’s
fine instrument. As Amber Sweet, Paris Hilton
gives an appropriately self-absorbed, vapid performance.
Sarah Brightman is the one bright light in this
film. Her clarion voice rises above the weak score,
and she brings arch and conviction to her portrayal
of Blind Mag.
Repo: The Genetic
Opera may become a cult classic like its
proverbial predecessor, Rocky Horror.
It has all the right ingredients; an incredulous
storyline; a few memorable songs, and campy performances.
Imagine, late night showings with folks dressed
up like the Repo Man!! Entirely possible.

Sarah Brightman in Repo!
The Genetic Opera
Darren Lynn
Bousman’s
Repo! The Genetic Opera
Opens November 7, 2008
Written By: Darren Smith
and Terrance Zdunich
Starring: Anthony Stewart Head; Alexa Vega; Paul
Sorvino; Terrance Zdunich; Bill Moseley; Nivek
Ogre; Paris Hilton; and Sarah Brightman.
Lionsgate/ Twisted
Pictures
Reviewed for New
York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: C
Fans of Broadway musicals
tired of the same ol', the revivals, the saccharine
romantic music of Andrew Lloyd Webber, may be
curious about Repo! The Genetic Opera,
which almost ironically, has a part for Webber
favorite and former squeeze, Sarah Brightman.
This is an opera all right—though the term
may scare away the principal audience of midnight,
cultish classics like The Rocky Horror Show.
The sounds are as dissonant as you can get, perhaps
even able to irritate the ears of the father of
atonal Broadway musicals, Stephen Sondheim.
Repo!,
which evokes the dark production style of Tim
Burton, famed for such notable works as Beetlejuice,
Batman Forever, and Edward Scissorhands,
has the misfortune of being pitched at a high
level throughout—no time for a breather,
a quiet moment. Nor are the gory details prolonged
for a sufficient time to get the audience either
nauseated or bent over with ironic laughter. Fans
of Hostel and Hostel II may
find it insufficiently gory particularly since
the entire picture is shot without the benefit
of bright lights or with individuals for whom
one might feel pity.
The drama takes
place in the year 2050. one involving the macabre
duties of a company called GeneCo, which is profiting
from an epidemic of human organ failures. GeneCo
for a price will furnish a sick individual with
what is needed, whether that be a kidney, a heart,
a small or large intestine, a concept may remind
one of the need of three characters in the G-rated
The Wizard of Oz.
Darren Lynn Bousman, equipped for the project
from his background as director of Saw II,
III and IV, helms scripters
Darren Smith and Terrance Zdunich's opera based
on their stage play in L.A. The company sounds
like just what the doctor ordered, except that
when a patient defaults on payments (apparently
none of the health plans adopted during the administration
of America's forty-fourth president covers transplants),
a repo man is sent to foreclose: to cut open the
individual in default and reclaim the organ. A
second string involves the guilt feeling of a
scientist cum repo man, Nathan (Anthony Stewart
Head), who believes he is to blame for his wife's
death and subsequent illness of his daughter,
Shilo (Alexa Vega—who looks grown up after
her duties years ago in Spy Kids). At the head
of GeneCo is the smirking Rotti Largo (Paul Sorvino)
who gives the order to repossess organs to the
repo man, aided by his psychotic sons Luigi (Bill
Moseley) and Pavi (Nivek Ogre).
Alexa Vega turns
in a convincing performance as the one of the
few innocents in the story, a seventeen-year-old
eager to learn the cause of her mother's death,
while Sarah Brightman almost conveys the resonance
of Andrew Lloyd Webber musicals in her portrayal
of one Blind Mag. Paris Hilton does OK in a thankfully
limited role.
The entire movie
seems to have been acted out while director Bousman
was taking a nap, not an easy thing to do given
the riotous nature of the jarring music. For a
classier choice, rent or buy the DVD of Tim Burton's
Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street,
which has the disciplined script of John Logan
and the superb sounds of Stephen Sondheim, still
the stage composer par excellence in the U.S.
today. Then again the whole project is apparently
a spoof of the horror genre, as though to say,
"What's there to criticize? We're deliberately
sending up the form!"
Not Rated. 98 minutes.
© 2008 by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics
Online

Gina Prince-Bythewood
The Secret Lives of Bees
Opens October 17, 2008
Written By: Gina Prince-Bythewood,
from Sue Monk Kidd's novel
Cast: Queen Latifah: Dakota Fanning; Jennifer
Hudson; Alicia Keys; and Sophie Okonedo
Fox Searchlight
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B
Some people are
still surprised that teenagers and pre-teens show
signs of depression—though Prozac and other
mood-changing drugs are being prescribed for them
at record numbers. Psychologists say that the
root of much depression is feelings of guilt,
a situation that the lead character in Gina Prince-Bythewood's
The Secret Life of Bees is undergoing.
She may have good reason to feel guilty since
she accidentally shot her mother dead at the age
of four and is being brought up by a single father
who is physically abusive as he had demonstrated
when his wife was packing up to run away for good.
Ms. Prince-Bythewood
(Love & Basketball) directs her film
at a relaxed pace, in tune with life in South
Carolina during the 1960s, with a few bursts of
violence outside the home deal from white crackers'
beating up a young woman on her way to register
to vote and with other white racists' roughing
up a young black man for sitting in a movie theater
with a white teenage girl.
Female centered
and likely to be called by some a chick flick,
Bees follows an exodus from home of fourteen-year-old
Lily (Dakota Fanning) after one more beating from
her dad (Paul Bettany). With caretaker Rosaleen
Daise (Jennifer Hudson) in tow, she discovers
that the manufacturer of bottles of honey lives
nearby. Upon introducing themselves, Lily and
Rosaleen are warmly welcomed into a "Pepto-Bismol
pink" house run by August Boatwright (Queen
Latifah) and her sisters—cellist June (Alicia
Keyes) and a neurotically sensitive May (Sophie
Okonedo). As Lily helps out with the bee hives,
she responds to the love that has grown among
the sisters and her, particularly from the counseling
of the strong-willed August—who maintains
that bees, like every other living thing, need
love.
Adding richness
to the plot are the relationship of Lily with
a young black man and that of another, marriage-minded
fellow with the most independent sister of the
Boatwright clan. The Secret Life of Bees
is as honey-sweet as Sue Monk Kidd's novel, but
not cloying. The film premiered at the Toronto
International Film Festival.
Rated PG-13. 110
minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

Danny Boyle's
Slumdog Millionaire
Opens Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Written
By: Simon Beaufoy from Vikas Swarup's novel Q&A
Co-directed by Loveleen Tandan
Starring: Dev Patel; Freida Pinto; Madhur Mittal;
Anil Kapoor; and Irrfan Khan
Fox Searchlight/
Warner Bros.
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: A-
Slumdog Millionaire
gives us a vivid view of a country that tourists
rarely see—a kaleidoscopic view of residents
who live in slums the likes of which you'd not
find in the poorest areas of the U.S.. The film's
cinematographer, Anthony Dod Mantell, aptly captures
the movement and boundless energy in India's largest
city, Mumbai. The result is a tension-filled,
one that combines the genres of gangster movie,
comedy, and romance.
Trainspotting
director Danny Boyle has created a rag-to-riches
tale, an epic story of a family's upward social
movement. Charles Dickens surely must smile in
his grave as he follows Slumdog's rich
screenplay, which Simon Beaufoy adapted from Vikas
Swarup's novel Q&A.
The story centers
on an orphaned, uneducated waiter from Mumbai,
who appears on the TV show "Who Wants To
Be a Millionaire?" and is thrown into jail
for allegedly knowing the questions in advance.
Briefly put: Jamal (Dev Patel) appears on a popular
TV quiz show and is asked questions that could
net him up to twenty million rupees. He corectly
answers such queries as "Who is the third
member of Dumas' The Three Musketeers
and 'Whose face is on the U.S. one hundred dollar
bill?.' The moderator, Prem (Anil Kapoor), refuses
to believe that an uneducated guy could know the
answers and reports him to the police.
In flashbacks Jamal
shows us in the audience that there is a basis
for his knowledge, that book learning is not everything.
Here are some of his experiences…After the
child Jamal and his brother Salim lose their mother
in a Hindu-Muslim riot, they, together with seven-year-old
Latika (Rubina Ali), join up with a Fagin-like
character who runs a school for petty criminals.
The school's head is greedy and vicious enough
to blind one beggar, as this would bring in double
the money. Latika stays on, but Salim and Jamal
run away. In exile, Jamal gains enough experiences
to answer the questions on the show, but money
aside, we also learn that Jamal carries a torch
for his childhood sweetheart, Latika—who
pops up in the move later as a beautiful young
adult (Freida Pinto). Jamal is determined to find
her and whisk her off into the sunset.
Wildly comedic
parts are few but worth waiting for. In one scene,
scores of youngsters run to a helicopter to see
a noted actor, but Jamal, locked inside the outhouse
by his pals, escapes by holding his nose, diving
straight into the sewage, and escaping through
an opening in the ground. His arrival to the actor's
side clears the crowd.. In the funniest scene,
Salim and Jamal become impromptu guides outside
the Taj Mahal, giving tourists their own version
of the background.
Filming in a city with nineteen million residents
must have been a nightmare. We also wonder how
the film crew got permission to clear Victoria
Station to film a rousing dance during the end
credits.
With its mostly
non-professional actors, Slumdog Milliionaire
will likely be nominated in recognition of its
vivid cinematography, its grueling study of torture
by police who believe Jamal is cheating, and the
cruelty of adults who stop at nothing to exploit
child labor—even gouging out the eyes of
one unfortunate tyke. English is spoken almost
throughout, but when the dialogue includes a few
words of Marathi, the subtitles appear mercifully
around the middle of the screen rather than at
the bottom.
Rated R. 120 Minutes.
© Harvey Karten Member, NY Film Critics Online

Philip Seymour Hoffman,
Michelle Williams
and Tom Noonan in Charlie Kaufman's Synecdoche,
New York
Charile Kaufman’s
Synecdoche, New York
Opens October 24, 2008
Starring: Philip
Seymour Hoffman; Catherine Keener; Samantha Morton;
Emily Watson; Michelle Williams; Tom Noonan; Jennifer
Jason Leigh; and Diane Weist
Reviewed by Frank
J. Avella
Spawned from the
effusively imaginative mind of scripter Charlie
Kaufman, Synecdoche, New York is not
a movie for all tastes but for those filmgoers
who appreciate an auteur’s original screen
vision, this one’s a must. And a must. And
a must. I suggest three viewings to begin to appreciate
the work.
Kaufman received
Oscar nominations for the brilliantly beguiling
Being John Malkovich and the absorbing
Adaptation, both directed by Spike Jonze.
He won the Academy Award for the dazzling and
frenetic Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless
Mind, directed by Michel Gondry. With Spike
Jonze unavailable to direct, Kaufman decided to
make his feature debut, with wildly mixed to successful
results.
Shockingly, Synecdoche,
New York begins with an almost conventional
Act One. Hypochondriac Caden Cotard (Philip Seymour
Hoffman who does enigmatic like no one else) is
a theatre director working on a radical version
of Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman—radical,
that is, for regional theatre. He lives with his
cranky and restless artist wife Adele (Catherine
Keener, who makes an indelible impression even
though she disappears from the film way too early)
and their four-year old daughter Olive (Sadie
Goldstein). Adele leaves Caden to pursue her passion
in Germany and that propels him on a fascinating,
self-reflexive artistic journey that takes him
the rest of his life and beyond to figure out.
Act Two of Caden’s
life involves his obsession with missing Adele,
his romance with box office manager, Hazel (a
fantastic Samantha Morton) and his remarriage
to his leading lady (Michelle Williams). In the
seemingly never-ending Act Three, Caden receives
a prestigious grant and buys/rents a Hindenburgian
size space to stage a work about his life. The
play takes on mega-proportions, in every sense,
as he begins to cast the characters in his life,
who soon become characters in his life and he
must then cast characters for the characters…the
painting within the painting within the painting
within…getting a headache yet? A marvelous
headache.
In Caden’s
attempt to create a pure theatre piece he falls
into an artistic and psychological abyss that
he never quite recovers from and this is where
the film bogs down a bit.
To pour on more
plot at this point would be to ruin the many psycho-cinematic
joys and mind-boggling frustrations that are to
be experienced and mentally tax myself in the
process. And to give too many of my own interpretations
would be to deprive the audience member of bringing
their own analysis to this deeply personal yet
cleverly universal thesis on life, love, death,
depression, disease, obsession and madness. Suffice
to say, for me the film questions our constant
craving for meaning in everything that occurs
in our lives. It’s about life imitating
art and art imitating life funneled through Kaufman’s
cuckoo glass-half-empty outlook. So much for my
ceasing with the analysis.
Tonal shifts abound
and the results are odd but sometimes incredibly
poignant as in a scene between the older, dying
Olive and Caden. The segment is incredibly bizarre,
completely ridiculous and, yet, overwhelmingly
touching. He also fucks with time in a very engaging
way.
Kaufman loves to
sprinkle the work with many a lunatic touch that
gives the film a dream-like feel. My favorite
was Hazel’s house being perpetually on fire.
No explanation was given and it was sheer cinematic
bliss. I wanted more of these eccentric but affecting
touches.
The entire ensemble
work perfectly together with Morton doing some
of her most impressive work as Hazel and Emily
Watson proving hilarious as the actress portraying
Hazel.
Kaufman is like
a depressed Federico Fellini or Woody Allen on
hallucinogens. Sometimes he can be too clever
for our own good (yes, OUR own good), but his
cinematic insanity is always fascinating and pure
and in Synecdoche, New York he leaves
the viewer baffled yet exhilarated and wanting
more.
Note: ‘Synecdoche’
(sih-NECK-doh-key) is a term that can mean a part
used for the whole or a whole that stands for
a part.
Yikes!

Nacho Vigalondo's
Time Crimes (Los Cronocrimenes)
Opens December 5, 2008
Written By: Nacho Vigalondo
Starring: Karra Elejalde; Candela Fernandez; Barbara
Goenaga; Nacho Vigalondo; and Juan Inciarte
Magnet Releasing
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B
The public finds
time travel fascinating at least since Jules Verne's
20,000 League Under the Sea which predicted
the later invention of the submarine. Writers
of such sci-fi is are not simply telling imaginative
stories: they may be making points about the state
of the world in their own time while prognosticating
the sort of future that will emerge, given current
conditions, e.g. George Orwell's "1984. H.G.
Wells' The Time Machine introduced primary
school students to the world of the future in
a book written with appropriate short sentences.
Nacho Vigalondo's movie Timecrimes, or
Cronocrimenes as it is known in its native
Spain, introduces some horror in the sci-fi, but
this just might be the only film of the genre
that is so modest that the time traveler does
not go more than a few hours into the past. By
doing this, the adventurer can actually look at
himself, as the 50-ish Hector (Karra Elejalde)
does, with a journey that affords him even more
time to feel regrets. If only he had not been
peering into the woods that surrounded his spacious
house in Northern Spain, as doing this allowed
him to spot a comely young woman (Barbara Goenaga)
taking off her clothes inexplicably. Keeping his
sightiing a secret from his wife Clara (Candela
Fernandez), he ambles on into the forest, which
results in an identity crisis that finds him ready
to commit suicide—or rather to kill two
other people named Hector who look surprisingly
like him.
Timecrimes
virtually announces itself as a B picture with
its bare-bones budget but with the ambition of
titillating the audience into wondering not only
what comes next, but what came before. When Hector
is stabbed by a man whose head is wrapped completely
inside a bandage, he escapes to a building that
he somehow had never seen before, a lab in which
a young, bearded scientist (Nacho Vigalondo, the
writer-director) directs him to hide inside a
tub filled with white liquid—somehow forgetting
to tell the shlubby fellow that this is a time
machine.
Timecrimes
succeeds more as an intellectual exercise than
the source of chills and thrills, as we in the
audience try to calculate how the twists will
turn out, how the movie will avoid the predictability
of a guy who is reliving his own experiences from
an hour or so ago and which we have all seen as
well. It's allegedly slated for an American remake,
which will predictably ruin it by adding heft
and emphasizing the gore. The piece is well-acted
except by the writer-director, Mr. Vigalondo,
who is so awkward that he fails to develop chemistry
with his guinea pig. Stellar editing by Jose Luis
Romeu elicits the identity crisis, supported by
the occasional, fright-inducing music of Eugenio
Mira.
In Spanish with English subtitles. cronocrimenes.com/eng/index.htm
Rated R. 89 minutes.
© 2008 by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics
Online

Oliver Stone's
W.
Opens October 17, 2008
Written By: Stanley Weiser
Starring: Josh Brolin; Elizabeth Banks; James
Cromwell; Ellen Burstyn; Thandie Newton; Jeffrey
Wright; Scott Glenn; and Ioan Gruffud
Lionsgate
Reviewed by Frank J. Avella
Less than three
weeks remain before America will vote for the
44th President of the United States. It’s
certainly the most important election in my lifetime.
The last eight years have been defined by the
red states decision to welcome a good ol’
boy into the White House: George W. Bush.
Controversial filmmaker
Oliver Stone has decided to break even more ground
by making the first film attempting to analyze
an American president, while he is still in office.
And while W. does delve into the psyche
of Bush, it asks much deeper and vital questions—many
of which can be glossed over by a surface analysis
of the film.
For those looking
for a salacious, scathing and obvious lambasting
of Dubya, you will be disappointed. Stone and
screenwriter Stanley Weiser are more concerned
with subtlety (a striking change for Stone) and
nuance. Many heated events, like the 2000 election,
are barely touched on (see Recount for
a docu-style recreation of that fiasco), and although
we glimpse Kerry once in the film, the 2004 election
goes virtually unmentioned as well.
W. attempts
to probe the man, his flaws and how he came to
be President. The film focuses (a bit too much)
on Bush’s need for his father’s love
and acceptance (a Stone film staple). We are privy
to his resentment of Bush, Sr.’s feeling
bad about brother Jeb’s gubernatorial loss
on the day of Bush, Jr.’s victory. We are
given moments that shape his character, moments
that will ultimately reflect on his eventual chosen
administration: Bush the frat boy; Bush the born-again
Christian who hears the ‘calling’
to be President and Bush taking charge of details
involving his father’s campaign (the idea
of making Massachusetts murderer Willie Horton
a household name--which many believe cost Dukakis
the 1988 election--is attributed to Bush Jr.).
A good deal of
time is devoted to Bush and his keystone cops
advisors making life and death decisions about
Iraq. It could be viewed as nastily satiric if
it wasn’t so close to truth.
Stone theorizes that Bush’s inner circle
have been the real decision makers these past
eight years, a notion even the dumbest of the
dumb can concur with. In a key scene where he
and his cronies debate what to call North Korea,
Iraq and Iran, we can see how terms like “axis
of evil” came to be.
W. can
rightly be called a laugh-out-loud comedy. The
central character is a blundering oaf with mild
aspirations that turn rabid. The film is very
funny whether it’s Bush’s mispronunciations
(‘Guantanamera’ instead of ‘Guantanamo’
and his using ‘misunderestimated’)
or his own statements:
“ Rums, you
know I don’t do nuance, it’s just
not my thing.”
“Fool me
once, shame on you, fool me twice and…and
you can’t get fooled again…”
And while the film
is hilarious, it is also a dense, keen and, ironically,
nuanced portrait of the man.
Josh Brolin is
to be applauded for creating a character when
an impersonation would have superficially sufficed.
Brolin allows us to see the sincerity and earnestness
of the man and how he truly tries his best. We
glimpse the Freudian hurt, the petulance that
gives way to ambition. His W isn’t evil.
He isn’t smart enough to be evil. He isn’t
stupid either, simply mediocre. It’s an
amazing performance and reason enough to see the
film.
The supporting
performance sometimes do come off as impersonations
and Saturday Night Live has raised the bar recently
with Tina Fey’s brilliant and lacerating
embodiment of Sarah Palin as well as Amy Poehler’s
genius take on Hillary Clinton. Still, most of
the actors are to be commended, especially Thandie
Newton’s hilarious, scene-stealing Condoleeza
Rice and Richard Dreyfuss’s terrifying and
bone-chilling Dick Cheney.
Elizabeth Banks
and Ellen Burstyn as Laura and Barbara Bush, respectively,
have more of a difficult time since their characters
aren’t given much dimension.
Stone’s use
of certain patriotic songs (“Battle Hymn
of the Republic, “The Yellow Rose of Texas)
as well as country ditties (“Mamma Don’t
Le Your Babies Grow Up to be Cowboys”) is
extremely effective—if sometimes grating.
Phedon Papamichael’s camerawork is less
frenetic than Stone’s work usually demands
but impressive nonetheless.
Stone, I am certain,
will be slammed for his lack of a heavy-hand.
How dare he not damn the bastard? How dare he
actually ask the audience to sympathize with the
man--to try and understand him?
But those who feel
this way are blind to the larger picture that
Stone is trying to paint: the American dream turned
ass over tit.
Early in the film
Karl Rove (Toby Jones) announces that the election
will be decided by “who Joe-voter wants
to sit down and have a beer with.” And that’s
exactly what happened. The voters decided that
a C-student should run the country. They chose
a good-hearted man who was painfully unqualified
to rule the greatest country in the world and
then decided to blame him for his blunders.
Stone may be too
clever for his own good here, in a different kind
of way than he was with JFK (still one
of the best films of the last thirty years). He’s
chosen a quieter route; instead of slamming his
audience into submission and capitulation, he’s
asking them to take responsibility for their role
in the mess we find ourselves in.
W. is
a reminder of how our country has fallen down
a destructive and mind-boggling rabbit hole. And
the only people to blame for the nightmare, for
the mess created by W, are the American voters.
What will we do
come November? Will we decide that our next leaders
must be intelligent beings who can actually foster
change or will we choose a couple of self-labeled
mavericks who rant and rave about change but really
represent more of the same and who scream about
patriotism but have trouble spelling the word?
A fascinating footnote:
Forty-three years ago, both Oliver Stone and George
W. Bush enrolled at Yale University. One dropped
out to fight in Vietnam and then become a filmmaker.
The other avoided military duty and became President
of the United States.

Oliver Stone's
W.
Opens October 17, 2008
Written By: Stanley Weiser
Starring: Josh Brolin; Elizabeth Banks; James
Cromwell; Ellen Burstyn; Thandie Newton; Jeffrey
Wright; Scott Glenn; and Ioan Gruffud
Lionsgate
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B
If you want one-sided
polemical screeds in your political documentaries,
you can't go wrong by viewing anything by Michael
Moore. We go to the megaplex expecting the same
from other left-liberal and conservative filmmakers,
but you won't get Michael Moore in Oliver Stone.
Stone, politically on the left, nonetheless gave
us a fair reading on Nixon in 1995, perhaps judging
that the viewers would form their impressions
from actual speeches and activities of that disgraced
chief executive. W. is similarly fragmented
, though with not the same huge number of principal
players as Stone's other biopic, yet he does not
use a single member of the Nixon cast
in his analysis of our current leader. In portraying
Bush 43, he uses actors who try to emulate the
real folks in appearance, but Stone is not as
concerned with physical verisimilitude as he is
with the spine of his work: a psychoanalytic portrait
of George W. Bush which attempts to locate the
character of the man and, in doing so, might provide
us with the rationale of his decisions.
The most significant
comment in the over two hours' length of W.
is a paraphrase by Bush's dad of the John Greenleaf
Whittier's quote, "Of all sad words of tongue
or pen/ the saddest are these: It might have been.'"
If George W. Bush had it all to do over again,
would he have favored the same policies he endorsed
during the past seven-plus years? There is no
evidence that he'd change anything. After all
when at a press conference a journalist asked
him for what he considered his two greatest failures
and got the answer, "John, that's a tough
one," and proceeded to hem and haw before
moving on to ignoring the next query. Not the
slightest hesitation about the failed policies
in Iraq and Afghanistan and the refusal to send
in the government regulators until it was too
late—and during his last few months in office.
There is a central
problem in Oliver Stone's movie. Using Stanley
Weiser's script and many exact quotes from Bush
(the film came with footnotes which can be accessed
on the film's promotional website), we in the
audience get quite a bit of psychobabble about
W.'s frustration with his dad's favoritism toward
brother Jeb Bush, giving him the motivation to
do one better. But we do not connect his far-right
ideology with any of this. True enough, his being
born-again would put him in the camp of the pro-lifers.
But why the adamant stance in favor of free markets
vs. government intervention (until just recently)
coupled with the passion to make the Middle East,
nay the world, in America's image?
There is, nonetheless,
quite a bit to admire in a picture that can easily
be followed by those who keep up with political
events and, of course, more difficult to sort
out for those who have toyed with their Playstations
night and day. Josh Brolin takes on the title
role of George W. Bush, an actor who had knocked
out a job in another political movie In the
Valley of Elah. (Political movies have not
fared too well at the box office, so the forty-year-old,
ruggedly handsome Brolin might be recognized more
for his performances in Grindhouse and
in No Country for Old Men.) In virtually
every frame Brolin—now with the president's
gray hair in the early days of our century, now
with the black hair as a pledge for the Deek fraternity
at Yale University—contrasts his early days
as a drunk, a car crasher, a party animal, with
his current role with a base of evangelists and
teetotalers.
We are made privy
from the beginning with Bush's seeking advice
of his top advisors—Secretary of State Condi
Rice (Thandie Newton), V-P Dick Cheney (Richard
Dreyfuss), Republican strategist Karl Rove (Toby
Jones), and Secretary of Defense Colin Powell
(Jeffrey Wright). As an example of the influence
of others, the term "axis of evil" was
not originated by the president but was chosen
by him after some alternate titles were thrown
out. Phedon Papamichael's cameras then move back
to 1966 as Bush is going through a rough pledging
ritual at his college fraternity, whose idea of
a good time is pouring hard liquor into the mouths
of pledges with a funnel as if the brothers are
force-feeding geese for pate. His chemistry with
his future wife, Laura (Elizabeth Banks) is palpable
from the start, but the most meaty dialogue is
between Bush and his dad, George H.W. Bush (James
Cromwell). The forty-first president is ashamed
of his boy's wild youthful antics, his arrest
for drunkenness, his walking off jobs such as
one he held with an oil rig. When George decides
to run for Texas governor, his mom, Barbara Bush
(Ellen Burstyn), recoils: "You must be joking!"
With some time
given to the influence of Reverend Earle Hudd
(Stacy Keach), who helps George make the transition
from fraternity boy to born-again Christian, George
Bush builds a base of support which helps him
to launch his presidential ambition.
Stone and his scripter,
Weiser, do not take us into the campaigns, as
they are concerned principally with a pop-psychoanalysis
of the man. This makes for a highly entertaining,
albeit skimming-the-surface docudrama with strong
performances not only by Brolin but especially
by James Cromwell as the Connecticut Yankee to
his son's more down-home Texas culture. There
is particular merit as well to Richard Dreyfuss's
portrayal of Dick Cheney, a Machiavellian politician
like Karl Rove who is even more gung-ho for seizing
continued access to oil routes around the Straits
of Hormuz and who—as we could likely predict—would
not be offended if we went to war with Iran. The
film was shot principally in Shreveport, Louisiana,
a tale that could have reached for more poetry
and surrealism such as scenes of our president's
playing a metaphoric centerfield in a Texas baseball
stadium.
Rated PG-13. 129
minutes. © 2008 by Harvey Karten Member:
NY Film Critics Online

Tom Gustafson’s
Were the World Mine
speakproductions.com/index2b.php
Opens Friday, November 21, 2008
Reviewed by Frank J. Avella
An absolutely enchanting
addition to the sorely-lacking gay teen musical
genre (you could argue HSM fits that
one--yikes!), Tom Gustavson’s Were the
World Mine blends Shakespeare with a dash
of Disney and comes up with an endearing and delightful
new indie that examines teen acceptance and desire
with that certain gay twist.
The film’s
plot is reminiscent of the off-Broadway musical
Zanna Don’t, which opened a few
years ago. Cute, shy Timothy (terrific newcomer
Tanner Cohen) escapes the everyday bullying world
of high school by lapsing into musical daydreams.
He lives with his apprehensively accepting mother
(Judy McLane) and has a mad crush on the star
Rugby player, Jonathon (adorable and hunky Nathaniel
David Becker). Timothy is soon cast as Puck in
A Midsummer Night’s Dream, directed
by the wonderfully odd Ms. Tebbit (the wonderfully
odd Wendy Robie) and takes it upon himself to
create his own potion and turn the town into same-sex
addicts.
Were the World
Mine features (too few) terrific songs written
by Jessica Fogle, Cory James Krueckeberg (who
co-wrote the screenplay with Gustavson) and some
adapted from Shakespeare.
The cast is collectively
winning with Cohen and Becker making an irresistible
duo. WTWM is sometimes silly, but what
good fantasy musical isn’t. It’s also
refreshing to see a film about young gay love
made with so much heart.

Barry
Levinson's
What Just Happened
Opens October 3, 2008
Written By: Art Linson, from his book "What
Just Happened: Bitter Hollywood Tales From the
Front Line"
Starring: Robert De Niro; Catherine Keener; Sean
Penn; John Turturro; Robin Wright Penn; Stanley
Tucci; Kristen Stewart; Michael Wincott; and Bruce
Willis
Magnolia
Pictures/ 2929 Productions
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B
After I reviewed
a film giving it the Rotten Tomatoes quote, "Pore
Judd is Daid" (taken from a song in Oklahoma),
a fanboy responded, "Judd Apatow is only
the producer," ending his critique with a
pejorative to take the place of my name. I replied
that a producer often has more power in what goes
into a movie than the director, citing both Judd
Apatow (Superbad, Knocked Up)
and Jerry Bruckheimer (Pearl Harbor,
Black Hawk Down). While Barry Levinson
is the director of What Just Happened,we
might wonder how the influence got divided in
that movie: whether the big guy is Mr. Levinson,
whose satire Wag the Dog proved a critical
and box office success, or Robert De Niro, who
is listed as one of the four producers, or perhaps
even Magnolia Pictures, which picked up the pic
at Sundance.
We won't know the
answer, but we do know how the power is divided
in the production of Fiercely, a movie
within this film. While some might assume that
Jeremy Brunell (Michael Wincott), the fictional
director of Fiercely,has the final word,
this might be true of the director's cut which
could come out months later as a DVD, but for
most of What Just Happened, he has been
turned into a supplicant, begging Ben (Robert
De Niro) the producer, and the studio head as
well, Lou Tarnow (Catherine Keener). A film that
has one major twist near the conclusion, What
Just Happened is a parody of the frantic,
competitive Hollywood scene, the sort of satire
already done best in Robert Altman's The Player,
about a paranoid movie exec threatened by a screenwriter,
and not so well in Russell Rosue's The Oscar,
about those competing for Academy Awards.
No question: given
the way the movie industry has been treated, this
Magnolia Pictures entry will evoke the feeling
of déjà-vu. Its bite is not particularly
sharp, but given the array of A-list talent and
some intermittent doses of humor, the picture
goes down easy. We come away concluding that director,
producer and studio head tussle for key elements
in a movie while cutthroat agents might turn up
anywhere, including at a funeral, to steal clients
from others in the profession.
Ben, winningly
played with restraint by Robert De Niro, acts
as a conciliator, comforting Jeremy Brunell (Michael
Wincott), a prima donna director who lives for
art and not for money, insisting that a particularly
cruel ending to his new movie Fiercely
must be kept in. Since studio head Lou Tarnow
(Catherine Keener) wants to soften the edges,
she comes into direct confrontation with the director,
while Ben serves to calm the director down in
deference to the real boss. At the same time,
Ben looks forward to a new film production starring
Bruce Willis, and must try to get that actor to
shave his ugly beard—which Willis refuses
to do, insisting that it is part of his artistic
integrity and identity. Ben, who is paying out
$30,000 a month alimony and child support to his
second wife, Kelly (Robin Wright Penn), still
has feelings for her and she for him after a year
and one-half of divorce, which pushes them to
visit a therapist each week who—in the film's
most comic moments—tries to get them "to
enjoy living apart so much that they will never
want to be together again."
The title is not
only virtually irrelevant: it does not even get
a quote from any of the performers in the story.
Surely a name like The Players carries
more heft, just as it pushes the envelope farther
than What Just Happened. Stanley Tucci
turns in al wryly comic role as Scott Solomon,
an agent who comes into conflict with Ben, while
Sean Penn is featured in a performance of Fiercely—an
actioner that finds him getting shot numerous
times. All in all, a pleasant day at the movies
if hardly on the cutting edge.
Rated R. 107 minutes.
© 2008 by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics
Online

Kevin Smith's
Zack amd Miri Make a Porno
Opens Friday, November 8, 2008
Written By: Kevin Smith
Starring: Seth Rogen; Elizabeth Banks; Craig Robinson;
and Jason Mewes
MGM
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Grade: B
Back in our own
Victorian 1950's, few girls would have sex with
their dates, maybe not even with their steady
boyfriends. If they did, it was not customary
for women to boast of the achievement. Their mothers
told them repeatedly, "Boys won't buy the
cow if the milk is free" Singles believed
that there were two kinds of women: those who
play around, and those whom men want to marry.
The logic is that if you "give away"
your body, the guy to whom you "gave"
it would not consider you marriage material.
Nowadays maxims like these are turned on their
heads. Current theory is that people first become
friends, then romantic partners, then have sex,
and that final step evokes a desire for marriage.
If you don't believe that, see Kevin Smith's Zack
and Miri Make a Porno, about two people who
are just friends, actually roommates, who would
not consider themselves future marriage partners
as that would ruin what they have together. When
the two finally have six, bingo! The rules change.
They realize at that point that they might have
been in love all along. The romantic conclusion
of the movie finds the guy proposing when his
girl is sitting on the toilet. That may not be
like dinner with champagne at New York's Per Se
restaurant, but for them it's the ideal romantic
touch.
Written and directed
by Kevin Smith, whose Clerks and Mallrats
would not be mistaken for Merchant-Ivory
productions, Zack and Miri puts together
a truly funny man, Seth Rogen, and a button-cute
Elizabeth Banks as his roommate. As the title
characters respectively, they live together platonically
but their relationship is being tested by their
empty pockets. Baristasas are not paid like barristers,
so the Starbucks-type coffee pourers (with their
lights and water turned off and eviction threatened),
figured there is money to be made in porn: that
citizens of Red states turn to it as much as those
of us in the Blues, and that the most respected
CEO staying at top hotels around the country will
doubtless pay a little extra to watch porn on
TV with the babes they pick up at the bar.
Assembling a crew
with coffee server Delaney (Craig Robinson) as
producer, Lester (Jason Mewes) as a performer,
and a bevy of bubble-type bimbos in the cast,
they start shooting until the shack they rented
from a scammer is torn down forcing them to use
the coffee shop as studio. Much of the action
is not unlike what you might expect in pornos
(or so I'm told), but the whole point of the movie-making
is to uncover the buried romantic feelings that
Zack has for his roommate, Miri.
The movie barely
ekes out an "R" rating (with the emphasis
on bare), the "F" word is treated as
though the actors get a dollar every time they
use it, and most important, the new connection
that the principals have with each other for mere
titillation by the audience points the way to
their true feelings. Seth Rogen, again with an
Afro-style cut and beard, shows himself to be
one of the funniest men in the movies today, the
guy who may not be Brad Pitt but who wins the
affection of hotties (in the audience as well)
because he makes them laugh. Elizabeth shows a
depth of acting as a highly attractive woman who
can play Laura Bush as well as Miri Linky. As
for those critics who say that the movie is "filthy,"
hey—sex between consenting adults is not
"filthy." Getting splashed with poop
as we see in many a movie today, is. Learn the
difference. As for critics who say that the two
halves of the movie do not mesh, that you cannot
spin a romantic story out of a sophomoric comedy,
the whole point of "Zack and Miri" is
that you certainly can.
Rated R. 101 minutes.
© 2008 by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics
Online
|