|

Andrew Jarecki's
All Good Things
Opens Friday, December 3, 2010
Written By: Andrew Jarecki,
Marc Smerling, Marcus Hinchev
Starring: Ryan Gosling, Kirsten Dunst, Frank Langella,
Philip Baker Hall, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Kristen Wiig,
Zoe Lister Jones
Magnolia Pictures
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
The title of the film comes from the
name of a Vermont health food store owned by a couple
of young, happy people. At least these young people were
happy during the time they worked at the store, but that
was before they moved back to the pressures of New York
City. It’s also, methinks, an implicit statement,
“All good things come to an end.” And so does
the film. The first half is lively, adventurous, varied
and upbeat; the second half is slow, fitful, melodramatic,
and melancholy. The acting is fine across the board, the
makeup on the principal actor deserves awards, in fact
if Saddam Hussein had hired Judy Chin’s department
to redesign his face, the evil dictator could now be living
in up in Martha’s Vineyard as Steven Hackford.
All Good Things is inspired
by the true story of a triple murder, or more accurately
two murders that produced actual corpses and one involving
a missing person who was almost certainly hacked up and
fed to the fish. Nobody was convicted of murder, though
one fellow was jailed for a far lesser charge, while the
D.A. seemed to have been bought off from re-opening what
is now a cold case. Writer-director Andrew Jarecki unfolds
the action with enough respect for his audience to avoid
overly melodramatic flourishes. There are no spurts of
blood on the walls, cars do not explode, but in more than
fair compensation we do see Kirsten Dunst’s breasts
in the shower.
Andrew Jarecki, who has garnered a reputation
from his Oscar-nominated doc Capturing the Friedmans
(which like All Good Things is about a Jewish
upper-middle-class father and son involved in crimes),
dramatizes a New York real estate dynasty beginning in
the 1980s. Inspired by the story of the Durst family,
All Good Things looks first upon Sanford Marks (Frank
Langella), who owns a chain of seedy hotels and bordellos
in the Times Square area before those blocks were gentrified
into theaters. Handsome David Marks (Ryan Gosling) has
no intention of going into the business when he meets
beautiful Katie McCarthy (Kirsten Dunst) and marries her
against the advice of his father, (“She’ll
never be one of us”). But when David perceives that
Katie may want more for their lives than a grocery store
in the sticks, he sells out and joins his dad’s
business, showing his wife off as a trophy.
David’s character takes an about-face
during the latter part of the story, as secrets from his
past begin to dominate his life. His mother’s suicide
many years earlier prove to be a dominant black mark on
his psyche, crushing his wife’s desire for a child.
Katie’s wish for a more independent life as a medical
student causes a rift in the relationship. And when David’s
best friend, Lily Rabe (Deborah Lehrman), makes demands,
David’s life unravels further.
Much of the tale is told as a back story
at a trial in which David is accused of the murder of
Malvern Bump (Philip Baker Hall), an lonely old man whom
he had saved from eviction but who had turned against
him after considering himself betrayed. At that point
David is a much older man, made up so expertly with freckles,
with a soft voice that would convince any jury, that we
in the audience might almost be convinced that Jarecki
had substituted a second performer. Ontario-born Gosling
at 30 turned out a more dynamic role this , crosscutting
time periods as the husband of Michelle Williams, in a
rocky marriage portrayed in Derek Cianfrance’s Blue
Valentine. He’s a pleasure to watch as is Kirsten
Dunst, or course, in this mature examination of the role
of class and caste and how easily crimes can be covered
up when you know the right people.
Rated R. 101 minutes. © 2010 by
Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

Richard J. Lewis's
Barney's Version
Opens Friday, December 17, 2010 (limited)
Sony Pictures
Classics
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Written By: Michael Konyves, from Mordecai Richler’s
novel
Starring: Paul Giamatti, Dustin Hoffman, Rosamund Pike,
Minnie Driver
Paul Giamatti’s monumental performance as a cantankerous,
self-destructive TV producer anchors this epic tale of
a man and his three wives. The film is based on a fictitious
memoir of Barney Panofsky penned by the late Mordecai
Richler, to whom the film is dedicated.
Barney's Version finds the title character filled
with a sense of inferiority, a Jewish man who believes
he cannot “fit in” to the overwhelmingly Christian
Quebec. Barney strives to overcome his fears by pushing
himself—not so much for money but for the woman
of his dreams. The film shows us Barney over a period
of forty years, shown in his more youthful years with
a brownish-red, curly rug on his head and a glass of Scotch
virtually affixed to his hand. To some extent Barney is
a mirror reflection of the novelist, who had turned his
back on political correctness to accuse the Quebec Separatist
Movement of anti-Semitism—thereby making his prophesy
come true as critics of his articles in such magazines
at the Atlantic Monthly declared that Richler
is not “a real Quebecer.” (Sound familiar,
fellow Americans?)
Paul Giamatti takes us into the mind
of Barney, who appears to have spent his entire adult
life covering up his insecurities and even his cuddly
aspects which are hidden under a gruff exterior. Michael
Konyves’s script takes us first to Rome, where a
young Barney meets and marries the first and very pregnant
Mrs. Panofsky, a freewheeling Clara played by Rachelle
Lefevre as a woman who may have slept with everyone who
made eye contact with her—thereby making Barney
justly skeptical that the bride is carrying his baby.
During the second phase of the story,
he has a job at a TV production company in Montreal where
he meets and marries into a fabulously rich family, wedding
a Jewish princess (an amusing Minnie Driver) despite the
opposition of her father. Why so? Barney meets the beautiful
Miriam (Rosamund Pike) at his wedding, takes off before
the lavish afternoon is over, and runs to the train in
pursuit of Mariam who is on her way to New York. Barney
pushes and tugs, whines and cajoles until the elegant
radio interviewer, both astonished and puzzled by his
weekly gifts of flowers and sincere professions of amore,
loses all resistance and becomes the third Mrs. P.
The story is motivated by a police detective
whose crime novel accuses Barney of murdering his best
friend, Boogie (Scott Speedman), with whom he shared a
love for the bottle. No body turns up for thirty years,
frustrating the detective who is certain that Barney is
a killer, but in the title character’s own version,
allowing for long lapses of whiskey-filled memory, he
shot Boogie by accident with a the gun given to Barney
by his loving dad and now-retired cop, Izzy (Dustin Hoffman).
Emerging from this two hours and twelve
minutes’ production is a fleshed-out, complex figure,
a man who could have spent his adult life as the husband
of a wealthy Jewish woman and who later screwed up an
alliance with the love of his life. Despite his periodic
drunkenness, Barney was self-aware, yet unable to stop
himself from feeling second-rate despite the sincere,
loving feelings toward him of the second and third Mrs.
Panofsky. This is the kind of movie that brings up the
standard cliche, “I laughed, I cried,” given
the broad and deep characterization of a man who is at
various times comical, tragic and full of life.
Barney’s Version is virtually
guaranteed to be among the ten movies considered for Best
Picture not only at Oscar time but among the various awards
groups, with Giamatti on the short list for best actor
and Pike joining in the fun as Best Supporting Actress.
Not Yet Rated. 132 minutes. © 2010
by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

Duane Baughman and Johnny
O’Hara's
Bhutto
Opens Friday, December 3, 2010
Written By: Johnny O’Hara
Starring: Asif Ali Zardari, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, Bakhtawar
Bhutto Zardari, Assefa Bhutto Zardari, Mark Siegel, Pervez
Musharraf
First Run Features
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Quick: What is the most dangerous country in the world?
No small number of the world’s citizens name the
U.S., given our awesome numbers of nukes, our interventions
in foreign countries, our status as the world’s
only superpower. China? Large,a nuclear power, and able
to bankrupt the U.S. by calling in its loans to us. North
Korea? Nuclear, isolated, paranoid, and unstable. Iran:
not a bad guess, if that republic, led by an unbalanced
president who takes orders from a bearded ayatollah, is
allowed to get the bomb.
Still, a case could be made for Pakistan,
America’s ally. So why should one of our allies
be considered the world’s most dangerous state?
For one thing, if you’re reading the NY Times or
other noted journal about the latest in the WikiLeaks,
that country has some nuclear material relatively unguarded
that could fall into the hands of terrorists. Another
is that tens of millions of that state’s 180 million
citizens—50% of whom are under the age of 18 and
a majority of whom are illiterate—are believed to
be loyal to the Taliban or other anti-Western forces.
As evidence that all is not right, a shining force for
democracy in Pakistan was assassinated while campaigning
for a third term as prime minister, a most unusual person,
the first woman in the Muslim world to be elected to the
highest office.
Duane Baghman and Johnny O’Hara’s
Bhutto is a documentary about the life of Benazir
Bhutto, favored by her statesman father, Zulfikar Ali
Bhutto, over his eldest son, to run for the top job thereby
breaking the Islamic glass ceiling. The doc is informative
enough, briefly scanning the history of Pakistan from
1947 when it broke away from India, then split into two
countries—East Pakistan begetting Bangladesh—though
if you’re looking for Michael Moore you won’t
find a trace in this humorless film. You will find a number
of talking heads such as former U.S. Secretary of State
Condoleeza Rice, President Asif Ali Zardari, who is Benazir
Bhutto’s widower, Pervez Musharraf, a former president
accused in advance by the title character of being behind
her assassination, and assorted western journalists and
Pakistani family members.
Benezir Bhutto can be compared to the
Kennedys in that she came from a wealthy family that appears
to have suffered from a curse. Her father was hanged,
her kid brother was poisoned in the south of France where
he died horribly, her older brother was shot dead, and
she was herself imprisoned by evil General Zia, who ruled
after a coup, for so long in the worst of the country’s
jails that she temporarily lost the power of speech. This
sounds more like a Jacobean revenge play than a Shakespearean
tragedy.
For the most part the interviewees do
not speak against a drab background but filmmakers Duane
Baughman and Johnny O’Hara, working with O’Hara’s
script, are supported by cinematic footage that never
fails to show that every street in Karachi, a representative
large city, looks like Grand Central Station at 5:10 p.m.
on Friday. Some women wear burqas like just about all
Afghan adult women even to this day. No woman appears
so westernized as to wear nothing on her head: Benazir
Bhutto herself covers her head while her eyes are shaded
by oversized glasses. Her English is fluent, while in
just one instance, she rouses the crowd to a fury in Urdu.
Otherwise she is soft-spoken, enjoying an enthusiastic,
massive following of men and women. Still, the military
are not entirely comfortable with taking orders from a
woman suggesting that a male surrogate be appointed, but
Benazir’s gender appears the least of her problems.
What made her hated in some circles was that in her first
term of office she lifted the veil metaphorically, even
more important than physically, by extending education
to young women and ushering in Western-style democracy
which she considered the best revenge against the unjust
hanging of her father by Zia, her military enemy.
Had Bhutto lived and won an expected
third term it would have been impossible for Sharia law
to be imposed on this still-unstable U.S. ally. The documentary
through historical footage and interviews with apparachiks
and journalists both Western and Eastern, captures the
importance of a nation that sits in a strategic area squeezed
between India and Afghanistan and the brilliance and idealism
of the title character. Let’s hope that the U.S.
is not going down the same erroneous path it trod when
it armed the mujahedeen against the Soviets in Afghanistan,
or now, when our country is funneling billions in foreign
aid to a Pakistan whose populace may not always be depended
on to fight the forces of Taliban within its borders.
Unrated. 111 minutes. © 2010 by
Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

Darren Aronofsky's
Black Swan
Opens Friday, December 3, 2010
Written By: Mark Heyman, Andrew
Heinz, John McLaughlin, from Andrew Heinz’s story
Starring: Natalie Portman, Mila Kunis, Vincent Cassel,
Barbara Hershey, Winona Ryder, Benjamin Millepied
Fox Searchlight Pictures
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
One scene in Darren Aronofsky's Black
Swan finds two dancers, Nina Sayers (Natalie Portman)
and Lily (Mila Kunia) chatting with a couple of young
yahoos about the performance they are about to give of
Tchaikovsky’s “Swan Lake”at New York’s
Lincoln Center. Predictably enough, the two good-looking
but vacant guys had never heard of it. You could probably
wager that the next day they’d be watching the Packers
or the Steelers on their sixty-inch TV, thinking that
ballet is kind of prissy. Football is the real deal, a
rough, tough game, not something for the ladies in tutus
who might spend their holidays playing badminton, netting
butterflies or hauling out their binoculars for some bird
watching. Who knew that the backstage politics of the
ballet theater could make Michael Vick quiver.
You learn quite a bit from watching
Black Swan, but the learning part is secondary
to the visceral. Black Swan is a Darren Aronofsky
project. If you’ve seen the director’s Pi
(a paranoid mathematician seeks a key number that will
unlock universal patterns found in nature) and Requiem
for a Dream (the drug addictions of four ambitious
people spin out of control), you know that the man is
not about to be hired to make anything for the Hallmark
Hall of Fame TV episodes. Aronofsky makes cinema, not
TV. His Black Swan effectively weaves genres
of horror, melodrama, classical music, dance, comedy,
eroticism, repression, neurosis, and psychosis so seamlessly
that—if you react in any way as I did—he will
shake you to the core.
It doesn’t hurt that he has brought
forth a performance to die for from Natalie Portman, already
an accomplished dancer, one who has studied for ten months
to deliver an effective performance for the key scenes
shown in the Tchaikovsky ballet.
Using a script by Mark Heyman, Andrew
Heinz and John McLaughlin from Andrew Heinz’s story
and, of course, with Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky’s
familiar music, director Aronofsky sets up several conflicts.
One is between Beth MacIntyre (Winona Ryder), who has
become too old for the key role and is being retired,
and Nina, who seeks the key role. Another is between Nina
and Lila, both competing for the lead. Still a third involves
Nina and her mother, Erica Sayers (Barbara Hershey), the
latter laying a guilt trip on her daughter for having
been forced to give up her own career in the dance after
becoming pregnant with Nina. But by far the largest conflict
is between Nina and Nina: in fact Thomas Leroy (Vincent
Cassel), the director of the company, has already told
Nina that she is her own worst enemy. You see, Nina, still
living with her mother despite having a job with a prestigious
New York ballet company, is a neurotic perfectionist,
at times borderline psychotic: a virgin who is sexually
repressed and whose frigidity works mightily against her
ability to portray a highly emotional, evil Black Swan.
There is no romance in the conventional
sense in Black Swan, save for the scenes from
the ballet. But there are ample shots of pure horror coming
from the Nina’s vivid hallucinations such as her
projections of grotesque characters and body doubles,
and scenes that evoke the disintegration of the soul exhibited
physically by Nina’s picking of the skin of her
shoulders and her fingers. The masturbation scene and
one of Sapphic love have guaranteed the picture its R
rating if nothing else does, two elements that will doubtless
add to an audience that just might be turned away thinking
that it’s primarily about the ballet.
Portman for a Best Actress nomination?
Why not? Aronofsky for Director? Could well be.
Rated R. 108 minutes. © 2010
by Harvey Karten

Steve Antin's
Burlesque
Opens Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Written By: Steve Antin
Cast: Cher, Christina Aguilera, Kristen Bell, Stanley
Tucci, Peter Gallagher, Alan Cumming, Cam Gigandet, Julianne
Hough, Eric Dane,
Screen Gems
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Burlesque is this year’s movie answer to
Rob Marshall’s 2002 film Chicago, to Bill
Condon’s 2006 movie Dreamgirls, and to
Rob Marshall’s film, Nine. Burlesque
is additional evidence that you don’t have to pay
Broadway prices to see razzle-dazzle musicals. Remember:
even if you’re sitting in the $120 seats on The
Great White Way, you could be watching the equivalent
of TV. Unless you’re around fifth row center, you
could be paying top price for row R seat 29, where you’ll
see only half the stage or be obstructed by a pole. Watch
a show on the big screen and it matters not where you’re
sitting. You’ll see everything loud and clear.
Then again, Burlesque is no
Chicago or Nine for a couple of reasons:
The first is that it lacks the complexity of plot that
made the other two independent of music for quality; the
second is that the music and song of Nine and
Chicago had variety rather than being for the most part
a one-note, mostly shrill affair. Nonetheless, to paraphrase
the most notable comment that President Obama made about
Secretary of State Clinton during the campaign, Burlesque
is entertaining enough.
Despite having not a single song that
remains in memory an hour after the show is over, this
is Christina Aguilera’s show. Like Peggy Sawyer
in 42nd Street,one of the great musicals of all
time, Ali (Christina Aguilera), like so many small town
gals (in her case from Iowa), asks how much for a ticket
to L.A. She responds to the clerk’s question, “One
way or round trip?” with “You must be kidding!”
Impressed by the eye candy at the Burlesque Lounge on
Sunset Boulevard, especially by co-owner Tess (Cher) whose
“Welcome to Burlesque” is backed up by a sensational
chorus line, she ignores the usual “Leave us your
name” and has the chutzpa to grab a tray from Jack
(Cam Gigandet), the bartender, hiring herself as a waitress
to get her foot in the door.
Demanding to be seen on the stage, she
impresses both Tess and the club’s gay costume designer,
Sean (Stanley Tucci), gets hired to the rage of a jealous
leading woman, Nikki (Kristen Bell), not realizing that
the club faces bankruptcy. Tess’s ex-husband, Vince
(Peter Gallagher) urges Tess to sell the club to real
estate magnate Marcus (Eric Dane), but Tess loves the
place and refuses to sell, pinning her hopes on the remarkable
new star, Ali, who is now sharing digs with the (straight)
bartender—who is in turn engaged to a woman spending
most of her time away in New York.
If the plot sounds superficial and old-hat,
it certainly is. And if the tentative romance between
Ali and Jack looks as though it will bear fruit, or the
club sounds as though it might get saved, stay tuned.
The songs are booming, the costumes and make-up look like
shoo-ins for awards. This is Aguilera’s first exposure
in a feature film: she has a solid résumé
of TV appearances. Cher appears throughout with an audience-pleasing
song toward the conclusion, with a fireworks finale that
doesn’t quite bring down the house. Chalk this up
to a solid effort at camp, a songfest without much plot,
a costume-cum-makeup affair that will please audiences
well beyond the major gay-targeted community.
Rated PG-13. 116 minutes. © 2010
by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

George Hickenlooper’s
Casino Jack
Opens Friday, December 17th
Reviewed by Alejandra Serret
Casino Jack tells the true
story of infamous lobbyist Jack Abramoff and of his con-artist
antics that resulted in one of the biggest scandals of
the Bush Administration. On January 3, 2006 Ambramoff
plead guilty to three felony counts: conspiracy, fraud,
and tax evasion. At the outset, this tale of greed, corruption,
and struggle for power is one we’ve seen before,
but Director George Hickenlooper (most known for Factory
Girl and The Man from Elysian Fields) approaches
it in a fresh way, exposing all of its complexities and
humanizing Ambramoff while damning him.
During Abramoff’s six year sentence,
Hickenlooper met with him six times and had approximately
thirty hours of interview time. All of this research allowed
Hickenlooper to get inside Abramoff’s head and to
tell his story from an interesting perspective. We see
that he is ambitious and driven and how this turns to
greed and corruption. We see that he is a family man,
a father, someone who supports his community, while also
being manipulative, callous, and villainous. Very few
actors could have mastered this role, but Kevin Spacey
gives it such nuance and depth. Not surprisingly, this
performance has earned him his sixth Golden Globe nomination.
Barry Pepper plays the role of Michael Scanlon (Abramoff’s
accomplice and partner in crime) and Kelly Preston of
Pam Abramoff. Both give strong performances.
Casino Jack opens with a dramatic
monologue delivered by Spacey with such passion and sarcasm
that it sets the tone from the beginning. What follows
is, the often hard to believe story, of Abramoff and Scanlon’s
corruption. From the defrauding of several Native American
tribes (who hired them to lobby on their behalf), to partnering
up with TV mattress king and small time crook to run a
floating casino (who then enlists the help of the mob
and puts a hit out on the previous casino owner), to trading
political favors for financial gain. Eventually (and how
were they able to get away with it for so long?) their
illegal antics catch up with them.
While Hickenlooper and Norman
Snider (screenwriter) adequately tackle the deciphering
of Abramoff’s operation, it is at times, hard to
follow. With so many cons going on at once, the intricacies
of each become convoluted. Where the movie is at its strongest
is in the balance of seriousness and humor. In a particularly
riveting scene, Spacey jumps up during his hearing and
rants to the men who are indicting him. One by one he
tears these powerful men down, accusing them of the same
crimes he is being punished for, and then you realize
it’s all happening in his head. And you start to
wonder if these thoughts can be trusted when coming from
a man who built a career on the art of manipulation. It’s
a fascinating story and well told by the director and
cast.

John Wells's
The Company Men
Opens Friday, December 10, 2010
The Weinstein
Company
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Written By: John Wells
Starring: Ben Affleck, Tommy Lee Jones, Chris Cooper,
Kevin Costner, Rosemarie De Witt, Maria Bello, Craig T.
Nelson
Is America headed for the toilet economically while China
is on a roll? Time will tell. The public is none too optimistic
if you go by the recent midterm elections that sent sixty
sitting members of the House packing and drove the Democratic
majority in the Senate from fifty-nine to fifty-one. The
recession is over. Tell that to the 9.6% of workers who
are unemployed and the 17% of workers who are either unemployed,
taking part-time jobs or not bothering to look any more.
So what does the American public do in early November
to show its disappointment with the Democratic administration
in the White House? It votes Republican, for the guys
who want to privatize Social Security, downsize Medicare,
send jobs overseas and maybe end the minimum wage. Smart
thinking.
The Company Men doesn’t
deal with macroeconomics, with national or international
politics. John Wells, who wrote and directs this feature
torn from today’s headlines, does something more
impressive. Wells hones in on a handful of highly paid
executives who are living the good life, the American
dream, driving the Porsches, sending their kids to private
schools, enjoying the corporate jets, enjoying the golf
club memberships, grilling the steaks in their backyard
barbecues, wearing the thousand-dollar threads, owning
their second homes in the Bahamas, relishing the conviviality
of conversations with their peers. There’s just
one problem. They think they own their jobs for life,
so they don’t save: in fact they go into debt with
the understanding that next year the bonuses will come
through, the salaries will climb, the stock options will
soar. What happens when through no fault of their own,
the general public become fearful, pull in their belts
a notch or two, stop spending to pay off their debts?
Company revenues are flat or worse, executives are laid
off, dominoes fall. In the company under John Wells’s
microscope, one top executive after another gets the axe.
The younger ones have some hope. Those who are old, and
old means over forty (and how many top executives are
under forty?), well, they’re in serious trouble.
Thus Wells turns his attention not to
the teeming millions who have recently lost their jobs
during the 2008 recession, but to the higher-ups, or at
least to those making six-figure and seven-figure incomes
in corporate suites, the suits who work for GTX, a manufacturing
conglomerate with 60,000 workers. Bobby Walker (Ben Affleck),
is head of sales and marketing, earning $160,000, enjoying
a Porsche, a loving wife Maggie (Rosemarie De Witt), and
a nice kid Eamonn (Danny Mills) who shoots hoops in the
back yard. The last thing he expects to get is the axe
when he reports to a meeting bragging about his latest
low score on the golf range where he has an expensive
membership. Gene McClary (Tommy Lee Jones), co-founder
of the company with James Salinger (Craig T. Nelson),
has put in decades of work with the company, now having
trouble raising its stock price and in talks for a prospective
merger which would threaten the employment of tens of
thousands, including most of those in the corporate suite.
Herein lies a major conflict over the ethical role of
the corporation. Salinger believes that the bottom line
should be the sole concern of companies. McClary considers
that ethically a company is responsible for the well-being
of its work force. An unspoken premise is this: Why should
the CEO have a yearly salary of $22 million and a corporate
jet while thousands of workers get laid off, losing their
homes, their families, their status? Among the creeps
painted as villains is Sally Wilcox (Maria Bello), head
of human resources and girlfriend of a married Gene McClary;
among the desperadoes, Phil Woodward (Chris Cooper), a
60-year-old who dyes his hair and is willing to take any
job. If you’re a betting man, you can wager which
of the laid-off fellows will be first to commit suicide.
The most interesting guy to watch is
Ben Affleck in the role of the 37-year-old Bobby Walker.
He takes his measly 12 weeks’ severance, goes to
the outsource course where the instructor fills the group
including a Ph.D. with pep talks, but after being beaten
back despite a promising interview, he takes a job as
a carpenter with his brother-in-law, Jack Dolan (Kevin
Costner).
Don’t expect The Company Men
to be as much fun as Up in the Air, last year’s
gem that allowed George Clooney to exude so much charm
that he actually made the people he fired feel almost
happy to go. One guy left his desk job thinking that he
could follow his dream to become a master chef! The
Company Men gives the audience a thorough understanding
of the mess we’re in. We leave the theater wondering
just how safe we are, after all, since somehow we in the
U.S. have been told that the dirtiest word in the English
language is “socialism.” No, we’re not
going to allow government to guarantee us a job, to grant
us a five-week’s vacation with pay, to require that
employees have a damn good reason to dump us as the French
government requires its bosses to do after a probationary
period. With unionisn down to just eight percent of the
work force in America, with teachers threatened with a
loss of tenure, it’s root, hog, or die. Let’s
hope that The Company Men provides a wake-up
call to anyone who is still too comatose to see where
our country is heading, but then, such folks may not be
ready for a picture as serious as this one.
Rated R. 113 minutes. © 2010 by
Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

Doug Liman's
Fair Game
Opens Friday, November 5, 2010
Written By: Jez Butterworth, John-Henry
Butterworth, based on Joseph Wilson’s The Politics
of Truth and Valerie Plame Wilson’s Fair
Game
Starring: Naomi Watts, Sean Penn, Sam Shepard, Ty Burrell,
Bruce McGill, Michael Kelly, Brooke Smith, David Denman
Summit Entertainment
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
A key scene in this political
thriller takes place in a taxi in Washington, DC. The
cabby, whose name is Joe, chats with Joseph Wilson (Sean
Penn), noting that he was brought up in Freetown, Sierra
Leone, a place awash in corruption. He praises the USA,
the country of his choosing, stating that we live in “the
land of the free and the home of the brave,” a land
which the cabby and third-grade students thinks is untainted.
Joe Wilson, who knows more than a third-grader, informs
the driver, “I wouldn’t be too sure of that.”
This is a truth that comes to most of
us, or at least to those who spend more time reading the
New York Times than sexting on a BlackBerry or watching
TV’s Entertainment Tonight show. Yes, to
be sure, we’re a great country, warts and all, but
it’s easier for literature, theater and movies to
entice a crowd when uncovering dirt than when waving the
flag. Doug Liman, the director of Fair Game, knows
this well. Liman, the director of The Bourne Identity,
is in his metiér with Fair Game. Though
amnesia is clearly not the problem faced by Wilson and
his wife, Valerie Plame Wilson (Naomi Watts). In fact
a little amnesia could have prevented the trouble that
came close to breaking their marriage apart.
One gets the idea that to put this movie
over at the box office, Liman and scripters Jez Butterworth
and John-Henry Butterworth decided to stress the family
drama even over the international politics surrounding
a scandal that erupted in 2002-03, a scandal that could
have toppled the government but instead let the perpetrators
off almost scot-free. Some background in the actual events
of those years would help to understand the film, particularly
given that the dialogue which unfolds as fast as the conversation
during the first five minutes of David Fincher’s
The Social Network. The film has a rah-rah conclusion,
made stunningly effective by a speech given to a group
of young people by Joe Wilson. Sean Penn, and actor known
for stories of his tirades against the paparazzi, is cast
as a man who is not willing to take crap sitting down.
Though more talky than many political
thrillers and with fewer literal explosions, Fair
Game takes us a few years back to 2002 when the Bush
administration was contemplating war with Iraq, or dare
I say, looking for an excuse to wage a war already decided
upon. The White House is told that Saddam Hussein is buying
substantial quantities of aluminum tubes of yellowcake
uranium from Niger, an African country rated by one group
as the world’s most unlivable place—but apparently
one rich in yellowcake. That and the correlated idea that
Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction became the
justification for shock-and-awe, the bombing of Baghdad,
a war that at least one adviser told President Bush would
be “a slam dunk.”
Joe Wilson, a former ambassador to Niger
(an appointment that would seem more like a punishment
than a reward for service), is an expert on West African
affairs charged with discovering the truth or falsity
of the yellowcake rumor. When he challenged the story
of the Niger sale on yellowcake in an op-ed piece in the
New York Times, stating that the sale never took place
and that thereby the war with Iraq was being fought under
false pretenses, the administration sought revenge by
going after Wilson’s wife, Valerie. A high-up official
informed the New York Times that Valerie Plame, an eighteen-year
veteran of the C.I.A., was a secret agent who disguises
her role by pretending to be a venture capitalist. Her
cover blown, she is summarily dismissed by the organization,
shunned by her friends, and on the receiving end of death
threats. Plame is determined to spend her life quietly
when the fuss blows over. Not so her husband, who seeks
to retaliate against the administration on talk shows
and on college campuses, seeking the culprit who exposed
his wife. Given the opposite temperaments of the couple,
the marriage heads for the rocks.
At times the film races by so swiftly
that important details that might have connected some
dots get lost, not unlike the condition of Valerie Plame’s
own book, Fair Game, which is filled with redacted
words and sentences, courtesy of the C.I.A. With performers
as agile as Penn and Watts, the electricity comes more
from the shouting of the couple and the fury with which
Joe goes against the administration than with the usual
conventions of the thriller such as car crashes, gun fights,
and explosions. Liman, who stands behind the camera when
not seated in the director’s chair, moves the lenses
swiftly. Editor Christopher Tellefsen rarely concentrates
long on a single stationary shot—a technique which,
while sometimes vertiginous, helps rivet the drama as
does John Powell’s thumping music. Side roles are
spot-on, particularly those of Bruce McGill as agent Jim
Pavitt, Noah Emmerich as Bill, a C.I.A. supervising officer,
and David Andrews as Scooter Libby, Dick Cheney's lackey
and the stooge who takes the fall for exposing Plame.
Technical credits are tops, giving the
look of an expensive film shot on location in Kuala Lumpur,
Amman, Baghdad, Cairo, and with the IBM building in White
Plains substituting for C.I.A. headquarters in Fairfax
County, Virginia.
Rated PG-13 104 minutes. ©
2010 by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

David O. Russell's
The Fighter
Opens Friday, December 10, 2010
Written By: Scott Silver, Paul Tamasy and Eric Johnson
Starring: Christian Bale, Mark Wahlberg, Amy Adams, Melissa
Leo
Paramount Pictures
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
This is probably the only film you’ll see outside
of outrageous satire that finds tough male prison inmates
clamoring to see an HBO documentary. The Fighter,
closely based on the true story of former welterweight
boxing champion Micky “Irish” Ward and executive
produced by The Wrestler director Darren Aronofsky,
spends a few exciting moments inside the ring, but director
David O. Russell is far more interested in showing us
what goes on inside what might be considered the typical
working-class families of those who take up the pugilistic
sport of boxing.
Mark Wahlberg, in terrific shape as
the title character, Micky Ward, and Christian Bale as
Dicky (his crack-addicted, gaunt half-brother), share
a rocky upbringing in Lowell, Massachusetts under domineering
mother Alice (Melissa Leo), whose brood of nine includes
a stable of young women who, when lined up on the sofa
look as though they’re waiting for customers in
a brothel. Though Wahlberg’s Micky Ward lucks out
not only by gaining a shot at a title bout in London but
also by becoming the steady of Charlene (played by Amy
Adams, arguably the cutest young woman in Hollywood),
the more challenging and dramatic role belongs to Dicky,
who serves as Micky’s idol and mentor but whose
drug addiction causes Micky’s girlfriend, mother,
sisters, and just about anyone else with an interest in
Micky’s career to want Dicky out of the picture.
The opening segments of the movie belong
to Bale, almost unrecognizable with sunken cheeks and
crackhead teeth as he saunters down the blocks of the
town of Lowell promoting himself to the locals as the
man ready for a comeback. He cites his knockdown of Sugar
Ray Leonard—who, some believe had merely tripped—but
now, at the age of 40 with a pronounced bald spot is over-the-hill
for any dimension save as his half-brother’s trainer.
Most of the humor is physical. There is one gem of verbal
humor: when Micky takes Charlene to a movie, to La
Belle Epoque, of all choices, he falls asleep, head
back, likely snoring. On the way out, she sniffs, “Why
did you take me to that show? All I did was read!”
The two strong women are Charlene, a
college dropout who has worked a number or bars and who
is in her main man’s corner even to the extent of
challenging his half-brother’s influence; and Alice,
a mother whose maternal instinct is purely cartoonish
working-class though one may wonder whether her autocratic
manner might be the only way to keep discipline over a
household of harpies.
The film is being pushed for awards,
though The Fighter is as conventional as its
producer Darren Aronofsky’s The Wrestler is
quirky.
Rated R. 115 minutes. © 2010 by
Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

Robert Letterman's
Gulliver's Travels
Opens Friday, December 24, 2010
Written By: Joe Stillman, Nicholas
Stoller
Starring: Jack Black, Jason Segel, Emily Blunt, Amanda
Peet, Billy Connolly
20th Century Fox
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Don’t look for Menippean
satire in this kid-friendly version of the great classic
of 1735, the kind of biting wit that Jonathan Swift used
to attack mental attitudes rather than specific individuals.
Swift, whose A Modest Proposal suggested (ironically,
of course), that the impoverished Irish could alleviate
their condition by selling their children for food to
the rich, took aim against the corruption of European
governments, examined whether humankind is by nature corrupt
or is made corrupt by institutions, and peered into the
pettiness of religious institutions. All this is shaved
away by director Robert Letterman in a brief, 85-minute
classic-comic version depending on the slapstick abilities
of Jack Black in the title role of Lemuel Gulliver.
Strange to say, the opening segment
is the funniest, the part that represents a smidgen of
reality. Jack Black plays the role of a loser, Lemuel
Gulliver, employed in the mail room of a Manhattan magazine
nursing a crush on Darcy Silverman (Amanda Peet), its
travel editor. He is so little thought of that a guy he
hires as his assistant is promoted the next day as his
boss, and thinks so little of himself that he is afraid
to ask Darcy out on a date. Launching the first of a set
of lies—that he is a world traveler—he plagiarizes
articles from Frommer on Oaxaca and a few from Time Out,
impressing Darcy enough to send him on a trip to Bermuda
where, falling into the Bermuda Triangle he lands in an
alternative universe of Lilliliput. He is bound and held
captive by little people under King Theodore (Billy Connolly),
but actually ruled by villainous General Edward (Chris
O’Dowd). Edward is betrothed to Princess Mary (Emily
Blunt), courting her daily at the official courting hour,
but Horatio (Jason Segel), a commoner in the dungeon for
daring to pronounce his love for her, is freed by the
good will of Gulliver who becomes what he had been unable
to become in his own world - a genuine hero. Gulliver,
a Mutt in a land of Jeffs, takes on Lilliput’s rivals,
is soon featured on all billboards, even playing Cyrano
to allow Horatio to say all the right romantic things
to his beloved.
Billy Connolly, one of the great comedians
of the screen, is sadly underutilized as his little people’s
monarch. Nor does Emily Blunt, another comic gem, get
to strut much of her stuff. But Jack Black, though not
given as good a script as he had with his best role as
Sid in Tim Robbins’s Cradle Will Rock, is (surprise!)
Jack Black, and when he drops his shorts to urinate on
a fire, that’s not contemporary sleaze: it’s
in Jonathan Swift’s classic as well.
The 3D does not call undue attention
to itself, illuminating Lilliput especially allowing photographer
David Tattersall’s long shots to keep the gigantic
Black from charging right out of the screen. Gulliver’s
Travels may not tell us a thing about petty differences
in religion and zilch about corruption in Europe, but
it’s a decent entertainment despite its Jack Blackian
predictability.
Rated PG. 85 minutes. © 2010 by
Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

John Irvin's
Hemingway's Garden of Eden
Opens Friday, December 10, 2010
Roadside Attractions
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Written By: James Scott Linville from Ernest Hemingway’s
short novel
Starring: Jack Huston, Mena Suvari, Richard E. Grant,
Caterina Murino, Carmen Maura, Matthew Modine
We in the U.S. know Ernest Hemingway
as not only one of our finest writers but a macho guy
whom we introduce to high-school kids to show that writers
are not all a prissy bunch wed to solitary rooms pecking
away at typewriters and computers. Hemingway was not only
a womanizer and a fan of bullfighting (the latter to his
discredit, however) but an adventurer who joined his father,
a big-game hunter in Africa; an ambulance driver during
World War I; a reporter during the Spanish Civil War;
a heavy drinker; and that’s just for starters.
Yet watching him during his twenties in this semi-autobiographical
dramatization of his first marriage, you’ve got
to wonder. How come he’s such a wimp, wrapped around
the little finger of a beautiful but neurotic woman, catering
to her because she’s filthy rich? She plays sexual
games, perhaps testing his love for her, or maybe just
awash with the boredom of the people in the wealthiest
upper one percent of the population. We’re back
in the 1920s, before the Great Depression (that’s
the first one, not the one that started in 2008), the
jazz age, when David Bourne (Jack Huston), living as an
American expatriate in Paris, meets and marries Catherine
Bourne (Mena Suvari) after a whirlwind romance. She buys
him a car, and they’re off on an extended honeymoon
in Europe, covering Cannes, Paris, Madrid and surrounding
areas while we in the audience are made privy to areas
in Africa that are recalled by David from his childhood
experiences with his big-game hunting father (Matthew
Modine).
Ashley Rowe, who serves as director John Irvin’s
photographer, films the action in various locations in
Spain to stand in for France and also in Amboseli National
Park in Maasi land in Kenya to reflect David’s childhood
memories. The script by James Scott Linville, adapted
from Hemingway’s novel, is largely wooden and pretentious,
not particularly credible even considering how neurotic
Catherine Bourne turns out to be. We can understand the
need that Catherine has for diversion since, after all,
she has never had to work, has no professional challenges
in her life except for the erotic one that forms the spine
of this film. The sexual game she plays is to introduce
the beautiful Marita (Caterina Murino) into the villa
owned by Madame Aurol (Carmen Maura), turning that bi-sexual
woman into a ménage-a-trois, though we’re
not sure whether Catherine is testing her husband’s
devotion to the marriage or simply enjoying a game without
worrying extensively whether the marriage will survive
the months of honeymoon.
From the beginning of the film, the
authentic period feel of the drama is enjoyable. The car,
which looks something never before seen (it’s nothing
like the Model-T Ford), the re-creation of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s
party scene at least in miniature, is involving. As the
erotic play continues, the plot becomes wearisome, David’s
passivity, particularly when harassed by his wife’s
insistence that he stop writing and join her in holiday
fun. makes one want to shake him up. And you can’t
be blamed for wanting to throw both Catherine and Marita
into the Mediterranean. Then again, maybe that’s
what the director wants us to feel.
In any case society would be better
off if more people were like this early Hemingway dude
and everyone sat at the typewriter and refused to attend
those god-awful bullfights.
Not Yet Rated. 111 minutes.
© 2010 by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

Tom Hooper's
The King's Speech
Opens Friday, November 26, 2010
Written By: David Seidler
Starring: Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush, Helena Bonham Carter,
Guy Pearce, Timothy Spall, Derek Jacobi, Claire Bloom,
Michael Gambon
The Weinstein Company
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Attention must be paid, as Mrs.
Willy Loman would say, to a movie whose climactic scene—the
one that has the audience at the edge of their seats with
bated breath—involves a stationary man behind a
microphone who, we pray, will deliver a talk without stammering.
Everything that has happened during this splendid two-hour
drama in which everyone speaks the language of Milton
and Shakespeare, leads up to those thrilling moments.
The King’s Speech, blessed by David Seidler’s
intelligent but never toffee-nosed script, benefits from
its delivery by its two principal performers, Colin Firth
and Geoffrey Rush, who play a proper Englishman and an
Australian respectively. Firth assumies the roles of Prince
Albert (later King George VI) and Rush the far more casual
role of a failed actor who becomes a successful elocution
teacher.
One might find a precedent in George
Bernard Shaw’s play Pygmalion, turned into
the musical My Fair Lady, which posits a romance
of sorts between speech professor Henry Higgins and reluctant
pupil Eliza Doolittle, but the only romance in The
King’s Speech is with our remarkable language,
spoken by the entire cast with the beauty we rarely hear
in the movies. There’s but one exception to this
fluent delivery: the King has a stammer that makes him
wonder whether he can execute one of the main requirements
of his office - rallying the people during a time of war
with the fervor and charisma that—given the non-existence
of television at the time—only the human voice through
a microphone can bring.
Granted, the movie could be criticized
as being merely a photographed play, since not many scenes
are shot outdoors. Most of the action takes place within
the walls of the palace and in the shabby rooms of the
teacher. Yet, given the regal costumes, the parade of
staff and officials sucking up to royalty, The King’s
Speech transcends this limitation.
From the time he was four years old,
the man who because King George VI (Colin Firth) was afflicted
with a stammer. When trying to utter a sentence, he would
hesitate before some words, sometimes in the beginning
of a sentence, occasionally in the middle. He would not
repeat a letter like P-P-P-P-Porky P-P-P-Pig, but his
hesitations could prove deadly as the head of state for
the British Empire, which even as late as 1936 covered
a large portion of the globe. Supported by his wife, who
became Queen Elizabeth (Helena Bonham Carter), he failed
at therapy with a doctor who filled his mouth with ice
cubes and got even worse when his father, George V (Michael
Gambon), yelled at him to get over his affliction. After
being pushed by his wife to try a course of study with
one Lionel Logue (Geoffrey Rush), a man who later became
his best friend for the remainder of his life, he entertained
the love-hate relationship of Higgins and Doolittle, Helen
Keller and Anne Sullivan, and no small number of reluctant
kids and their history teachers. Logue insisted on tutoring
His Royal Highness in his own modest flat, on calling
him by his nickname, Bertie. After a number of sessions
in which Prince Albert stormed out red-faced with anger,
the student learned to overcome his flaw by singing the
words, by cursing (thereby earning the picture’s
R rating), and by coming to terms with the psychological
roots of his dilemma (demanding father, teasing brother).
Side roles are aces. Derek Jacobi as
Archbishop Cosmo Lang, who looked down his nose at the
commoner therapist, Guy Pearce as King Edward VIII who
gave up his throne to marry the twice-divorced Baltimorean
Wallis Simpson (Eve Best), Michael Gambon as the ailing
King George V, and Claire Bloom as the aging Queen Mary.
What idiot said that British history is just a bunch of
boring names of kings and dates?
Rated R. 118 minutes. © 2010
by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online
Paul Weitz's
Little Fockers
Opens December 22, 2010
:
Written By: Larry Stuckey, John
Hamburg, Victoria Strouse
Starring: Robert De Niro, Ben Stiller, Owen Wilson, Blythe
Danner, Jessica Alba, Laura Dern, Harvey Keitel, Teri
Polo, Barbra Streisand
Universal Pictures
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
The test of wills that defines the Focker
series of movies has never been able to surpass or equal
the first of the series when director Jay Roach introduced
the audience to the comedy in Meet the Parents.
Now, using many of the same stars that were present in
that hilarious entry, Paul Weitz keeps Larry Stuckey,
John Hamburg and Victoria Strouse’s script running
at a swift pace with nary a moment’s rest, but this
zaniness serves only as an attempt to distract us from
the staleness of the humor, the cheapness of the jests,
the absurd falsity of one of its premises as well as the
strange motivation of one of its principal (and beautiful)
characters.
The movie is named for a pair of twins,
Henry and Samantha Focker (Colin Baiocchi and Daisy Tahan),
not quite the adorable kids we’re accustomed to
on the screen. The boy is lactose intolerant (we know
because he pukes up a spoonful of lasagna onto his dad’s
face, ha ha) and the girl refuses to speak to her old
man. The central premise is that Jack Byrnes (Robert De
Niro), who is the father of Pamela Byrnes-Focker (Teri
Polo) and father-in-law of Greg Focker (Ben Stiller),
has a heart condition and needs someone to become the
family leader when he is no longer with us. Virtually
certain that Greg is too weak for the role, Jack toys
with the idea of subverting his daughter’s marriage
and substituting her ex, Kevin Rawley (Owen Wilson), a
rich investment banker. His suspicions seem to ring true
when, spying on Greg, he appears to catch the younger
man in a sexual embrace with Andi Garcia (Jessica Alba),
a gorgeous marketer of a drug for erectile dysfunction,
who beyond any stretch of imagination wants Greg to act
as chief spokesperson for the drug.
The drug Suspengo, which in every way
acts like Cialis, results in considerable embarrassment
for Jack Byrnes. In the movie’s one solid moment
of successful physical humor, we watch as Greg gets on
the better side of his dad-in-law by rescuing him from
a situation which otherwise would have resulted in a trip
to the hospital. But how to explain that Andi Garcia,
getting Greg alone, deliberately swallows a Suspengo tablet,
which turns her on, then boldly attacks the man sexually?
First, a Cialis-type drug does nothing for the libido.
Second, if Greg does not turn her on without the drug,
why would she want him at all?
The movie can hardly be saved by Dustin
Hoffman in the role of Greg’s dad, Bernie, who is
taking flamenco lessons in Seville; by Barbra Streisand
as Greg’s mom, Rozalin, whose TV show is all about
sex and may be inspired by the career of Ruth Westheimer;
or by Laura Dern as the headmistress of a posh, progressive
school for which the twins are being interviewed. Some
class is provided, however, by Blythe Danner as Dina Bynes,
who would never in real life survive a year of marriage
to someone like Jack Byrnes. Obligatory, tasteless Jewish
jokes conclude the show.
Rated PG-13 98 minutes. ©2010
by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

Roger Michell's
Morning Glory
Opens November 10, 2010
Written By: Aline Brosh McKenna
Starring: Rachel McAdams, Harrison Ford, Diane Keaton,
Patrick Wilson, Jeff Goldblum
Paramount Pictures
Reviewed for New York Review by Harvey Karten
Aside from being an almost laughter-free
albeit chuckle-worthy comedy, Morning Glory has
an ironic ending attached to its overlong pabulum plot.
While appearing to glorify an anchorman’s dream
of returning a fluffy morning entertainment show to a
serious new format, Morning Glory subverts the
fantasy by having the anchorman undercut himself, making
him his own worst enemy. That’s not the most serious
fault: the movie’s flaws lie primarily in its overly
caffeinated characters, making one wonder about this:
if the voters of California have just rejected legalization
of marijuana, perhaps the people of New York State have
made the possession and sale of methamphetamine lawful.
Though Jeff Goldblum and Harrison Ford come across as
the only lead actors who speak in an intelligible manner
with enough pauses to realize that their partners will
not interrupt, such an icon of the film industry like
Diane Keaton and youthful presence such as Rachel McAdams
act so hyper that we wonder what they’re on.
Morning Glory looks like a
parody of a number of morning TV shows, anything from
quiz shows like Meredith Vieira’s Millionaire
to Martha Stewart’s Living to the fluff
on The Today Show, but the backstage dialogue
consisting of gruff bickering between Harrison Ford’s
character Mike Pomeroy and Rachel McAdams’s perpetual
motion persona Becky Fuller is interminable and grating,
while Diane Keaton’s anchorwoman, Colleen Peck turns
in an embarassing performance, particularly when trying
to compete in a hip-hop exhibition with 50 Cent, who performs
as himself. Nor is there the slightest spark of credibility
in a romance between Patrick Wilson’s Adam Bennett
and Becky Fuller, as though Becky would have more than
a moment even to remove her pants (she does, but barely).
Director Roger Michell created better
work with Notting Hill, the film story that asked
whether the world’s most famous film star could
fall in love with the owner of a book shop. But then,
Notting Hill was not a sitcom, and the performers
did not take speed or drink ten cups of coffee daily.
In the side roles Matt Malloy does fine
work as a weatherman until he has to sit in a roller coaster
to boost ratings at which point he acts like an idiot,
and John Pankow is given considerable time onscreen as
an adviser to the freshman producer. As a normal person
Pankow’s Lenny Bergman does not act outrageous,
which seems too much to ask of most of the others.
Rated PG-13. 110 minutes. © 2010
by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

Paul Haggis's
The Next Three Days
Opens Friday, November 19, 2010
Written By: Paul Haggis from the
film Anything for Her (Pour elle) by
Fred Cavayé, written by Fred Cavayé, Guillaume
Lemans
Cast: Russell Crowe, Elizabeth Banks, Liam Neeson, Brian
Dennehy
Paul Haggis
Lionsgate
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
When a loved one is imprisoned for life, whether you think
that person guilty or not, you might decide to take radical
action to get him or her out of jail. You can go the route
that Betty Anne Waters utilized to get her husband, Kenny,
out of prison in Tony Goldwyn’s Conviction.
Rather than do the normal thing and hire a lawyer, Betty
Anne, who had barely a high-school education, put herself
through college and then law school, without even a thought
of practicing the legal trade except for a single case:
to go through the appeals process which she believes would
get her man released after nineteen years behind bars.
Whew! That’s the patience of a saint. Then there’s
the method that John Brennan (Russell Crowe) chose. John
is a college teacher (OK community college), whose lawyer
has been unable to do much for his wife Lara (Elizabeth
Banks), who is accused and convicted of the murder of
her boss—by a blow to the latter’s head with
a fire extinguisher (ouch). This looked like an open-and-shut
case: Lara had a grudge against her superior, her fingerprints
were found on the murder weapon, and the victim’s
blood was on her coat. What jury could resist? John cared
not a whit whether she was guilty. Their seven-year-old
son Luke (Ty Simpkins) may not have much of a personality,
but the boy was their blood, thicker than water, and a
boy needs a mom, so it looks like jailbreak is the order
of the day.
Some people, mainly critics, have a
problem with the film's plot holes. It just doesn’t
seem right to them that a guy can thumb his nose at the
authorities at innumerable check points; that he could
frustrate the local police, the FBI, Interpol, Homeland
Security, and who knows what else. But for me that’s
no problem. It’s a movie, and we expect people we
sympathize with to do more than CPA’s and fifth-grade
teachers to get over the usual frustrating barriers to
self-expression, and that’s exactly what John is
planning to do.
Russell Crowe, in virtually every scene,
whether battered or clean-faced (with a two-day beard,
of course), has women lusting for him, as one Erit (Moran
Atías) does in the opening scene, a humorous one
and one of the best in the movie. While John and Lara
are dining together with Mick Brennan (Michael Buie) and
Erit, Erit launches some obvious double entendre, stating
that she would have no problem working “under”
John. Lara demonstrates her temper—and therefore
her capacity to commit murder, presumably—by going
ballistic, disgusted that her friend could hit on her
husband in public. End of dinner.
Later, when police break into John and
Lara’s home, arresting Lara for the murder of Lara’s
boss, Lara is apparently sentenced to jail for life, though
we in the audience see nothing of the trial. Appeals fail;
we are told that the U.S. Supreme Court has not heard
an appeal of a murder case for the past thirty years.
The obvious solution? John must sacrifice his job at the
local Pittsburgh community college to break his wife out
of jail without her permission, using the occasion of
her transport to the hospital for insulin shock. To prepare
for the jailbreak he goes underground, consulting Damon
Pennington (Liam Nesson), an expert on jailbreaks since
he had done just that himself (though one wonders why
Pennington was consulted since he had given himself up
as a man tired of running); he gets beaten to a pulp trying
to get false passports, a fake driver’s license
and social security i.d.’s; he invades a meth-house,
hearing that the place has bags full of money, at which
point two people die. He fends off a hit from another
woman. He deals with parents who do not entirely approve
of him.
The film is a remake of Fred Cavayé’s
Anything for Her, which starred Diane Kruger,
made in 2008. Nobody apparently saw the French work, which
came across in only ninety-six minutes, but which has
been bloated into one hundred thirty-six in this American
version.
Paul Haggis has done more convincing
work with Crash, a complex Los Angeles drama
interweaving diverse stories; and with In the Valley
of Elah (a retired military investigator works with
a police detective to uncover the truth behind his son’s
disappearance following his return from a tour of duty
in Iraq). Still, Haggis gets good performances from Crowe
and Banks (the latter changing hair color from blonde
to brunette to red. The movie is good enough to attract
both a blockbuster audience and fans of Mr. Crowe.
Rated PG-13. 133 minutes. © 2010 by Harvey Karten
Member: NY Film Critics Online

Rachid Bouchareb's
Outside The Law (Hors-la-loi)
Opens Friday, November 5, 2010
Written By: Rachid Bouchareb
Starring:: Jamel Debouze, Roschdy Zem, Bernard Blancan,
Sami Bouajila, Thibault de Montalembert, Samir Guesmi,
Sabrina Seyvesou
Studio Canal
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
Director/scripter Rachid Bouchareb's
Outside the Law tell the story of the Algerian
nationalists who rebelled against the French government,
resulting in Algeria's independence in 1962. The film
illustrates the hoary expression, “one man’s
terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.”
An audience, even one of Europeans and Americans, could
not today be blamed for rooting for the Algerians fighting
to free their country from French colonialism. But the
very people who cheer the the film's “freedom fighters”
would charecterize such an uprizing as terroristic if
it occured today.
This is not to say that the violence
inflicted by the Algerian nationalists was justified,
or that the end justified the means. But ideas aside,
Outside the Law is far from a dull history lesson.
If parts of the film employ stiff dialogue, that’s
all in the service of educating an audience that may not
know much about the events. For example, in the opening
scene, an Algerian family in 1925 is thrown off its land
in favor of a French settler, the head of household telling
the police, “I’ve lived here always. My ancestors
lived here. How can I feed my family if I am forced off
the land?”
Bouchareb provides plenty of visceral
excitement that will remind the audience of police dramas
like Bonnie and Clyde but which will be compared
by those hip to history with Gillo Pontecorvo’s
1966 masterwork The Battle of Algiers. Virtually
all of Bouchareb’s film, though, take place in Paris,
as the war for Algerian Independence was fought not only
in the colonies but in the home country as well.
No sooner had the French been tossed
out of Indochina in 1954—with quite a few Algerians
fighting on the French side—than they now had to
contend with the potential loss of another colony. So
sensitive are the French even today about those defeats
that, word is, when Outside the Law was shown
at the Palais during the Cannes Festival, the French posted
gendarmes around the theater for fear of a riot by French,
who don’t want to be reminded of the tragic events.
In Bouchareb’s tale, an Arab family
is thrown off their ancestral land in the wide open Algerian
spaces in 1925 because the law allowed French settlers
to take possession. Three brothers from the family, Saïd
(Jamel Debouze), Messaoud (Roschdy Zem), and Abdelkader
(Sami Bouajila) work out their relationships with the
colonial power in their own ways. Saïd is interested
mostly in money. He hangs around the Place Pigalle, pimps
some women, runs a prospering casino and manages an Algerian
fighter whom he wants to set up in a heavyweight title
bout with a Frenchman. (By Frenchman I’m referring
throughout as non-Muslim French). He smokes cigars and
drinks, both violations of the code of the FLN, the Algerian
National Liberation Front. By contrast Messaoud and Abdelkader,
the latter more than the former, are bent on violence
to wear down the morale of the French, the shootings and
explosions to take place in France rather than Algeria.
Struggling against the FLN are the army and police, the
local police force being led by Colonel Faivre (Bernard
Blancan), an officer in France’s war with Indochina
and now a top detective.
While women play a passive role for
the most part, one blonde is in love with Messaoud and
joins the FLN cause, while an Algerian woman is married
off to Messaoud but has nothing to say. Christophe Beaucarne’s
camera is spot-on, taking in the action without resorting
to the hackneyed use of grainy cinema-verité treatment.
The film earns its 138 minutes’
length, the time passing swiftly given director Bouhareb’s
view to give the audience a lavish, cinematic treatment
of a period in French and Algerian history probably unknown
for the most part outside those countries and not at all
by those born after the war for independence. As a former
teacher of Social Studies, I’m thinking: Wouldn’t
it be grand if European history teachers could use both
historical fiction and cinematic treatments like this
to bring history to life? Outside the Law is
Algeria's entry into the Oscar competition for best foreign
movie of 2010.
Unrated. 138 minutes. © 2010
by Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

John Cameron Mitchell's
Rabbit Hole
Opens December 17, 2010
Written By: David Lindsay-Abaire
from his play
Starring: Nicole Kidman, Aaron Eckhart, Dianne Wiest,
Miles Teller, Tammy Blanchard, Sandra Oh, Giancarlo Esposito,
Jon Tenney
Lionsgate
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
I would like ten bucks for every couple whose otherwise
happy marriage broke up because of the death of their
young children. Recently in my Brooklyn building alone,
one such family was torn apart when their fourteen-year-old
daughter passed on after suffering from leukemia for years.
The father moved to Manhattan, the mother to somewhere
in Queens. This seemed puzzling: wouldn’t a catastrophic
event like this, arguably the most stressful one that
could occur to any person or couple, cement a family together?
For a further understanding of the phenomenon—and
an answer to my question—you can’t go wrong
by looking into John Cameron Mitchell’s film Rabbit
Hole. The film is scripted by David Lindsay-Abarie
from his Pulitzer-prize winning play, which garnered a
Tony for Cynthia Nixon for Best Performance by a Leading
Actress in a Drama. Rabbit Hole, a film which
includes moments of humor and melodrama, proceeds for
the most part as a straight narrative that focuses primarily
on the ways that dad and mom think in different ways about
the four-year-old child they lost as a result of a car
accident eight months previously.
With Aaron Eckhart as Howie and Nicole
Kidman in the Cynthia Nixon role as Becca, director John
Cameron Mitchell takes us to a (pun unintended) drop-dead
home purportedly in a Yonkers ‘burb situated right
by a lake where Howie earns an excellent living doing
something we don’t know about while Becca stays
home for the most part using an exercise machine when
she’s not warding off dinner invitations from her
next-door neighbor or, in one case, sneaking off to Manhattan
to look up some old friends. As Becca, Kidman, who looks
frumpy in some scenes, dashing in others, even like a
teenager in a few (imagination running wild), takes the
view of “no sex please, we’re grieving,”
but that’s not her real motive. Becca wants to start
afresh, to forget the disaster of eight months previous,
to sell the house they love, to move on, and while the
husband does not yet have a clue, he may be on his way
to the dumpster. By contrast, Howie grieves: he and Becca
join a therapy group which he will continue to attend
though Becca has had it after one session (in one of the
movie’s humorous moments, a group member notes that
her daughter died because God wanted another angel, to
which Becca replies, snapping her finger, “Why can’t
God just create another angel, just like that! After all!
He’s God!”) Howie holds on to the child seat
in the car. He cherishes a video of Danny, their four-year-old.
He keeps the teddy bears in the child’s room. He
wants another baby. In other words, he sounds like the
psychologically healthier person.
Performing in a supportive, supporting
role, Dianne Wiest has sage counsel as Nat, Becca’s
mom, while Izzy (Tammy Blanchard), who is Becca’s
immature, heroin-addicted and pregnant sister in a relationship
with Auggie (a thinly sketched Giancarlo Esposito), has
a role that should have been deleted. One wonders whether
the play even bothered with them. A mysterious relationship
develops between Becca and a high-school senior, Rick
(Jon Tenney), a bond which should not be given away by
critics but probably will, thereby ruining part of the
drama for those who read reviews in advance.
Aaron Eckhart was born for satire. He’s
terrific in anything by Neil LaBute (In the Company
of Men, Your Friends & Neighbors) and
astonishing as part of a three-part Mod Squad in one of
the great satires of modern times, Jason Reitman’s
Thank You for Smoking. He’s fine in the
role of a husband whose view of fatherhood and husbanding
contrasts with those of his wife’s, but the script
is missing the edge of these previous films. Nicole Kidman
has the gravitas for this role, perhaps more than Cynthia
Nixon notwithstanding the latter’s Tony-award performance
in the stage play. All in all, less than shattering, more
than just interesting.
Rated R. 91 minutes. © 2010 by
Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online

Patrick Hughes'
Red Hill
Opens Friday, November 5, 2010
Written By: Patrick Hughes
Starring: Ryan Kwanten, Steve Bisley, Tom E. Lewis, Claire
Van Der Boom
Strand Releasing/ Arclight Films
Reviewed for New York Cool by Harvey Karten
It’s no secret that we all
harbor revenge fantasies. Your mother refused to get you
that puppy, your dad did not take you to a hooker when
you were 15. Your girlfriend dumped you for the neurologist
with the Beemer, etc. etc. If we can’t get revenge
on any of these villains, we’ll bully someone else.
If we can’t take it out on someone else, we’ll
go to movies that feature victims getting back with the
perps who did them wrong. And wrong they did in Patrick
Hughes’s freshman entry, Red Hill. Red Hil was
filmed in a rural area of Australia’s Victoria
province and tells the story of an aboriginal citizen
in jail for murder, a scary-looking guy with half of his
face scarred from a fire. This aboriginal is a native
Australian who seeks revenge not just on people who may
have harmed him when he was a kid, but from sleazy folks
rounded up by a mean sheriff who would no doubt vote Tea
Party if he were an American.
Hill is quite an effective
freshman feature! Dmitri Golovko and Charlie Parr’s
music on the soundtrack excites the emotions. Tim Hudson
has nailed a number of terrific shots, including one of
the aboriginal vengeance seeker whose scarred features
stand out under the pale moon; an extreme close-up of
a horse’s eye; a realistic capture of nature’s
mood during a pouring rain; a cow with his insides ripped
out by a feral animal; and a panther who stalks two men,
one dead, one incapacitated, deciding which fellow to
have for dinner and which to come back to for breakfast.
The story is not as effective as the
special cinematic features, borrowing as it does from
John Ford’s sketchbook, this one dealing with a
young cop, Shane Cooper (Ryan Kwanten) who is transferred
from the city to the rural wasteland because in one incident
he refuses to pull the trigger when confronted with a
gun pointed directly at him. The great irony in the tale
is that, Alice (Claire Van Der Boom), his pregnant wife
who had suffered one miscarriage, believes the small town
to be a place for peace and quiet where she can follow
her doctor’s orders to lower her blood pressure
to avoid another mishap. “How was your day?”
is her query, the one statement that should elicit a smile
or a laugh from the audience.
Bill (Steve Bisley), the head sheriff,
has little besides contempt from the city guy, even suggesting
sarcastically that the latter might be used to wine and
cheese parties, which is not de rigueur in the town of
Red Hill. Bill, who is enthusiastically applauded by the
entire town at a meeting to raise a posse, is hell-bent
on killing or recapturing Jimmy Conway (Tom E. Lewis),
who has escaped from a maximum security prison and is
just as determined to kill every man in the town who took
part in an incident he did not care for.
Steve Bisley as the sheriff and Ryan
Kwenten as the young constable hold the screen, facing
off time and again, the liberal and the conservative if
you want to make political science of the movie. The film
belongs, however, to Tom E. Lewis (The Chant of Jimmie
Blacksmith), who has a way to inflict damage on his
adversaries with arrow, boomerang, and shotgun. A pleasure
to see another revival of the Western genre: not all cowboys
come from Texas.
Rated R. 96 minutes. © 2010 by
Harvey Karten Member: NY Film Critics Online
|